MovieChat Forums > Alone in the Dark (2005) Discussion > The worst part has to be...

The worst part has to be...


The shootout in the warehouse or Carnby's house. The effects are terrible and make no sense.

But the rest of the movie was still a load of s**t!

reply

I would say the worst part is putting down money on this piece of crap or maybe the fact that I won't get that 96 minutes of my life back.

The only redeeming quality is how fun it is to rip on it.

http://www.talkhoops.net/
Support the Habit

reply

the part where it was black except for when they were shooting?? yeah thats when i turned it off. never watched the rest... wish i could give it a negative score

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

You're right that I won't get it back either way. I've never thought of it that way. How about this: it doesn't feel like the 96 minutes was wasted if I had seen a good movie. And if I wasted 96 minutes think of all the time Uwe Boll wasted making this piece of crap.

http://www.talkhoops.net/
Support the Habit

reply

Completely agrre! I have seen some crap in my life but this simply takes the p£ss. Just finished watching this and I am utterly gutted. Some movies you just know are going to be bad but I can find at least a couple of redeeming things, but not this one. As a frequent visitor to this site I don't like to cause rifts but seeing what other people wrote I am glad I am not alone in saying this is one of the worst movies ever, I have seen worse but this was terrible. Sorry - felt like a rant!!!

The Dude Abides

reply

Yeah. This film was BEYOND bad. This film was----complete vomit. With Tara Reid in it, it's vomit with mold growing on it. The only thing that kept me watching this vomit was Stephen Dorff. I'm a fan of his----every since The Gate, then Blade being my second favorite. Without him in it, I wouldn't have even bothered.

reply