MovieChat Forums > The Rum Diary (2011) Discussion > Did this movie justify the enslavement a...

Did this movie justify the enslavement and robbing of the locals?


The scene where Chenault is in the club and then the men are kicked out so the blacks can gang rape her while the black women root them on.

Was this their way of showing its ok that white people pillage and subjugate blacks and aboriginals because they are savages who would rape a white girls the first chance they get as their women clap their hands to it happening?

I think this movie was made to make it seem ok to keep the black man down.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]


OP what the heck are you talking about

It is not so much the destination as the journey!!!






reply

Aaron Eckharts character was plotting with the other conspirators to capture large swaths of land and the mining rights to the islands.

As part of a night out they decide to go to some club where Chenault does start acting slutty but before the men she came with can grab her to snap her into composing herself. (people sometime forget where they are, happens to everyone).

The other patrons who where all black push the men out, and punch aarons character. for what reason did they hit him and get so confrontational with them? because they wanted to help Chenault regain her composure. Instead the "black"men dont want that, they instead view chenault as a prey who has fallen into their trap and plan on having their way with her. Meanwhile it is evident that when this is happening the females in the club are rooting this happening, seemingly also welcoming the coming gang rape of the white girl.

This scene made aaron's character the victim, of the savage blacks who took an opportunity as a whole, meaning every single person in the club was complisate or even proactive in pushing away Chenaults male escorts so they can rape her.

As such instead of Eckharts character being viewed as a dispicable person who was out ot rape and pillage the land and people as a whole, it made him seem justified in his operations since the locals would rape a drunk girl in such a manner.

this of course is jut my opinion, but how me and the other person who saw this movie veiwed the events. As such I was wondering if the purpose of these scene both in the book and movie was to demonize the locals and make eckharts character seem justified in his plans.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

here's a thought......maybe this actually happens, in real life, and maybe it wasn't just a cinematic device, or a story-telling theme. Gasp.....maybe, since this was in the book, this ACTUALLY happened, to ACTUAL people, and NO fictionalizing of anything occurred, at all!!!!

here's another question, totally unrelated.....does the desire to further demonize all white people by any means necessary, including by arbitrarily giving them insane justifications for their evil deeds, sometimes cause complete imbeciles to post inane message board questions? Discuss....

reply


Brilliant post...thank you.

It is not so much the destination as the journey!!!






reply

The gravitas of your post is mesmerizing, please illuminate us as to your inner workings.

reply

St. Thomas is not a part of Puerto Rico and PR continues to be raped by the US govt. to this day, get an education young man!

you don't even want to know what Puerto Rican women have gone through due to our govt. testing w/ birth control was used on them leading to bad health and heart problems for many of them

among other things....



Down the rabbit-hole I GO…
what I’ll find no one knows

reply

Did I miss something? When was she gang raped?

Sanderson and Kemp certainly felt Chenault was at risk, and their attempts to 'rescue' her led to them getting thrown out of the club, but it didn't look to me like she was being forced into anything.

But yes, there are a couple of scenes in the film which show the deep hatred locals have for the "gringos" (not without reason I guess).

I used to want to change the world. Now I just want to leave the room with a little dignity.

reply

I'm with you, this scene was not in the movie.

reply

honestly, if you cant tell what was going on after the club was "closed", I am worried for you.

reply

honestly, if you cant tell what was going on after the club was "closed", I am worried for you.

You're assuming she didn't consent to whatever happened though, aren't you?

I used to want to change the world. Now I just want to leave the room with a little dignity.

reply

@yifwif

Wow. You're completely effing insane aren't you? Do you take anti-psychotics?

reply

I think it was exactly that, but my guess is it was unintentional. What I mean is, part of the tagline of the movie is "one part justice" -- the writer probably thought this was some kind of justice that people would be sympathetic towards. Neo-colonialists getting what they deserve, etc.

But much of the audience saw it for what it was, so it became as you said -- a justification for imposing modernity and order on an unruly culture.

Same thing happens in real life. Funny.

reply

You can't justify either.

I can't believe that somebody would think that the club scene justified the enslavement and robbing of the locals.

How f'n thick are you?

Sanderson is a controlling, manipulative man - he has no care in the world for her - he doesn't want his 'prize' being spoiled.

--------------------------------------
Deftones makes the world a better place

reply

The black locals didn't rape Chenault.
They just gave her a spitroast workout.
Over and over again.
She wanted a bit of action, and she got it.
Besides, it was just a movie.

reply

lol you gotta be kidding me...
anyway, take it up with Hunter S Thompson. The movie is based on the book. I bet Hunter had that agenda in mind......

reply