What is real and what isn't

Do you have a source reference for this? Not that I don't believe you, it's just always nice to have stuff confirmed :)

I'm still a little amazed Gry would do this, but I guess in the name of art... why the hell not.

---
"Ed and I drove around for hours for no particular reason. We came up empty."

On the DVD commentary, producer Nicolas Barbano says of Gry Bay and Thomas Raft's sex scene: 'These people are not porn actors. They are legitimate mainstream actors with a mainstream background. These people really have intercourse and this is extremely unusual... In this scene Thomas Raft actually has an orgasm. He ejaculates inside Gry Bay which she was very annoyed about and has been complaining about ever since.'
He later talks about the director Jessica Nilsson's unwillingness to shoot the hardcore performances as explicitly as possible.
In another commentary co-stars Mark Stevens and Eileen Daly comment on Gry Bay's reluctance to fully expose her body during the explicit scenes.
So the answer to the question of this thread seems to be... it's all real, but it's not all shown.

apart from the real sex scenes.this was agood movie.
cry is a good actress

Drilling is not a science, it's an art

the movie was just plain ugly. gry was sure hot, no doubt. but the movie was just plain ugly. almost everything about it was wrong. most, if not all of it, didn't make sense. it was highly unrealistic, here's a few stuff that felt wrong:

1. the love between Anna and Johan was not emphasized enough so the audience ddnt really feel Anna's pain when Johan left.
2. why did this Johan dude cut the communication between them for 5 years? if he loved her dearly as what the movie suggests, why?
3. what's up with the big time french director dude? did he just waste a whole lot of time and money just to get into Anna's pants? very unlikely.
4. Frank erased Johan's number on the wall. Johan just decided not to appear again because apparently, Anna ddnt call her. he couldve went back to Anna's apartment (which he has access on) and checked her out again. it would be dumb of him to think that Anna doesnt like him anymore because they just did it in the kitchen.
5. Johan told Anna the reason why he decided to rent her apartment - it was so he can see her again. well, the reason why it became vacant is because she's leaving for france. so it was pointless.
6. Anna chose over 50 persons to be her flatmate. she chose Camila. does that mean the other 50 are worse than Camila? Anna also said that the reason why she chose Camila is because they are almost the same. which clearly they are not.
7. why would they show Frank removing his condom while he's talking to his mother on the phone? highly inappropriate.

these are just a few. the whole movie has a goal, yeah. but the way it was put together was just awkwardly wrong. everything is - the music, the cinematography, the script. so yeah.

I'm still yet to see a good film with an interesting story that also features real (unsimulated) and exciting sex. Surely SOMEONE is capable? I know it would entertain a lot of people. Something like Ronin, with Bobby D nailing Natascha McElhone a few times during the film. Or Last Tango, but with real sex. How boring must it have been to dry hump Maria Schneider and prattle on about butter?

The manifesto is not a bad idea, but they could at least show the penetration. I know a lot of women who would love to see that.

i can't decide what's more embarrassing about puzzy power, the films or the manifesto. really shallow, unintelligent, talentless stuff. and horribly unsexy.