are we talking about kurosawa: the godfather of the action sequence? the man who single-handedly revolutionized battle/fight scenes, the man to which all action filmmakers pay homage? or were we talking about the other kurosawa? just playing with you, man.
here is my take on the subject. i am very familiar with both movies. i study japanese film and have met many japanese filmmakers, some who were close friends with kurosawa. this is not meant to impress you, but to assure you that this is not unfamiliar ground for me. i wrote a 12 and a half page paper last year exploring only one single shot out of kurosawa's "rashomon," and the historical,cultural, literary and filmical significance of it. kurosawa's work lends itself to VERY deep analysis, while takeshi's work folds under any sort of exploration.
i understand that it is completely a matter of taste to which movie you enjoy more, but to the question of which is actually a better film, i don't think that it is a matter of personal preference, yojimbo is a better film than takeshi's zatoichi - there is just no way to argue that. you could very easily say that you LIKE zatoichi better than yojimbo, just as you could say that you LIKE spice world better than citizen kane, but you would be hard up to defend the statement that it is a better film. kurosawa just had a profound understanding of the workings of film that takeshi kitano will never have.
i won't go into my feelings about takeshi's addition to the great zatoichi series, because that WOULD be a matter of personal opinion.
reply
share