circumcision?
its unclear that this topic wasnt even disgust in this movie, does a man feel more pleasure having sex uncut or the other way around? show proof...
share[deleted]
MovieChat Forums > Kinsey (2005) Discussion > circumcision?
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
hi, there again jordy, youre probably right and your explanations seem logical that uncircumcise ones are much more sensitive, im cut when i was a baby so there's no way of finding out if youre statements are true or not, but hey i masturbate almost everyday and sometimes twice, so are you saying if im uncut i could do like 3-4 times?
my father was uncut until he reached puberty, he told me being uncut is filthy you have to washed it everyday or certain deposits grows under it, dont know if it is bacteria or what, and i dont intend to find out.
and one more thing, are you saying that a man who has not been cut can masturbate without lube? thats gross.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
I'm sooo happy to be uncut..
my parents from Mexico specified that I NOT BE cut.. they feel it's unnatural and unnecessary..
If you're too lazy to wash it in the shower than.. you've got bigger problems!
I'll definitely make sure my future son(s) aren't cut either!
If anything thinks it's wrong than i recommend them to do research and basically see that it's the natural way, We're born with it for a reason, I believe!
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Last I checked the rates were dropping in US for circumcision.
I think it's two fold:
1) As people learn what it REALLY is, Genital Mutilation, they shy more away from it. I mean we hear "female genital mutilation" or "clitordectomy" and most people shudder. More and more people are starting to shudder at routine infant circumcision.
2) Medicaid in quite a few states will no longer pay for circumcision. They perfer you pay for cosmetic mutilation with your own dollar. Not to mention some hospitals aren't even doing it. Our hospital won't circumcise at all, for any reason except medical neccesity. They could care less about your religion, your misconceptions, wanting your son to look like his father, wanting him to look the same, wanting to make it easier for him not to wash for weeks on end, etc.
Steph
Here in Portugal i never heard of anyone who isn't uncut. Most people find circumcision a barbaric procedure. It actually disgusts me how can someone can do that to your own baby. It's mutilation.
sharespeaking as an uncircumcised guy....foreskin ftw. The extra flap of skin works very well for providing extra friction. I don't see how anyone can stand doing it without it there
shareIn France, where I was born, circumcision is practically unknown except for religious reasons or for the phimotic. (Phimosis is a congenital condition where the foreskin is too narrow and cannot be fully retracted from the head of the penis, which makes it painful to have sex.)
My father taught me when I was a toddler how and why I had to draw the foreskin back and wash the glans and keep it clean. It's just part of being a guy.
It might amuse some of you to know that one happens to have a notoriously long prepuce. It is thus possible to ejaculate into it while closing it at the end between two fingers. One can then liberate the retained gob in any a convenient place.
This was enormously useful at school and an unbeatable ice-breaker, to boot.
If we are to be brothers, let us be brothers for life, die together.
Amuse? No. Disgust. Yes.
Redheads not warheads
YOU 've obviously never had sex in Church.
If we are to be brothers, let us be brothers for life, die together.
[deleted]
This is fascinating stuff eh sweet?
Redheads not warheads
[deleted]
Not that anyone cares but IMHO the uncut penis looks like a scary reptile that I don't want around me even if the guy it's attached to is kinda cute. Ok I'm kidding, but only slightly. However I'm all for foreskin rights. I think cutting it off all willy nilly and for no reason is stupid, not to mention barbaric.
Now where's this survey?
Redheads not warheads
[deleted]
"the uncut penis looks like a scary reptile that I don't want around me even if the guy it's attached to is kinda cute."
Imagine what you might say to a man who expressed the same opinion of the uncut female genitalia. Consider that my response to you.
Okay, I know you were mostly kidding, and not defending cutting, but the fact is, you've grown up accustomed to seeing the mutilated penis. Men in areas of the world where female genital mutilation is practiced just need to get over their preference, and so do women in this part of the world.
The dead do not recognize context.
Well said Bb!!
Granting that male circumcision may not be nearly so painful, humiliating, life-threatening and barbarous a practise as female ablation, your principle is perfectly true.
If we are to be brothers, let us be brothers for life, die together.
"Imagine what you might say to a man who expressed the same opinion of the uncut female genitalia"
Nope. I can't imagine it. It would never happen. Straight guys love that stuff.
"you've grown up accustomed to seeing the mutilated penis"
I understand that.
"Men in areas of the world where female genital mutilation is practiced just need to get over their preference"
Female mutilation is the result of a male dominated society hellbent on supressing women's enjoyment of sex and their need to own their women. The circumsicion tradion has very different origins.
