MovieChat Forums > Hellraiser: Hellworld (2005) Discussion > *spoiler* comments on the ending(s)

*spoiler* comments on the ending(s)


As I was watching this movie, I'm thinking about how terrible it is in regards to the use of cenobites and the hellraiser mythology etc etc.

Then when it turns out they were all drugged (not going to go into timelines for drugging plot holes or discussions on how the Host got each of their unconscious bodies out of the house and buried them while the party was going on) and everything is explained as the characters hallucinations - that worked for me. It wasn't really that Pinhead hacked that guys head off with a hatchet for example - the cenobites encounters were all imagined events in the kids heads.

Fine...ok - my problem with the movie is generally voided. In hindsight now I don't have a problem with that.

It would have been fine if the movie ended with the explanation - the two kids that are still alive are left buried and trapped - thats pretty horrifying. The transition between her hallucination of the host with the shovel and the actual rescue of the police was a cool shot. The kids being saved was the second logical ending point - yay happy ending - too bad the Host got away.

Then they show a scene with the Host and the Lament Configuration. He accidentally (I guess) solves it and the Cenobites appear and cut him up. Decent gore scene. But it really felt tacked on - like they figured that hellraiser fans would be disappointed that the Cenobites never really were in the movie (only hallucinations) so they decided to have one scene where the "real" cenobites show up. It also gives us a scene where the host gets whats coming to him so we feel better as an audience that the "bad guy" didn't get away with what he did.

I can see for those reasons why THAT scene was in there. Although the cenobites are more about the suffering that just instantaneously killing those that open the box...

THEN - they tacked on the fourth ending - the driving scene at the end, where the Host appears in the backseat of their SUV. What the ****! I see absolutely no reason for that scene whatsoever. The first logical ending would have been great - the second one probably ideal - the third one to satiate hellraiser fans and gorehounds alike. But the fourth and final ending scene of the movie was simultaneously cliched and unneccessary and made NO sense.

Your thoughts appreciated.

reply

Didn't you think Henry Cavill (Mike) was hot? Do you have the dvd? Can you post clips of him? Do you know someone who can help us (Ashlee, Rox, Angelina and me)?

reply

[deleted]

Okay

reply

I just read it. I replied. It would be SO AWESOME!

reply

ok. great.

Check out my work on deviantart.com

reply

[deleted]

..... We are just asking for clips. We don't want to derail threads. I know we're talking a lot, but not a lot of people come on this board. So, if anyone comes on here, they can help us a little. Also, Henry Cavill is not just a prettyboy actor. He's a really good actor. I saw him in The Count of Monte Cristo and in Tristan + Isolde and he was amazing! Sorry if we bother you that much Lead_Cenobite.

reply

Actually, yes, we do. And I mainly admire him for his acting skills and personality traits. So don't give me hell about it, ok? And trust me, if I could, I WOULD RENT THE DAMN MOVIE!!!!!!!!

Check out my work on deviantart.com

reply

Me too!

reply

Believe me, as much as you like the kid, renting the movie isn't worth it.

It's a complete waste of time and money and an assault on good taste.

And a completely offensive piece of tripe to anyone who calls themself a Hellraiser fan.

Hopelessly in love with Uma Thurman, Maggie Gyllenhaal, and Emmy Rossum

reply

Well, not a complete waste of money if you didn't like it. At Family Video it's in the 2 for a dollar section. Though, I'm surprised it's not in the almsot new section. There are older ones than this one in there. hmm.

reply

[deleted]

Some of you people are so ignorant. No ones even responded to the topic.

Now...I dont normally post on here...but whatever.

I really...love...this movie. Its much much better than Hellseeker. But that isnt the point.

The last ending was absolutely rediculous. It made NO sense, and leaves a bad last impression of the movie. It was ok showing him die (although I would have prefered if that wasnt included).

I think that this movie was really well thought out. Having them drugged, and having all the cenobites just in their imagination was great. This movie (And Inferno) are highly underrated.

reply

Well, you've pretty much written down, word for word, what I think about the endings.

I mean, by the time the kids started getting killed I was hating the movie.. I don't have any fun watching those teen-slasher (SAW, Hostel, and whatnot) movies, as they're always basically the same (lame) thing.

Then when the truth about the drugging and burying was exposed (it was hinted before, as we saw some shots of the characters looking out of the breathing pipes, tho it made no sense at the time), it have the movie at least a little bit of a redeeming quality.

For some reason the writer didn't want to give it a "sad ending", so the two silly teens were rescued.. I thought "well, so that's the end.. a really bad movie, but at least it's not that bad an ending..". Only at this point it was not, after all, a hellraiser movie, as it seemed to happen in a world where the HR mythos is just a horror story.

Then there was the host's death scene. So now it WAS a hellraiser movie.. the worst one of the all, what with the boring teen-slashing, but I guess they had to justify the title somehow.

And the actual, last, ending, was just lame.

reply

yah I agree, it seemed like a teen slasher until the host was killed, miss the use of chains tho. They could of avoided the car scene entirely.

reply

yep, the driving ending makes no sense whatsoever

Is this it?

reply

The only thing that makes less sense than the silly ghost-in-the-backseat ending is the fact that these two characters suddenly fall completely in love with one another and decide to strike out in some attempt to start a new life together.

That just comes completely out of nowhere. It's like the dolts writing the script just know that other films have ended this way, so they shoehorn it into the plot without attempting to actually develop the characters even slightly in order to accommodate this sudden major character change.

reply

Having just rewatched "Hellworld" (it's my favorite of the direct-to-video sequels, and I sometimes feel like one of the only people to really like it), I interpreted the ending as meaning that the surviving couple were still dying and buried alive, as the hallucination implies. Maybe that's obvious to everybody. I thought it was an interesting editing choice to show Lance Henriksen killed by the Cenobites and then show him (or an illusion/memory of him) still around, haunting the survivors by revealing the falseness of their happy ending.

reply