Original?


Someone told me this is a remake of a recent non-English language film. Does anyone know the original title/language? Has anyone seen it? Is it better, worse, about the same?

Thanks!

reply

Yes..it is a remake of a Japanese movie from 1996 of the same title (Shall We Dansu? in Japanese)

http://imdb.com/title/tt0117615/

This movie is one of those times where they take a good idea from a good movie and try to capitalize on it with big names and big budgets.
Go out and rent Shall We Dansu (though it's only on VHS). Probably soon to be on DVD when the US Ver hits DVD (just as Ringu did with The Ring)

reply

[deleted]

The Original is much much much better.........just go and get the dvd!

reply

The remake is far superior to the original. The original is too serious. There is far more humor in the remake and better acting.

reply

The remake is far superior to the original. The original is too serious. There is far more humor in the remake and better acting.


Er - more humor does not a better movie make. Would you consider taking, say, The Godfather, making a version with more jokes, and calling it "better"? (Godfather fans, please don't hate me, it's just an example. :) )

Your second point has been discussed ad nauseum on these boards and others, so I will leave it alone for now.m

I happen to agree with everyone else - the original is many times better and well worth the subtitles. And it's not at all unfunny.

~Sarah

reply

I think the Japanese version is better but I was plesantly suprised with the remake cause I thought it was gonna be bad but it was okay.

reply

This has nothing to do with anything, but I just cannot believe your name is George Glass! I was just watching that movie yesterday. O.O

~Sarah

reply

The original is infinately superior to the remake and is quite humourous.
I must admit the remake was far better then i expected, but it pales in comparison in every conceivable way to the original.

reply

Because it wasn't made in Japan, right .

For those people (like you) that think Japan can do no wrong and everyone should stop "ripping off" need to buy a clue and get a life. Japanese productions have taken many a western production and gutted the heart and soul from them at a higher rate than the west has with Japanese productions.

-------------------------------------

End Hypocrisy...Increase tolerance...shoot a fanboy today.

reply

You're an American, are you?

The original had a point, namely how one man decided to go against the grain and dance, with a woman who is not his wife, in a country where even teenagers are hesitant to hold hands in public.

Now, I haven't seen the remake, but I can't see how it has any sort of relevance in a society like ours. Never mind the fact that I hate J. Lo and have never been impressed by Gere in the slightest.

reply

I agree that the society behaviors from the original add a lot to Shall We Dansu. It does have a serious tone but that makes those rare moments of humor even better. There were many times in the American remake where I felt like the movie was trying too hard to make things funny and it fell short of its aims.

The subtitles of the original aren't too bad when you get used to them. At first it was a struggle to get used to both since it's been so long since I'd last seen a foreign film but I got so into the film that I could watch the movie and read the subtitles simultaneously.

reply

[deleted]

the japanese are not known for their humour. it's a different culture altogether, it may not appeal to everyone but the films are quite different in their approaches


reply

I liked them both.

I saw the original first, when it came on HBP I think it was. There was this charm to it that wasn't really recreated in the American version.

But I liked the American version too. Richard Gere and Susan Sarandon did a great job. I am just really glad they didn't go all Hollywood and have Lopez and Gere sleep together.

Mocking Greenly Productions

reply

The original is very good - it's why Hollywood capitalized on it and made their version. One of the things it had going for it was that you were unfamiliar with the Japanese actors and they appeared as 'regular Joes' so it seemed so much more realistic. As for the humor, it certainly is there - it's just not that forced over-sized Hollywood humor. It's subtle and real-world. For instance, where the main character goes to his first social/practice dance and attempts to dance for the first time and just stands there on the floor staring at his feet unable to move. The scene is hilarious. It's real.

But perception is everything. If you've never seen the original, then I guess the Hollywood version is OK. If you've seen the first, then the remake just does not capture the charm and magic of the original; for me, anyways. You can see the original on Netflix (when it's there) or Amazon, etc.

reply

The original is quite excellent and has an underlying social commentary that's amiss in the remake, which is a gem of a movie itself. It lacks the depth of the Japanese film, but it's charming and sweet, with great performances and the ability to feel goof without being contrived in the obvious ways.

NOW TARZAN MAKE WAR!

reply

I just watched the original this weekend, after a ton of viewings of the remake, and enjoyed both of them. A little bit difficult because of subtitles, but after a while, you don't even realize you're reading them.

As for similarities and differences, I found that the remake followed the original very well, and there weren't too many differences. However, I liked the remake more. Perhaps it's because of the actors (obsessed with Stanley Tucci), perhaps it's the fact that I didn't have to read subtitles. But a lot of it was because I thought the remake gave the minor characters more to work with, and I found myself more interested in them because of it. Stanley Tucci's character of Link was more fleshed out than the character of Aoki. Similar things, but just a bit more meat in his story. You learned far more about Vern, and he had a great deal more personality. For Chick, you just got the impression of a very hyper, happy kind of guy in the original, not the way it is in the remake. I also liked the fact that the wife had a great job.

But one of the biggest reasons was the relationship between the character of John Clark and the dance teacher. In the original, it seemed that if he had a chance, he might have slept with the teacher. But in the remake, you see that it was never about lust with John and Paulina. She was just expressing things that he felt deep down, but was ashamed of.

Both were great movies, and I impressed and enjoyed both, but for me, I just preferred the remake a little more. And I absolutely adored the part where they played Book of Love while he's getting ready for the final scene.

"Oh my God! You put a living room where the crack den used to be!"

reply