Why does anyone need to get over their prefence anyway? We all have things we are attracted to and things that we aren't. We're just talking here.
Redheads not warheads
"Female mutilation is the result of a male dominated society hellbent on supressing women's enjoyment of sex and their need to own their women. The circumsicion tradion has very different origins."
The Western custom of non-religious male circumcision came about when Victorian doctors began pushing for circumcision of infants, in order to reduce (supposedly) the male sex drive and eliminate masturbation. Not so totally different, especially when you consider that similar procedures were done on girls & women, in Britain and the U.S., for much the same reasons. Girls had clitoridectomies paid for by Blue Cross well past the mid-20th century. It's not a men vs. women thing, not in this part of the world, at least. It's a question of not being so fearful of our sexuality, male or female, that we resort to extremes like these.
"Why does anyone need to get over their prefence anyway? We all have things we are attracted to and things that we aren't."
There are very few sexual preferences that I wouldn't wholeheartedly support the active enjoyment of. However, one that requires unconsenting children to submit to cosmetic genital surgery without anesthetic is one of the exceptions.
The dead do not recognize context.
>"Nope. I can't imagine it. It would never happen. Straight guys love that stuff."
It does happen in countries where female circumcision is normal. Guys are revolted by uncut female genitals.
>"Female mutilation is the result of a male dominated society hellbent on supressing women's enjoyment of sex and their need to own their women. The circumsicion tradion has very different origins."
It wasn't designed by women, but it was still designed to reduce sexual pleasure, so I'd say that's very much a similar origin.
Anyway, I'm glad you're smart enough to realise that just because you have your adult preference, doesn't mean that preference should be forced upon babies who don't have a say in it!
your vagina prolly looks like a scary reptile! or a stale fish taco. probably smells like one too.
but I guess that doesnt stop the guys from entering it, with or without foreskin lol
women's privates look like a freaking alien....Ever see predator? spaceship troopers? that alien at the end?
i know you just said you are for foreskin rights but i always find it horrible how women complain about how foreskins look when you have a weird looking alien hambuger between your legs
ironic
[deleted]
We are foreskin brothers, captainbryce. Can you believe that there are still people in America who permit themselves such bigotted language about a part of the anatomy GOD PUT THERE?
How long is yours? (Foreskin, I mean.) Mine, almost TWO FULL INCHES beyond the end of King P. It makes Moslems and Jews (and New Jersey atheists) turn green.
If we are to be brothers, let us be brothers for life, die together.
Redheads not warheads
I'll admit to being moderately impressed.
The dead do not recognize context.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
It's piquant to a degree to see SheBear defend a Bronze-age sacerdotal rite adopted by the surgical patriarchy in Victorian America for entirely irrational unscientific reasons.
There is nothing cosmetic about circumcision. If instead of being practised by an empowered majority it were the custom of an unpopular, powerless minority, the vegefascists would be on it like locust.
If we are to be brothers, let us be brothers for life, die together.
As much as I love being piquant I don't believe I defended any such thing but whatevs.
Redheads not warheads
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
I was very happy to learn I was one of the few people from Mexico who are circumcized. My family did it for medical reasons (my dad is a doctor). I'll agree that you're removing part of it that can be more sensitive and provide more pleasure (although now the world seems to be obsessed with delaying orgasm). However, I am glad that I can avoid the negatives. Mainly:
1) Hygiene - like it's been said time and again on this thread, it's constant cleaning or dealing with rashes, infections, odors, etc.
2) Cuts, tears and scrapes from manipulating it (whether it's for pleasure or just day to day activities and bumps).
3) Stenosis of the foreskin, which is a narrowing of the foreskin that occurs with cuts and tears. When it heals, it contracts slightly and it can get to a point where it can't slip over the head anymore without tearing or being very painful, sometimes to the point where you can only move it enough to go to the bathroom, which is why you have people who get circumcized as adults (not including those converting to Judaism).
I wouldn't put it in par with female circumcision as "torture" or "barbarism" because would be more along the lines of removing the penis entirely and preventing you from having ANY pleasure whatsoever. It's perhaps less sensitive but I wouldn't know because I don't know what it's like to have it and I'm pretty happy with what I have.
I've heard people also compare it to body hair, a lot of which we grew because we needed protection from the elements. It's possible foreskin merely shielded the penis from the elements. If that's so, then my briefs are my foreskin.