MovieChat Forums > Ong-Bak (2005) Discussion > OVER_RATED (DETAILS INSIDE)

OVER_RATED (DETAILS INSIDE)


First I am going to start this off by saying that I am an active competitor and 3rd degree black belt in Tae Kwon Do and have studied enough to consider myself fairly knowledgeable in the feild of Martial Arts.

This movie is for one, over-rated. Like a psoter in another thread stated, Tony Jaa has no charisma. If you see Jackie Chan or Jet Li fight, they tell a story. They have physcology (sp?) and presence, Jaa has none of that. He does his moves which are ncie indeed, but get repetitive and boring.

On the back of the DVD case this takes a cheap shot on Jackie Chan, I know it is for promototional purposes but please. Jackie Chan and Jet Li are gods of the Martial Arts movie world, and have the experience and charisma to execute well in a film like this. The chase scene was good and Jaa showed amazing agility but hell the barrel scene in SHanghia Knights leaves that in the dust, and that is saying something. Like earlier stated, Li and Chan have physcology, they can make it comedic or show fear etc.

Jaa is skilled at Muy Tae, but his ksills dont overlap into this area. His style is more for real life fighting, not demonstration and coordinated fighting. Three reasons why the fight scenes weren't good...

1)Crappy Partners.
All of the people Jaa fought were bad. Each guy in the bar was horrifically slow and showed no skill, the main henchmen was good but not something better than on a weekly Texas Walker show.

2) Repetition.
Ok we know Jaa can jump and knee someone in the face, or elbow them in head. Ok it is good the first time, but c'mon. He does the same moves over and over and over, showing no diversity in his style. You never see him adapt to knew opponents, he jsut sticks to his basic moves and does them.

3) No storytelling.
They were just fights... that is it.

I will go to admit Jaa has some skill. He can do flips and spin kicks like nothing but he needs to do that rather than his repitive moves. Li and Chan are so great because of there fast hand to hand combat. Do we see any of that? NO.
-

Overall not a bad movie, but shouldn't be regarded as something special.

reply

I agree it got repetitious. It was still a cool movie and all, but it is definately not the second coming everyone made it out to be.

However, you are talking about gods of martial arts films and don't mention Bruce Lee?? Whaaa??

And Jet Li is a pretty craptastic actor. His skills are great but my god that guy is way worse than Tony. And Tony barely talks in this...

reply

[...]Muy Tae[...]

I stopped reading here.

reply

I stopped reading it when he said he was a in Tae Kwon Doe, *beep* form of martial arts ever! Everyone has a black belt in Tae Kwon Doe, you see 3 year olds in walmart with black belts. Honestly a black belt means nothing anymore, other than you pay 90 bucks a month for a glorified dance class. I have a black belt in Kung fu, Tae Kwon Doe, and Ninjistu I also have 6 years of boxing under my belt. I don't gloat about being the all knowing god of martial arts. Anyways I just saw this film for the first time today and I almost *beep* myself, Tony Jaa is a very skillful and is very respectable in his art. Repeative it got toward the end but the movie is called "the thai warrior" so if he can jump up in the air slam his knee/elbow into someone's face then do it, if it works again he do it again. This film had some one the best fight scenes I've seen in a movie in a while. 9/10 for me

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

well said,i agree, i personally found it enjoyable the film not being tied down with too much story and a more brawl style fight, often so many martial arts films are slowed down needlessly by pointless side stories and love interests, it was nice to see a real fight film that didnt feel over choreographed

reply

I agree with you, for this movie. It was refreshing to see someone who is a truly skilled fighter. I don't need to see new moves every fight, that would be unrealistic. If it works, it works. Do champion boxers change their moves for every opponent? Of course not. They just hit the other guy until he falls down.

