I Cant Wait

Really? That's a shame. But what roles were local other than the extras? I looked at the credits and and they all sound like they are already professional. Could extras have made it that bad? Which part was portrayed poorly? Wow, bummer! I have a kid that was an extra and I'm saddened to think it won't go to the theaters. AH hell, it was fun anyway.

That's not true. There were actually quite a bit of professionals who were used in this production. And yes there were some Pheonix kids used but come on everyone has to start somewhere. You say they ruined the production? I'd like to know what sorce you're getting all this from.

What a pity to be so negative, & I see you did not reply to the person who asked where you got your information. As the cast had not even seen the amended film at this time I think your remarks are to say the least premature. I'm still waiting eagerly for its release in Britain.
Sue

I'm afraid that you are wrong. This movie had actors that have gone to acting school and have been in live theatre productions and have gotten awards for their acting. Don't talk about what you don't know. you have probably gotten a private message from me but it was from one of the actors. It wasn't me. If you are going to write bad stuff about what you don't know don't write.

shadowking013

Jut saw the movie with my son and he enjoyed it (no, I'm not associated with the film - just wanted to support a local film). The problem here is really the story. It's very flawed. Every screenplay has a protagonist (who the story is about) and in this case there are too many. Secondly, the protagonist must have a challenge, a problem, some obstacle to overcome that becomes the focus. Again, too many protagonists and too many problems, none of which took center stage. Thirdly, the protagonist must be resonsible for his own solution. Brooke's problem: wants the girl. He takes no action. He doesn't do anything to win her back and the solution comes to him (she returns voluntarily). He's too passive. Brent's problem is a bully who really doesn't appear to target Brent specifically. His way of getting even is too simple. BAD's change of heart is abrupt and without convincing reason. Jerry's problem is resolved by a mere "talking to" by Brooke and Brent's dad rather than resulting from rising tension that leads to a "turning point" event. Resolutions are too simple, not challenging and spread out over far too many protagonists.

The assumed protagonists are the Butler (is that their name) family who are pratically perfect in every way. Where's the conflict? Where's the challenge? They seem to simply move about the film making everybody else happy.

I'm very aware that this was done on a shoe-string budget and am willing to cut everybody some slack. But the main problem is story structure and development. It just isn't there.

After a lengthy discussion with a few of my more film-inclined friends, I am forced to dock my given score by about 3 points. I hated to do it, and even more so to go back on what I said previously, but there was a very simple statement brought to my attention by a certain "Jaster."

"Ten being Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, and one being Weekend at Bernie's 2" - Jaster

LoL there is no arguing with the logic presented to me. The re-vamp of the score is a 2/10. Sorry.

It's interesting to think that a movie can mean so much to some people and so little to others. I can understand how you may rate a movie and even agree with your score, but I feel that since I was actually in the movie that I have a fair perspective.

My son, his friend and another classmate were also in the movie as featured extras. Since the parents were required to transport each day to and from the set, we all saw the same impact that "Hollywood" had on these inexperienced actors. I agree that the movie was below average and that the local production company was sub-par. The actual crew on set were great, but management fell way short in "Hollywood" standards.

I believe that Bill Blair is a business man who doesn't throw away money. After all, he used to own many "Blair Cinemas"! If he thought there was potential to make a profit at the same time include local non-professional actors then his mission was fulfilled. His budget must have been between one and two million dollars, so even if he DVD produces and Blockbuster releases this movie, then he will still come out ahead.

My grief is for all of the local extras who were given "Hollywood" opportunities in a brown bag! The local production company along with the casting directors were the flaws, not the script, nor the local talent.

There was a local "previewing" in Tempe, AZ, around late April 2003. This may have been the only opportunity for the "local" talent to ever see themselves on the "silver screen" and the local production failed to reach these kids or their parents for this viewing. They were sure to make promises to these children while "shooting" each day, that "tomorrow" they will be in major scenes and each day, faithfully, the parents drove hours and stayed hours for their child's opportunity.

We were never contacted along with many other local people that we already knew and other local people we met on the set. This is the disappointment about "Arizona Summer": It is a movie about families and about people who care but the movie can't help but reflect in the production, the truth about the "behind-the-scenes" story. People don't care.

I hope this film doesn't stay shelved for the sake of the children who sweated each 12-hour day in 108 degree temperatures.

Good luck and may you see the truth and impact of a good story gone bad, all because of poor management.

<end of reply>

That's wonderful news! I hope people will appreciate it as much as some of us did who were lucky enough to have participated in it. As I have said before, from the audition process to the screening, everyone involved was as sweet as could be. I hope things go well for all involved, what a terrific bunch of people!