MovieChat Forums > The Rum Diary (2011) Discussion > Wat Happened in da Club wid Amber Heard ...

Wat Happened in da Club wid Amber Heard and all da Puerto Ricanz after..


...they kick her friendz out? did they play scrabble together? i wud like 2 think so but i believe those ppl r illitermurate...

I live, I love, I slay, and I'm content

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

i wud imagine whole club wantin 2 get 'in' da action. question is, why did they not film dis scene?

I live, I love, I slay, and I'm content

reply

I bet they turned her vagina into a Pitbull video.

reply

[deleted]

Can somebody explain exactly what happened in this scene? I had gotten up to use the bathroom at that time and when I walked back into the theater, I saw them getting kicked out of the blues bar, then Aaron Eckard asked for his car keys back...

reply

Can somebody explain exactly what happened in this scene? I had gotten up to use the bathroom at that time and when I walked back into the theater, I saw them getting kicked out of the blues bar, then Aaron Eckard asked for his car keys back...


what happened was, the band ended up bringing Paul and Sala up onstage, and the main guy told them, "no one gets out of here without singin the blues." So Paul and Sala had to make up a song about Puerto Rico, and the trials and tribulations they'd been going through, including the time they had to go pick up their friend at the bus station. Also, they had a couple of underage kids with them.

Then, Aaron Eckard had asked them to have Ugly John Pruitt tow his car to Thor's Garage to have a flat tire repaired, and since they'd done that, it was time to give him back his keys.

reply

So that's where Elisabeth Shue has been all these years!

reply

Damn bro, I ain't laughed that hard in a looong time! "DON'T *beep* WITH THE BABYSITTER!"

reply

The real Hunter Thompson came in and punched all of them in the face.

Twice.



One should always be on the lookout for fiendish thingies when enjoying winter sports.

reply

apparently no1 can answer troofully bec da admin will delete da post! total riot!

I live, I love, I slay, and I'm content

reply

With all due respect...according to the book she was raped by the locals. But also according to the book she was soo drunk that she had taken off all her clothes herself...not saying she deserved it tho. No means no regardless of anything else that happened. I don't care what a woman does, if she says no then that means no. I don't know why this scene was not shown. I think it's because rape scenes evoke a different type of feeling than any other type of scene. Violence is shown constantly and very graphically in films. People get burned to death, decapitated, limbs ripped off, necks snapped, riddled with bullets, crushed, eaten alive, etc...movies are soo gorry that it seems a lot of them are solely made to depict a gruesome death.

Rape is different because of the psychological and emotional attachments that come along with it. Movies hesitate to show rape because it makes people feel uncomfortable and uneasy. You ever notice the awkward silence that occurs after such a scene? It's because it's overwhelming. And it is insensitive and sometimes insulting to actual victims.

Now just for the record, my statements are not making jokes or poking fun at this topic. I feel that even tho this is a very sensitive subject, it is nonetheless a subject that needs to be spoken truthfully about. And I feel that this subject should be spoken about in a mature and responsible manner. So I would advise other members to exercise discretion in your reply.

reply

i clapped and cheered after dat scene. no silence here.

I live, I love, I slay, and I'm content

reply

Well then maybe you're a fan of that type of content. If so there's a whole culture of that type of thing. I don't think it's something to clap and cheer about tho...I think the only thing you'd accomplish by doing that is making yourself look ridiculous and idiotic. If you enjoy that content then it's best to show some discretion, a bit of etiquette and restraint, and keep it to yourself.

reply

daz waz wrong wid society. we become a society of 2-facez and hence inundated wid bs. why not just show every1 ur tru colorz? out of fear? condemnation? do apez have dis prob of lookin ridiculous and idiotic bec daz actually how they procreate, by forcin intercourse upon da female. of course i realize there r lawz against dis in our society. be4 u become smug about dis, just remember these same lawz allow a bank 2 be rescued by taxpayers' moula but a mum and pop store receive no such aid and like many succumbed 2 bankruptcy in dis recession

I live, I love, I slay, and I'm content

reply

Well I'm not saying to be 2 faced. I'm saying that this type of content has to be used in a discreet manner. There is an entire culture of this out there. There are comics, forums, and even groups who are fans of it in a tasteful manner. There are couples who enact scenes and even engage in wild and vivid role playing. However, they're not gonna just walk up to strangers or the public and disclose this.

I don't know if you watched this film in a theater or at home. But if it was in the privacy of your home then you are entitled to enjoy whatever content you want as long as it's not illegal or prohibited. If you were cheering and clapping in a theater full of people then that is not appropriate. Especially if there was a victim or friend/relative of a victim of assault present. Your behavior would be offensive at that point. And since you are not aware of who is present in an audience it is best to keep such emotions private like I mentioned before.