And I have seen "black belts" who can't even kick a stationary target reliably. :P

reply

<<<user name t-owens81>>>

stopped reading there

reply

Hahaha, this gets me.

reply

Your third degree lets you down, Tae kwan doe sucks and Jet li's moves are only for show.

reply

Please, this guy probably takes SPORT Tae Kwon Do. I take traditional, and no I don't have a black belt. None of the little kids have black belts either. Please don't judge Tae Kwon Do because of guys like this. Okay, first, if you start trying to hit someone with a flip, you will get your ass kicked. The beauty of Mauy Boran, which is what he uses,(not Mauy Thai, which is a similar style that directly comes from Mauy Boran) is that it is such a brutal style. As well, you don't adapt your style to other people, it's not like a video game. If you are into the high flying flipping stuff then a movie that doesnt have any CG, strings or stunt doubles is not for you.

reply

I guess a real marital artist might have some issues with the film, but I thought it was good, better than any Jackie Chan movie. I mean, Jackie tries to hard to be funny, and it just comes out stupid. This guy Jaa was more realistic.

reply

tony better than jacki that's one of the foolish and silly comment i heard in my life...jackie, bruce lee and jet li they are legends...how can u compare with this new guy..thats awful..please try to see what jackie did in his earlier movies and then comment...

reply

Jackie WAS a Legend. Until he ruined his name with stupid ass movies like around thw world in 80 days and the tuxedo. Old Jackie is a legend, new Jackie, sucks.

Either way, Sonny Chiba hasn't even been mentioned yet...

reply




Dude, make sure your spellings are correct before making your point. And for the record;it's muay thai not muy tae. I had to bite my lips and keep reading when I got to that point.

reply

Dude, make sure your spellings are correct before making your point. And for the record;it's muay thai not muy tae. I had to bite my lips and keep reading when I got to that point.


Please. This is a movie message board, not a Rhodes Scholar's convention. We all knew what he meant. This is just your way of showing everyone how "reverent" and cosmopolitan you are. So you know how to spell a foreign word - big whoop. Get over yourself. Same goes for nc-biehlhe3.

reply

As Thai uses a non-roman alphabet no romanised spelling really produces an accurate English pronunciation. So any way you spell it is not totally right... good work depastino... let's get back to talking about movies...

reply

I loved the movie, and I love spelling and grammar too. If you want to go out on the street without your pants, fun for you. If you want to post on a public board and not care about your language, prepare to be judged for it.
:)

reply

> If you want to go out on the street without your pants, fun for you. If you want to post on a public board and not care about your language, prepare to be judged for it.

That is, by far, the dumbest analogy I have ever seen.

reply

I think it's fitting.

reply

One of the funniest things on these message boards are those who act as grammar critics, but fail to show they can exercise it themselves.

Nice work quant.

reply

Not being overly critical, as I actually agree with you to a point, BUT, unlike Chinese, Japanese, even Vietnamese and Indonesian, there is NO standardized spelling/transliteration of the Thai language into other foreign tongues.. Depending on the language pronouncing the word มวย, has been spelled Mwy. Muai. Muay, Mhuai, ...also FWIW, the dialects of Lao, Issan, Korat, Lanna (Chiang Ma). and standard mid plains (Bangkok) dialect all sound slightly different, ...Thai is the generally accepted spelling if it's referring to Muai Thai 'Standard'...as in the country of the national boxing sport...but if referring to the ethnicity it's usually transliterated as T'ai...

reply

The movie is exactly what I heard it was: no story, but some VERY cool moves (jumping through barbed wire, anyone?), and some ACTUAL fights, not just this Jackie Chan family-friendly stuff, which is fine, but outside the tradition of real martial arts films.

reply

I also found many of the moves repetitive and its only the first movie I've seen him in. I also dont like how every move was so spaced apart, he would do one cool move - break - other cool move - break. I just didnt think the action flowed smoothly.

My favourite scene was also when Jaa was running away from that gang of people but even that got repetitve, ok he jumped legs up over bubbles, ok now over tables, over a bike, over rakes, over cars.. ok i get it, he can jump high, thats awesome but common. I also enjoyed the runaway scene from Shanghai Knights better.

