I just viewed this flick, only an odd chance, it was shown on Starz tonite and I happened to audit it while recording (for timeshift).
Another odd thing- I'm a grown man and my dad died a month ago.
Also - my job has had me meeting about 15 new people a week for these past 25 years. I get to know some of their inner most and unguarded selves. They are all kinds of folks- the American public with no filters or demographic biases.
I've learned a *lot* about human nature, and I learn more each day. One of the things that keeps shocking me, again and again, is how thoroughly different we are
in our tastes. The brightest, most educated, most sincerely candid people can both
be equally well-versed on a topic, or equally knowledgeable about a creative work --a painting or a poem, ....a film --- and have entirely different views of the essence or quality of the same item. That "there is no disputing of taste" is a well-known and ancient truth. Yet one sees posts like these preceeding mine which declare categorically that this film sucks and that those who disagree must be liars, morons, elitests, etc. The intolerance is just astounding, but this is just as human as the diversity it refuses to accept.
I found this to be a wonderful film, a very fine entertainment which doesn't insult
the viewer, but embraces him and admits strangers to a remarkable confidence.
Thank you, Mr Reichert. I think you've finally succeded in separating your face (in my mind, that is) from Animal House.
reply
share