MovieChat Forums > State of Play (2003) Discussion > David Morrissey as Stephen Collins

David Morrissey as Stephen Collins


His character's intriguingly complex: driven, ambitious, self-involved, impulsive, childish; both principled and immoral, and, amazingly, mostly sympathetic. I liked and felt for Stephen most of the time. But by the end, I'd had enough of him. Some of that may have been the writing: it's extremely difficult for an actor to sustain the audience's sympathy when it's greeted by an endless series of his character's half-truths and poor judgment. But part of my final antipathy for Stephen was due to Morrissey--he doesn't do anguish well, and unfortunately Stephen is anguished half the time.

There was much I liked about Stephen that Morrissey brought to him: his virility, his straightforwardness, his integrity (in certain areas). He comes across as a guy's guy, intrinsically likable. The hearing scene when he so effectively rebutted that obnoxious American oil industry shill was terrific--it made me see why Stephen was considered a rising star in the party. But it would probably take Streep or Penn to keep you interested in a character who's racked with pain & guilt for hours on end.

reply

I thought he did a remarkable job, his final scene with John Simm was masterful from both actors.

Second chances are rare man, you shoud learn to take better advantage of em'

reply

All that handwringing is your idea of masterful? Uhhh..okay.

reply

Penn and/or Streep would immediately force me to change channel I'm afraid. I'm sure everybody and his dog is quite right when they say that they are good actors but I'm afraid it always seems like overacting and mugging for sympathy to me.
I like SoP because none of the characters are intrinsically good or bad (except for the hitman I guess), none of them are entirely victims or attackers. Everyone is doing what they think is right at that particular time, in their world, with their outlook, state of mind and personal and professional priorities. Noone is a martyr. I just can't stand martyrs - they are a 2 dimensional concept that doesn't really exist in the real world IMO and don't have any place in a realistic drama.

reply

[deleted]

I thought he was pretty much flawless.

I'm glad I saw him first in Our Mutual Friend in which he creeped me out with every new scene. Collins was somewhat like Bradley Headstone (in MF), just remove all the confidence and self respect. Easy to say but I would imagine difficult for an actor to pull off.

I have newfound respect for him.





"Go back to your own side Mr. Leamas."

reply

think stephen dillane would have done the role well too.



"Hipness is not a state of mind, it's a fact of life!" - Cannonball Adderley

reply

I don't even remember this movie

Don't start in on the NBA Finals. Someone else is already doing it.

reply

I confess I didn't find the Collins character 'intrinsically likeable' in the slightest and he never elicited much sympathy from me. He seemed to me an utterly unattractive, self-centered, charmless boor. I found it implausible that Cal would be so devoted to him or that either of the two women involved would have fallen in love with or married him. I think the series would have benefited from a Collins character who had at least some saving grace - even Alan B'stard MP could be witty! It would also have helped suspense if we had not from the beginning had a Collins character who was so obviously the right type to be responsible for his researcher's death.

I beseech ye in the bowels of Christ, think that ye may be mistaken.

reply

Collins was plausible but charmless always whinging about something.

It's that man again!!

reply