Jaa definately has potential, I think if he creates a better personality and has someone help with action choreography he will go on to make amazing movies in the near future. As an introduction to Tony Jaa this movie works, but its definately not the best Martial Arts movie like Ive heard some people say.

reply

I also found many of the moves repetitive and its only the first movie I've seen him in. I also dont like how every move was so spaced apart, he would do one cool move - break - other cool move - break. I just didnt think the action flowed smoothly.

My favourite scene was also when Jaa was running away from that gang of people but even that got repetitve, ok he jumped legs up over bubbles, ok now over tables, over a bike, over rakes, over cars.. ok i get it, he can jump high, thats awesome but common. I also enjoyed the runaway scene from Shanghai Knights better.

Jaa definately has potential, I think if he creates a better personality and has someone help with action choreography he will go on to make amazing movies in the near future. As an introduction to Tony Jaa this movie works, but its definately not the best Martial Arts movie like Ive heard some people say.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Jet Li had a grand total of one facial expression in Hero. I haven't seen those other movies, but if (as you claim) Hero is any indication, he is on par with Keanu Reeves for total acting skill. The difference is, I could kick Keanu Reeves' ass. Why watch a movie like this for acting? Watch it for the sheer hellish joy of seeing Tony Jaa kick someone in the head with his legs on fire. Drooool. I love Ong-Bak.

reply

That's not fair at all. You can tell Jet Li at least can play polarized roles if nothing else, and I think for a martial artist he is far more skilled at conveying his emotion when fighting than when acting (which a martial artist should be able to do).

Just watch The One with Jet Li- he plays a good guy, and a bad guy, and a few guys in between. He's very charismatic, can come off as sweet and at times can be really freaking scary.

Those little asian dudes man...I wouldn't want to be kicked by Jet Li.

And whoever the heck on this board said that all of Jet Li's moves are for show: You are DEAD WRONG- he's a procient Wushu and Shaolin martial artist- knowing Bagua is NOT for show- that is a real, and highly efficient martial art. What Keanu Rheeves learned for "The Matrix" was for show. Jet Li is one of the only true martial artists in mainstream cinema today (and other than Jackie Chan the most famous). Let me be fecicious and say it's because my certified Shaolin Teacher says so.

<i>My mistake...four coffins.</i>

reply

Unleashed?? Are you kidding me? the guy didn't say a word in the entire movie. Unleashed was a good movie, and its only right that someone who can't act should only be in the movie for his true skills...martial arts.

reply

"he would do one cool move - break - other cool move - break."

I've seen muay thai in real action, and due to the extreme power of the blows, that gives the fighter time to take a break. Notice how the fighters on the receiving end were knocked back several feet? **Note** I proclaim myself the farthest thing from an expert, just an avid spectator, and having been on the receiving end once or twice.

"I also enjoyed the runaway scene from Shanghai Knights better."

This I agree with whole heartedly. But keep in mind the budget of these films and what style in which they were made (Thailand to Hollywood).

"As an introduction to Tony Jaa this movie works, but its definately not the best Martial Arts movie like Ive heard some people say."

This was in no way the best I've seen, but the adaptation of Muay Thai (also Muay Boran in another respect) was sensational. I mentioned before, I have personal experiance with this style of fighting (older brother has kicked my a**), and to see it glorified on film was *beep* AWESOME

reply

HAHAHAHAHA!
Did you say: "I am an active competitor and 3rd degree black belt in Tae Kwon Do"?! Everyone who actually trains REAL martial arts know that Tae Kwon Do is just the lamest fighting system I the world. You can't even spell Muay Thai, Jesus Christ you are so lame!

