Can you imagine how backward it would be to make this movie about the Moto GP sport and have it be a Biaggi parade when Rossi is the one winning the races? Or what if they just left out the "small details," like who is best at the sport and who is competing with the best (i.e. Biaggi, Hopkins, McCoy, etc.). My opinion is that they did an amazing job of giving you a taste for the sport and who is involved in it. I really enjoyed hearing about the rivalry/ies (lol) and the study the doctor (not Rossi, the real MD doctor) did on Rossi and Biaggi. I thought the same thing as flyboard when he/she said: "That whole heart rate thing was extically as I thought it was going to be." It's also cool how Schwantz was Rossi's idol and Rainey was Biaggi's idol. Rossi respected the guy that simply enjoyed the sport the most (at least that's what came across), and Biaggi respected the guy who loved the sport but maybe wasn't as much of a natural at it and simply (with sheer persistence and willpower) drove himself to near perfection. There's something to be said for both approaches to anything in life. When it comes to your occupation though, I strongly believe you should do what you enjoy the most (that is what you will do the best at). I have a fascination with people who do things for the sheer joy they get out of it, and I believe that someone like Schwantz or Rossi who races in order to enjoy himself will have the slower heartbeat. It's just one of thost things. Don't get me wrong though, many people are enthralled with those who have demonstrated extreeme talent through sheer willpower. I believe life is less stressful when one aims to do the things that bring one the most joy, rather than trying to prove something to oneself or to the rest of the world. The conclusions I'm drawing here in reference to any of the racers may or may not be true (and are certainly not final). They are only preliminary observations.
reply
share