MovieChat Forums > Flesh for the Beast (2003) Discussion > FLESH FOR THE BEAST!!!NOT BAD

FLESH FOR THE BEAST!!!NOT BAD


This movie was cool wach the uncut movie lots of cheep gore hell of nudity the soundtrack rulzz the house was creepy give it a look!!

reply

I'm planning on buying it soon uncut. Ruby Larocca is hot in this movie.

reply

[deleted]

The movie wasn't bad at all, but it wasn't great either. I feel they made the best movie they could with the budget they had. It would have benefited from a few more scares and build up of tension though, but it had gallons of blood and guts to keep the gore hounds out there, like me, satisfied for 90 minutes. :)

reply

I consider "Flesh for the Beast" to be a real bang-up down'n'dirty horror splatter pic. I thought it was quite creepy, sexy and gory as hell. The actresses who played the succubi were all total hotties and the movie makes an interesting point on how evil essentially feeds itself on such fundamental human weaknesses as lust and greed.

"Warren Oates died for our sins"

reply

Yeah, I didn't think it was all that bad. Enough gore and girls to go around.

What do you think this is, a signature? It's a way of life!

reply

I deemed it watchable.

reply