Second of all, Ong Bak is one of those few fighting movies out there where the fighting is somewhat realistic. Yeah, it actually hurts to be elbowed in the face. That's why he does it all the time in the movie, instead of those ridicules *beep* moves that Jackie Chan and Jet Lee use.

Btw. I know something about marital arts. I’ve been traning MMA for some years now and I know what hurts. Tae Kwon Do doesn’t.

reply

Cheers to you man. Though I've never had training, I've been watching my older brother kickbox for years now. He claims that he uses a mix of judo and a watered down muay thai technique (alot of the bone-crushing moves arent allowed... go figure).

Thats why I loved this movie! Sure, the story sucked, and Ting wasn't the greatest actor, but this movie was about respecting an ancient style of fighting designed to get the job done in seconds. Not as ridiculous as Jackie's attempt at comedy.

BTW, my younger brother who is a second degree black belt in Tae Kwon Do, where people level up with no real testing (they really use anywhere from yellow to red belts as judges), and the instructors "instruct" the judges to just go ahead and pass these people anyways. Don't want to hurt feelings. HA!

reply

I do Muay Thai and I can tell you it's not some flowy kung fun style, it's very much 'how can i put as much power behind that fist/kick/elbow/knee so that my opponent drops to the mat unconscious'

*Song Byung Gu, the little Stork that could, bring home a gold for all us Protoss fans*

reply

Some very interesting opinions indeed! I for one, cannot understand how anyone could not love this movie. Funnily enouh I first caught it in Thailand about this time last year when I was there training and I found myself having to pick my mouth up off the floor every few minutes.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion of course. I just can't understand how you could not think Ong Bak is the best thing since sliced bread. Someone mentioned Bruce, as of course is almost obligatory when discussing a new martial arts movie and we all know how skilled Bruce was but a good actor? I don't think I've ever seen a good Martial Arts actor with the possible exception of Brandon Lee in The Crow. Of course the big difference here is that Brandon was an actor who just so happens to be able to do Martial Arts.

Just for the record, as Thai uses a completely different alphabet to us any words are going to be spelt phonetically. So, although Muay Thai is the accepted spelling there is nothing wrong with spelling it slightly differently. For example a lot of Wing Chun schools spell it Ving Tsun.

All those who didn't think Tony Jaa's repertoire of moves was that impressive please bear in mind that the guy only studied Muay Boran for a couple of years for this film. He was mainly a stuntman and I for one think his performance has completely blown anything made recently out of the water :)

reply

I just wanna add, stratham in the first transporter. him and the french cop were the only half decent actors in the whole movie.

reply

[deleted]

tae kwon do is an olymic sport, it IS important. Jesus *beep* you have no idea what tae kwon do is. It's a very simple striking art, and some of the BEST fighters use tae kwon do. It's speed and accuracy, and *beep* Muay thai men would have a very, VERY hard time hitting them.

reply

ha! key word being "simple"


"Be ashamed to die until you have achieved some victory for humanity" -Without A Trace

reply

just want to say something about the whole tae kwon doe issue...

First of all anyone who knows Muay Thai can kick a black belts ass, BUT for Tony Jaa's new movie sword he is studying tae kwon doe so he can have a mixed martial arts style (In Tom Yum Goong Jaa uses a more of Elephant boxing techniques then Muay Thai)..so Im on both sides of the fence but I think u knock TKD a little too much

reply

[deleted]

HAHA! okay, go fight a thai fighter, record it, post the video somewhere online. then come give us a link. I would very much like to see a skilled tae kwon do fighter beat a skilled muay thai fighter.

reply

HA, I study JuJitsu and let me tell you something, Tae Kwon Do 3rd degree black belt vs a (me then) yellow belt in JuJitsu (only 2 ranks up) managed to prove that sport martial arts are not effective in an environtment that doesn't rely on point scoring and kicking as high as you can....In short, the art of TKD looks good but only in competition, against a system that is purely reliant on defence like MMA and JuJitsu.....No chance, poor guy left the dojo after realising a few kicks won't stop somebody who can be a few feet away or even a few inches away, especially as he didn't enjoy being uupstaged by a lower rank in another system and his many kicks missed and paled in comparison to 2 simple moves used in JuJitsu :-)

