Interesting to see just how bad a movie can be.
That's about all that can be said about this 200 million dollar garbage.
shareKing Kong '33 still remains unbeaten, what a great movie.
shareit does, truly a masterpiece and completely entertaining, I remember being in awe watching it on tv even before I seriously got into cinema.
shareTo each his own. I love all versions for different reasons. And Jackson’s version is hardly a bad one. Whatever shortcomings he had with the film I think he definitely achieved one thing successfully - and that was that he made Kong feel real. Kong looked totally believable through his physical behavior and emotions. I mean sometimes I was forgeting that I was looking at CGI and was totally invested in Kong as a character without suspending disbelief. Kong looked and behaved like a real gorilla for what you can’t say much with other King Kong movies, and I think that’s important and is the strength of this movie.
shareThe OP is known for consistently posting negative shit. For whatever reason he felt compelled to make not just one but three threads here on the first page about how bad he thinks this movie is. Pretty sure he's just a troll.
I agree with you that Kong has what it takes to get the audience emotionally invested. I am always able to suspend my disbelief and I still remember his death making one of my exes cry when we were watching the film together.
If anything, the movie is UNDERrated. It's not a masterpiece, but it's certainly a well-made and effective adventure film.