1: How come the BBC haven't posted the public's reviews for episode 5 on their SoS-site yet? With the previous episodes the reviews were online by monday.
2: We didn't actually see a dead Paul in episode 5, did we? Maybe the child is his, and not Craig's. I hope so.
I dont think Craig will have to worry about the child, I mean, I dont think it matters who's it is.
and they just posted the reviews, lol, Ive been checking all week. cause Im that desperate for something sos to read.
Of course it matters! I would simply hate it if Craig had an eeeeeeeeevil baby! I really wish it were someone else's! Am I the only one who is upset about this? Come on, he is one of the leads! I really liked the idea of the characters being personnally touched by the supernatural phenomena this season (Like in episode 2), but I think Craig has/was touched a bit too personal... I hope it really will all turn out to have been a dream.
Will check out the review-section at the bbc!
yes, but I dont think it will ever be mentioned again. I dont think he'll have to play any part in it.
but your right, poor craig! I think I would have a small mental break down if I were him!
Paul is dead, because he didn't get Sarah pregnant. If Craig didn't get her pregnant, he would also be dead.
The BBC have posted the public's reviews on their site. Follow this link to view them:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/seaofsouls/episodes/episode5_yourreviews.shtml