TKD looks good but a MMA system like JuJitsu is much more effective, TKD limits you to kicking and looking flashy, JuJitsu implements JUDO, KUNG FU, KARATE, AIKIDO, KEMPO and NINJITSU, thats 6 styles vs 1 in this instance and anybody who trains in MMA or JuJitsu will know that we don't do it for show, even in training its ful contact and is about the quickest way of dealing with an opponent utilising maximum damage with minimum effort.

TKD would probably attempt to use a quick kick to the head and a flurry of kicks, JuJitsu would break the leg and then use elbows, knees, fists and if insulted enough, the student would even use kicks with 10x more effect. Blackbelts in JuJitsu are rare and few as its a demanding and punishing art, a 3rd degree blackbelt in TKD just looks good, and if the blackbelt is a kid.....well....it must be easy if not childs play.

Oh and as for the TKD giving the Muay Thai fighters a hard time...my money is on Muay Thai, an elbow and knee are much more effective and quicker than you think....

Tony Jaa has done well, hes dedicated to what he is doing and every move counts, it looks good and so what if the script and acting sucked, the moves are used not because they look good but because they are simple and work, trust me, elbows and knees are very useful.

reply

In relation to the point about acting in Martial Arts films, Bruce Lee in particular, you have to remember he was the first Asian to make it in American cinema. He intended to put the combat and style first not strictly the acting, its a martial arts movie afterall. I don't think anyone seriously goes to watch a martial arts movie for the acting now do they? Also he used to be in west end type shows, which is very different to conventional onscreen acting.
Regardless, i think it's quite charming in a way. And there are execptions. Sammo Hungs quite a witty talented actor and great fighter too. It's also good to see martial arts of all styles being shown worldwide and appreciated for what they are.

As for the film, yeah, the storylines fairly typical but thats to be expected of most martial arts films. but the Muay Thai in it is beautifully an accuratly displayed. i've been practising and competing internationally in Kung Fu and Kick boxing for years, but fight a muay thai boxer? hell no! That is a style for the truely hard bastards and takes years of dedication and ritual, which tony has clearly put in.

Just ask your self this..
would you rather a highly skilled fighter with average acting star in a martial arts film,
or
a hollywood hunk/babe with superb acting try and pull off immensly skilled combat in a few months?

I know which one I'd rather.

reply

Sure the moves are repetitive, but that is the nature of the Muay Thai fighting style. I commend the directors/writers for using muay thai because it is not as flashy as the personalized styles of Jackie Chan and Bruce Lee. Sure Tony Jaa did not have much training prior to filming, but remember that Bruce Lee also had very little formal training in martial arts. There was probably about ten minutes devoted to actual plot developement which I let go because I was not expecting much. I did think, however, that the fight scenes were great. Instead of having to fend off twenty people at a time like many "martial arts" movies, we saw some very intimate fights. Overall I'd give the movie an A- because I did think it was pretty entertaining once I stopped caring about the plot.

reply

Okay first of all.. when you speak of traditional martial arts versus flexible/modern fighting systems like the combination of muay thai and jiujitsu (which most people nowadays use) you have to understand that if you only use the traditional moves you are taught or only fight the way you would fight when you are going for points.. obviously the MMA fighter will win.. but what makes you think that someone who studies taekwondo hasnt learned the instinct and ability to knee you in the head if you get too close or break your knee with those so called flashy high kicks only used lower? It's one thing to say you like one martial art over another but its quite another to make fun of an art simply because you think you are too good for it or something. The flashy high kicks you see in taekwondo are for competition. Its for show yes.. its an olympic sport for god's sake. Same goes for Judo.. you won't use pure Judo in a real fight but you will adapt it for the situation.. It all depends on what kind of training you get and how you use it in a fight. Just because someone studies Muay Thai or JiuJitsu doesn't make them a better fighter because of it. I personally have trained in Taekwondo, Muay Thai and JiuJitsu and I respect them all. Its ignorant of people to go around saying stuff about Taekwondo when you dont know anything about it. It is one of the oldest arts around and depending on the teacher it is a very good martial art to start your MMA training with.

