MovieChat Forums > The Zodiac (2006) Discussion > rory culkin?

rory culkin?

posted 17 years ago by edt89
3 replies | jump to latest

when was this film actually filmed? im asking because rory culkin looks young as hell in it and he should have been like what, 15 in 2005? i dunno i just think he looks really young here, anyone else agree?

[–] shrutefan99 17 years ago

yea i looked at his page on imdb and it says he was born in 89 so in 05 he would be what...16 so even if they filmed two years before...he looks like 8 not 14... idk seems fishy...

[–] cowboy12156 17 years ago

The whole Culkin family looks alot younger than their age. I'm like that too.

[–] designerguy1979-1 17 years ago

I just saw this movie last night and the copyright at the end said 2002....dunno
BOOM BOOM KITTY *beep*