As far as apes, we are not apes because we live in a "civilized" society with established norms, rules, etiquette, and laws. Still, deep down inside we have a subconscious primitive side. I feel that this movie played upon a lot of that primitive aspect in a subliminal manner. And I will agree that the scene was arousing...and the build up to that scene throughout the movie was arousing also.

And BTW, there are many film makers who believe that society has become accepting of brutal violence, yet there is very little tolerance of sexual content. And I also believe this is the case as I mentioned in another post earlier. It's mainly because people stereotype the fans of this content...that if you are aroused by it, then you will do it or have done it. Or that you have psychological problems, or psychiatric problems, or you're a pervert, etc. Yet there are people who enjoy violence yet have never ever committed a violent act. There are people who laugh, cheer, clap, yell, and celebrate when Jason decapitates an innocent teenage girl while she is naked...but let the girl get raped and people are ashamed to even watch. You can even hear the sounds of disgust when this occurs. Again it's because getting your head chopped off is a moment of terror followed by a quick death. Assault carries trauma that endures for years. While we love to see an attractive young couple getting mutilated by Chuckie, we'd hate to see the emotions that go along with assault.

All in all society as a whole is not ready for this content in the mainstream. Maybe that's a good thing or maybe it's bad...I don't know. But the best thing is to be respectful and cautious in what you tell others about yourself. It's one thing to be true to yourself, but that doesn't mean you should tell everyone everything about yourself.

reply

there is some contradiction in ur 1st paragraph. it shudnt have 2 be dis way

exactly, we r not too different from animalz despite wat we believe

daz exactly da prob. so its ok 2 cheer 4 chuckie or jason despite da fact there may be victimz of murder in audience, but 4 rape and sexual assault, we must be quiet

hypocrisy is runnin rampant. wat does it tell u dat we must keep 2 ourselvez durin sexual scenez when da movie is showin us these scenez? how deranged is da director 4 showin us these scenez? why r they herald as grate figurez in society 4 showin us these sceenez? accordin 2 ur logic of society, these ppl dat recreated such scenez r sicker than da ppl enjoyin them but daz not da case is it?



I live, I love, I slay, and I'm content

reply

I don't know where you saw that I contradicted myself. What I'm saying is that some things are accepted by a society while other things are not...even tho they may be similarly heinous. Every society is this way. There are rules that are upheld while others are allowed to be violated. As an example, there are townships around my area where you can drive 10 mph over the speed limit while in other towns you can't drive even 1 mph over. As a society progresses it is decided or agreed upon as to what is acceptable and what is not. I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying that's the way it is.

And as a member of society your obligation is to abide or be ridiculed and/or outcast. If you were in a theater and cheered at a gruesome murder scene, it would be considered rude because you're disturbing other viewers with such an outburst. But nobody would ridicule you for enjoying the scene. Now if you cheered at a rape scene, more than likely you would be confronted and even escorted out. Not only because you interrupted other viewers, but also because your actions are deemed inappropriate according to society. You can comply or be defiant but you can't blame a person for confronting you if you chose to act in an inappropriate manner. All the philosophical jargon in the world won't lend any hand to helping you explain yourself.

As far as the film makers, they get a lot of flak about the scenes they create. Gaspar Noe' received much ridicule for the movie Irreversible. Other movies that featured assault scenes were likewise ridiculed...the film makers were accused of glorifying assault and intentionally making assault look enticing. So yes, the viewers and film makers alike are ridiculed for these scenes.

Compared to animals, we are not far from them in that we do what they do. We kill, steal, etc. Yet we do so out of a conscious decision and often times for greed. Animals do such out of instinct to survive, protect, and mate. Not to mention that humans for the most part are more capable of civility.

reply

There is absolutely nothing wrong with showing a rape scene & it's in no way disrespectful to any audience members. That's just plain ridiculous. Rape is part of life & since movies depict life it should be part of them too. Foreign movies show rape quiet often. It's precisely what's wrong with the American mindset. Certain things are OK to show (like extreme violence) yet when it has anything to do with sex it's taboo.

Lastly, if you think that as a member of society it is your duty to abide I feel sad for you. It's true that most people are sheep, but that doesn't mean you have to be one too.

reply

Calm down, I was just telling it like it is. And it is disrespectful within our culture to show extensive rape. Why do you think there are rules that filmmakers abide by? Because certain things cannot be shown in a movie unless there is some kind of recompense for the action. Which means that in a fiction film, a character who rapes another character has to have some kind of action occur to him before the end of the movie. You ever notice that? And BTW, nowhere did I say I agree with typical American mindset...or any other mindset for that matter.