reply

Belts mean nothing. They're just a part of the older systems. Mostly just for people who want to boast and instigate conflicts. Muay Thai, Jeet Kune Do and Krav Maga (not entirely certain about KM) don't have belts, and those systems are far more effective than the older belt w/katas styles in my opinion. All belts mean is that you've replicated all the old techniques that have been static in their systems for decades, even centuries. I'd bet on someone with 5-10 years Muay Yhai/JKD/Krav Maga vs. someone with 5-10 years Taekwondo/Karate every time. And no matter what belt someone may be, they will be annihilated without knowledge of grappling/submissions. Furthermore, Filipino Escrima/Kali makes the Taekwondo/Karate weapons katas look like gay Asian dancing w/weapons.

reply

I agree with you on some of your points but not all. To say that belts mean nothing is a little naive to be honest. I can't speak for belts in every style of fighting because I simply don't know but the styles that I know personally, the training and the testing to get higher ranking was extremely difficult. Now someone mentioned that in tae kwon do the testing was done by red belts and yelloow belts, that seems flimsy to me and if thats true then thats pretty gay, but not all testing is that easy. Getting ranking in Aikido training is CRAZY! each level you move up they throw in an extra attacker and 5-7 extra moves (to get a 4th dan in Aikido you have to be able to handle 7 other black belts Aikido and know every single move, the sensei calls out a move from the side, and you have to use whatever move he/she tells you to use and you have to be able to execute it within 5 seconds). I hope you realize thats a little bit harder than breaking a single piece of wood with a spin kick. I do totally agree with you though when you say you'd take a Muay Thai master over a karate master of course! Karate and Tae Kwon Do are very bad in terms of self defense. even a black belt in karate will tell you that if they got into a real bar fight, everything they learned gets thrown out the window! now thats saying alot! Grappling and submission training is definitely important, but to say someone who is a master at stand up will lose to someone who can grapple?? sorry but that doesn't make sense. I'd like to see someone who is an expert grappler try andm ake Steven Seagal submit. they wouldnt be able to get him down let alone make him submit. though keep in mind im NOT saying grappling/submission training is not important, im just saying it ISNT THE MOST important. Kali definitely kicks ass!!! I love doing that its crazy on so many levels!! And those Escrima sticks could kill somebody if used properly.

Just to finish off, you can't say that belts are not awarded to Muay Thai trainees. Belts may not be traditionally awarded, but you progress in the eyes of your sensei. Saying that, it is up to the Sensei to decide whether or not award you with rankings or not. If the sensei decides, "this person is good he can move up," he is going to advance your ranking, whether it be through a belt, a sash, or some sort of plaque. When I did Muay Thai, my Sensei used a level system, and each level had its own test obviously. Once I reached level 8, i was considered a black belt in Muay Thai, whether or not i received an actual black belt.

An Attacker With a Weapon, is an Attacker Without Hope.

reply

I just want to comment on the grappling part of your post.

Early MMA events (like UFC) have proven that a grappler will win 95% of the time against someone with NO grappling training. And that they WILL get someone to the ground that doesn't know how to defend against takedowns. That is why the Gracie family dominated in the early years and only had to begin working on their striking skills after everyone else started learning to counter their grappling.

