bogus rating


The rating for this complete bogus! there are 14 votes for "1" and 12 for "10" then there are other votes ranging from "9" to "5". Those 14 votes for "1" are the people that voted before they even saw the movie becasue they just hated the movie! People went and voted before they even saw it just becasue they hated the first or just hate lower buget movies. Some of the votes may have been peple that saw it and hated it but then agzin it all depends on what type of movies you like. see the movie before you vote!

reply

i've seen the first one.

thats enough. this should never have been made. i dont care it will suck

reply

the 2nd one is not as bad!

reply

That's like saying Stalin wasnt as bad as Hitler

reply

i've seen the first one.

thats enough. this should never have been made. i dont care it will suck

what you doing on the messageboard then?

reply

[deleted]

Hey Teejay71592, you sure are all over the Terror Toons 2 boards defending/shilling this movie. Good money says you are probably part of the production. Geeze, do you guys really think that by pretending to be us common folk and lying to us about a flick you'll be able to trick us out of our hard earned money? Part 1 was bad enough, especially with Lizzy Borden playing a 5 year old kid or whatever young age she was supposed to be (albeit, she was the only bright spot in the first movie). The second flick may have a larger cast and "larger" budget, but it was still bad. I'm not one to bash other people's opinions, but when a movie is as undeserving of the defense this one is getting from you, it becomes fairly obvious what you're trying to accomplish.

http://www.anti-christ.biz/ The Anti-Christ has arisen in all his satirical glory!

reply

I'm deff not part of the production team if thats wat u think...I just don't see y people have to base thier rating on the 2nd just because they hated the 1st. The 2nd is alot better and if don't want to go watch it then don't go rate it as a 1 becasue u hated the 1st! It reallyy pisses me off. I got on this board right after I saw the movie to show my support for movies like this that work really hard on what they can make based on thier budget. And when people come on here and bash them for what isn't a 20 million dollar budget movie, it just shows how rude people can be. I emailed Joe Castro when I got the DVD (autographed by the way) and I told what a great job he did and that i really enjoyed it. He replyed back and said that was exactly what he need to hear that day. It's not like they tricked you into thining it was some glorious (once again) 20 million dollar budget movie. You know its a low-budget movie, but watch it anyway expecting hollywood perfection. That's a shame.

reply

why about halfway through this movie did the main brunette girl suddenly make out with the guy?

that didn't make any sense because they went from running away from the two monsters and then cut right to this scene in the most abrupt and nonsensical way. there was no sense in them doing that at that moment when they were running for their lives.

reply

i voted one...i watch both the original and this one.. *beep* THESE MOVIES.

the acting is terrible
the sets are terrible
the effects are terrible


id say the first one is better.. but thats not saying much on how *beep* terrible this is the story is and *beep* everything

the basic thought is cool,cartoons in the real wold killing people in cartoon ways.. *beep* terrible execution

i usually respect everyones work and say I'm just not into it.. this is just complete *beep* film and .. god why do they have to make another

reply

i saw this before the original, which i'm not too keen on... but i love the sick and silly show, kind of like a twisted low budget beetlejuice, i LOVE the masks, Gretel is especially creepy in this.

reply

You have to take into account a lot of things though, you can't judge an independent movie on blockbuster standards, a lot of hollywood films are made for one reason: PROFIT. Scripts are changed, and actors fired, the original creation can become nothing like the writer intended, all this is done to promote mass market appeal.

When you sit and watch an independent film, like Terror Toons 2, you are taking a trip through the mind of the director, i don;t think anyone is taking this movie 'seriously': because it's not a serious movie, next time you pick out a movie to watch, try reading the back of the box and looking at the cover. I mean, look at the title of the movie... The box clearly conveys the kind of movie this is.

I like a lot of movies that the 'general public' would agree are excellent films, as well as a lot of more cult movies. Terror Toons 2 isn;t even a movie i like because it's bad, i genuinely think it's a great film, all of the friends i have shown it to agree with me, most of who'm watch it with their jaws dropped most of the way through.

When i watch a film like this i think about how much work and effort has been put into it, all the props and sets and costumes, unless i am mistaken, didn't the director do all/most of it himself? The countless hours of work with no promise of pay, all for the end product, that is what motivates a good filmaker/artist, if i ever created something this crazy and funny and original i would be *beep* proud of myself.

reply

Um, how do you know they didn't the ths movie? Maybe the 12 people who voted "10" never saw it either? Your entire concept makes no sense without any sort of proof. (BTW, I liked the 1st one, but haven't had a chance to see this one yet.)

reply

The 1's are not bogus ratings...Just Saying

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2604794/

reply

Joe Castro is that you?

reply