MovieChat Forums > Che: Part Two (2009) Discussion > Poetic justice: 'Che' vs 'Braveheart'

Poetic justice: 'Che' vs 'Braveheart'


Apparently this movie (well, both of them, actually) completely bombed at the box office. Outside of a few ex-hippies and leftie grad students at Berkeley, no one saw this movie. And, in the time since, it has disappeared from the public scene. The fact that this movie has only 57 comments on this site (The Phantom Menace has almost 4,000) shows what little effect it has had on the public consciousness.

In contrast, there's another movie about a GENUINE Freedom Fighter that did much better. I'm talking, of course, about "Braveheart". That movie became an international blockbuster, earned an Oscar for Best Picture, and his still beloved by millions of fans to this day. William Wallace was everything Che wasn't, a genuine patriot fighting against a foreign tyrant who oppressed and abused the people against their will. Che was a faux revolutionary who, after helping turn one country (Cuba) into a totalitarian dictatorship, then went abroad and tried to use force to impose his evil ideology on the people of other countries, who, to their credit, wanted none of it.

In sum, Wallace was the Real Deal, and is still an inspiration to true freedom lovers to this day. Che was just another Marxist turd, a megalomaniac with a Messiah complex, a guy whose image appears on the T-shirts of assorted self-proclaimed "Hipsters" and pseudo-intellectuals who think Cuba is great because they have government run health care but, rather than move there and enjoy the fruits of the great People's Workers' Paradise, sit here at home and write angry screeds about the very country (America) that, quite unlike Castro's Cuba, gives them the freedom of speech to do so.

reply

The movie greatly romanticised Che of that there is no doubt. However , as a proud Scot, I can assure you that historically this movie was infinitely more accurate than Braveheart, which would hardly be difficult. Braveheart was just a simple action movie reasonably executed for maximum excitement , which explains it's success.

Che Guavara was in reality an orthodox Leninist and I have no sympathy with that political position whatsoever .It simply treats human beings like rats in a laboratory on which to perform social experiments. Ironically, he has now been mythologised as a kind of "Robin Hood" type of figure, which I think would not please him in the slightest .

It has to be said in all fairness, that if the USA and the West in general had been more imaginative and supported social reform and progress in Latin America rather than backing military dictatorships and the oligarchs , Communism would never have made any impression in the Region.



Gordon P. Clarkson

reply