"Be ashamed to die until you have achieved some victory for humanity" -Without A Trace

reply

[deleted]

Well, I've heard that said by a number of current MMA fighters as well. Unless you have a REALLY good sprawl you WILL get taken down by a grappler, and if you have NO ground game, unless you're strong enough to power out of everything, you will get your @$$ handed to you. Sure you always have a "striker's chance" (the chance of catching the guy with a knockout shot before he ever takes you down) but usually unless you have a realy good takedown defense your probably only gonna get one or two chances for the KO.

How exactly did the Gracies design the rules in their favor? And the Gracies didn't create Pride, but they did quite well in that too, so the 'hand-picking' thing is BS.

"Be ashamed to die until you have achieved some victory for humanity" -Without A Trace

reply

chuck lydell admits his ground game sucks, but he still manages to win against wrestlers. all a striker needs to know is how to get away and if you cant get away, how to get to your feet.

reply

Well his offensive ground game DOES suck, but I think it's fair to say he has a VERY good defensive ground game, which is what allows him to stay on his feet. But someone who doesn't know how to sprawl against takedowns or sweep opponents who have them mounted and so forth will be at a SEVERE disadvantage.

"Be ashamed to die until you have achieved some victory for humanity" -Without A Trace

reply

the only disadvantage is underestemating your opponent.

reply

I'm not saying you can blow off someone who doesn't grapple, I'm just saying that the lack of a ground game can be a very big *beep* in someone's armor.

"Be ashamed to die until you have achieved some victory for humanity" -Without A Trace

reply

Bragging about yr martial arts prowess isn't making you an authority on the subject when you give petty examples to why you hate this movie.


1) this is a movie get over it! It may be derivative but how many of these martial arts movies really have great stories anyway. You know why yr watching it and its not for the story (which is basically a variation of a few Bruce Lee plots). The action here more than makes up for the lack of story. Seems like yr just hating on the hype this movie is getting.

2) this is his first movie and the Thai movie industry, compared to other asian countries, is still relatively low budget and novice. With the success of this movie he's got plenty of time to improve as an actor. He's young. Chan and Li have the benefit of Hollywood now and China has been a powerhouse in asian movies for decades. There are a lot worse movies than this by far and Chan and Li have put out a few turkey's too. They are the best in movies for the moment but people wnt to see more than wirework. Li needs to do more flicks like Fist of Legend for every piece of garbage like Crade 2 the Grave and Romeo Must Die.

3) Hand combat is not the only way to fight. Tony uses knees, elbows, feet as well as hands because that's the Mauy Thai style. Segal in his prime didn't just use hand combat cuz Aikido is different from all of these styles but no less effective and actually more practical in self-defense. Do you think Bruce Lee only believed in one way of fighting? How do you think he developed Jeet Kun Do? He learned to respect aspects of every fighting stlye including boxing and wrestling and borrowed what he deemed useful. If you just want to see the same kinds of moves then you can stick with Li and Chan. I love both of their styles but im not willing to limit my enjoyment to just one style because everybody else thinks its the best. Be an individual, man. Not a follower. Learn to appreciate new styles. Even if yr not a fan of that style. And what's wrong with watching real fighting anyway? I guess in a streetfight, you'd go out and fight with a bunch of fancy acrobatic moves and Korean style high kicks like you'd see in Jackie Chan movies, huh? And you complain about crappy partners in the bar. If that was a real fight, I doubt if every person in the bar would have a fraction of the fighting skills as anyone in that bar in the movie. And that's the point. They're not all supposed to be top fighters or else they'd be in the ring fighting too.

reply

This film is one of the best martial arts/action film. The moves are realistic unlike those fly by wire chinese martial arts film.

reply

This film is one of the best martial arts/action film. The moves are realistic unlike those fly by wire chinese martial arts film.


Wire-work is used in modern Chinese martial arts movies, but there are hundreds of movies made in between the 70's to late 90's that use no wire-work which sell themselves on the physical skills of the actors, although the fighting is purely for entertainment purposes, you can't deny that there is skill there. See: Shaw Bro's

reply

Yes, I agree with you one hundred per cent!

reply