1.) I thought it was pretty obvious that Ned, as a person, not a "Neo-Nazi," was using his half-baked beliefs as a pose and defense mechanism, a method second to his "mental illness" that played a part in him trying to project the image everyone around him expected of him to regardless of what it was. The theme was dropped over and over again that he was purposely trying to convince people he was "just as terrible as everyone thinks I am." Even the title "Neo-NED" gave me that vibe [which actually means New Ned]. This is why I felt the love interest equation worked so well; she saw through his false pretenses and allowed him to be himself, even being mentally strong enough to understand that his "racist slurs" were more like a cheap fabric he was wearing, thus taking no damage.
In the clip shown of him being forced to kick a dead African-American, he not only refuses to do so, but was apprehensive before he knew what was happening; he didn't have any genuine hatred in the Nazi practices. It seemed clear to me that his character was more or less "along for the ride" when it came to being a part of the Neo-Nazi family, [as well as everything else in this movie] and was looking for just that: a family. "Supporting the causes" doesn't make you a racist if in the end all you prove to be is a faker, a poser, and a *beep* underneath. We have many posers "who will do it all to be accepted" in all kinds of social groups. It's called high school. Heck, it's called social climbers. People lie to themselves and other people all the time just to get validation. Looking convincing doesn't make it truth.
Ned was both a poser and a troll at the same exact time.
That's why the pairing didn't come off as badly as I felt it was before I understood his character. He was not something like American History X at all. Which would've been unrealistic in my opinion, unless they went through some bigger development.
reply
share