MovieChat Forums > Hellbent (2006) Discussion > Questions -- so much is eilliptical in t...

Questions -- so much is eilliptical in this supposedly 'simple' flick


Questions, questions: What's the point of the hero's missing right eye? Why does the devil/slasher have it in his mouth at the end of the film? How did the slasher survive a bullet through his head? Why would a paramedic say something as idiotic as "don't take the mask off; he's pretty badly messed up under there; you don't want to see that." Almost as idiotic is his remark, when asked if the villain is still alive, "Don't worry; he's as useless as a carrot."

This movie -- for all its innovation in bringing a piebald genre into a new sociology -- is weirdly flaccid(!). The performances are so numbingly lowkey. The director, wanting to evade stereotypes, appears to have cajoled these actors into a catatonic, PC "anti-flamboyance."

reply

I agree with your last paragraph. I thought this could have/should have been so much better than what it was, especially for being the first of its kind. I enjoyed it, but it just fell kind of flat.

I think the missing eye was to establish a backs story/development for the protagonist, and for shock value during that chase scene. As for all of your other questions, I have NO idea either lol and some of the dialogue (the paramedic as you mentioned) was TERRIBLE. They could've done the ending a lot better.

reply

[deleted]

I didn't say anything was wrong with the characters...

reply

[deleted]