MovieChat Forums > Royal Rumble (2003) Discussion > Scott Steiner vs. Triple H

Scott Steiner vs. Triple H


I know most people don't care for this match, but I watched it yesterday for the first time since it aired live in January of 2003, and you know what? It's not that bad...
Sure, it has a botched spot or two(or three), and the ending is a bit of a letdown, but there are some great moments. Steiner's relentless suplexes delivered to perfection each time........An incredible neck breaker from Triple H to Steiner (The best way I can describe it, is like a diamond cutter, but the person getting the move done to them lands on their back. It probably wasn't supposed to happen, but it looked great.)..........Another great moment happens when Triple H is on the ground and Steiner drops to the ground as well and starts doing his push-ups right in Triple H's face........ This match wasn't as bad as some would have you believe. Steiner is an awesome character and WWE needs to put him back in a good story. Just give this match a chance.

reply

[deleted]

Steiner is the man... but the WWE has released them now. Stupid idiots.

I liked the match. It had a few things that didnt quite sell, but *beep*, what fight is perfect anyway? I just couldnt believe it when I start hearing ''TRIPLE H!'' and ''STEINER SUCKS'' chants from the crowd, though. Dont they know who the heel is, damn it?!

IMO, the worst bit was in the end when Steiner's thong... was showing. I thought that was humiliating.


Sill, Steiner's one of my fave wrestlers ever.

reply

Steiner does suck! He used to be good back in WCW but in this match he could BARELY MOVE. All he did were suplexes and barely sold anything Triple H did and was on offense for almost the entire match. It was funny cuz the crowd cheered him when he first came out and ended up progressively hating him more and more throughout the match.

reply

If they had wrestled around 1999 or 2000 it would of been a good match.

reply