and knew you could get away with it, would you kill Sarah?
I would, and then I'd make sure that Jeremiah got back to the foster family from the beginning of the film.
--------
Where we're going, you don't need eyes to see
No, though I can begin to understand the temptation. I'd probably kidnap him then indoctrinate him with curiosity, compassion and patience.
shareYes, that is slightly more reasonable. I was in a REALLY bad mood when I made that post. She should just be turned over to child services.
--------
Where we're going, you don't need eyes to see
No. I agree with your first comment. The unforgiveable abuse that angelic little boy had to endure for or because of her really pushes her out of the whole 'oh, shes just a troubled unluckly young lady' band-wagon. She deserves everything she gets. A heartbreaking scene for me is at the police sation when he cop tickles Jerimiah and he laughs, i think its the only time hes happy and feels safe in the whole film or 4 years the flm covered.
Jimmy Bennett, Bobby Coleman and Jackson Bond. All AWESOME actors
Yes.
--------------
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for enough good men to do nothing.
Absolutely, even if I couldn't get away with it, she was a monster, and she ruined that sweet little boy.
shareNo. Wrath is no better than greed or lust ultimately. Chances are a kid that suffered this abuse would turn around a become an offender himself someday, so you'd have to kill him too. It's a dangerous fantasy that you can just cut the evil out of the world by killing people.
Somebody once tried to kill director Roman Polanski, which would have stopped him from sodomizing that poor 13-year-old girl. Somebody else made sure he wouldn't have a kid of his own to molest someday. The latter was Charles Manson (who slaughtered his pregnant wife)and the former was Adolph Hitler (who killed his mother and millions of other people). See where wrath gets you?
"Let be be finale of seem/ The only emperor is the Emperor of Ice Cream"