And yes it is your duty to abide to established laws, rules, norms. Which is why people don't go to restaurants and eat with their fingers. Or why it's improper to belch out loud in an eatery. Or why people don't just sneeze all over the place without excusing themselves. Or why you don't pick your nose or scratch your crotch before you shake another person's hand or touch items. None of these things are illegal, but nobody does it purposely. So like I said, it's inappropriate to just walk around talking about how much you enjoy rape scenes. Not because it's illegal, but because you'll make yourself open to ridicule while looking like a social deviant. If that's your desire then more power to you...it's your prerogative man. If you feel different then you're either a criminal or a very rude individual.

reply

mic7440 - Well put! Anyone who thinks that such a horrible fate is something to clap and cheer about...well, I can't write here what I think of them. But yes, there is plenty of that garbage on the Internet and TV. In the book, it was not a scene that was written for cheering, etc., but to show the more human side of the seemingly nymphomaniac Chenault. Just because she's not the proper Miss Prude and likes to have more than one man does NOT mean she wanted to get raped! She was foolish, drunk and acting out rebellion against her stuffy, upper class background.

I think it was also Thompson's way of not letting the poor off the hook when it came to corruption, violence and the abuse of women. His book did not just trash rich people, which was very insightful.

The only thing to clap about is that Chenault ditches Sanderson and ends up with Kemp, who treats her very gently. She is clearly not the "Wild Thing" we think at first.

She deserves her revenge, and we deserve to die.

reply

I lol'd so hard @ "no silence here". ^_^}~~

With all due respect at that matter, this answer was way to funny to not laugh.

reply

So apparently personal responsibility isn't real high on your list of priorities, but simply saying "no" is... interesting.

reply

If that is what you took out of my message then any further discussion would be futile.

reply

The dumb b1tch put herself at great risk by getting SO drunk and putting herself as the centre of a attention in a club full of young, drunk, horny foreign men. She danced very provocatively, and eyeballed that black guy heaps. What the hell did she expect to happen?

And LOL @ idiots saying that "but still, he shouldn't have raped her"... she was tempting fate! What do you think would happen if a lamb was prancing around nearby a pack of hungry lions? I know that animals are different to humans in that they don't reason like we do, but my point still stands in that in the face of many drunk, horny men who have lost their inhibitions and you getting naked infront of them... these things do happen.

Basically, she was a dumb slut who wanted to be the centre of a attention and whore out her image to everyone in that club. She got what she wanted. I'm sure she enjoyed all those BBC's plowing her. LOL @ pretending to have guilt when seeing Johnny Depp later on. What a dumb wench.

If she entered that club and stayed around her friends closely and was much more CONSERVATIVE in how she presented herself and left when the other guys wanted to leave (at whatever time), I'm 100% confident that she would have been fine.

reply

Well technically, no is no. A woman can do whatever she wants and should not be forced against her will. However we all know how far that logic goes in our own country and foreign places as well. She should have been more cautious. But she enjoyed the attention as the only white woman in the club and probably in that entire area. Her husband even commented that the locals would stare at her as she lay naked on the beach. She obviously knew all this and enjoyed being attractive yet unattainable by these guys. She started a scene in the club, walked far away from the men she came with, and then proceeded to engage in a provocative tease with the largest dude in the club...while surrounded by nothing but men. Given the circumstances, she probably shouldn't have even been in that club in the first place much less making a scene and trying to stand out. But I bet she was counting on her husband's influence, wealth, power, and connections with government officials to save her. What she didn't count on is that all those things have no impact when you get deeper into slum-like areas. If she had just enjoyed herself in the company of the people she came there with then yes, she probably would have been fine. She had no business getting soo wasted that she became unaware of the danger escalating around her. I guess she finally realized it when the guy un-did her dress but it was too late by then.

But still, they should not have raped her regardless. Granted I'm sure she'll be more cautious. And I'm sure she knows she could have been killed or severely beaten on top of the rape. But no matter how you slice it, no is no. Otherwise guys would be out there raping women all the time and then saying "oh, she was dancing on me and stripping her clothes so she deserved it". Get my point? We have laws, rules, and norms in place because we need them to keep society in check.

reply

Well put! Yes Chenault was foolish and drank too much, but so did the guys. Did THEY deserve to be raped by a gang of women (or men, for that matter)? No. This idea that women must watch what they wear, how much they drink and watch where they go is sexist and antiquated. Most rapists don't NEED a woman to screw up or not "be conservative" (what's with THAT, anyway?!) to commit that particular crime, either!

HST himself wrote very angrily about rape when he was riding with Hell's Angels. He intervened in a gang bang of one of the women who rode with them(!), that somehow involved beating up a dog, and was got the crap beat out of him.

His assessment of their behavior: "Only a punk beats up a woman and a dog." So HST's opinion of Chenault's behavior would differ from those who say "she deserved it".

She deserves her revenge, and we deserve to die.

reply

I don't know why you're writing like that.
I'm sorry to say, judging from her reaction before the camera cut-away and the reaction of the men guarding the entrance, she was gang-raped by the locals.

reply

[deleted]

She got surprise butt sex.

Copy and paste this in your signature if you love Jesus Christ, or hell awaits.

reply

I'm really not sure you're one to be discussing illiteracy, you sound like an f'ing idiot.

reply