So what is it NC-17 for?


This movie looks really interesting and especially by the fact that it is directed by Gregg Araki, who directed my favorite movie White Bird In A Blizzard AND these two movies have the same music composers (not gonna lie, the score for WBIAB was amazing).
But what made this movie NC-17? I'm underage so I'm just curious. The IMDb page doesn't say anything why it's rated that.
WBIAB was rated R and definitely deserved that rating for the sex scenes, nudity, language and the thematic material. Is this any much worse?

If you do know why this one's NC-17, I wouldn't mind if you'd say it. Also maybe your opinion. And I'm not going to read the parents' guide cause spoilers :p

Thanks!

reply

Very frank depictions of child molestation, a rather disturbing scene of a confused boy (molestation victim) performing a sex act on another young boy, a rather violent male rape scene, etc. The whole film revolves around material that most people would find uncomfortable, to say the least.




Fighting the frizzies, at 11.

reply

In Australia it was rated R for:high level child sexual abuse themes, high level sexual violence and pedophile theme. Which pretty much sums it up exept for other sexual acts of a more consenting nature. However in america the NC-17 is most likely down to a prolonged sequence at the end of the film involving sexually explicit duologue. Child molestation, other sex related activitys and rape are all discussed in depth, and implied visually in a much more suttle manner, never the less it was enough to earn that rating.

reply