Their stance on 9/11
I agree with almost everything they comment on, and respect their opinions and views on the subjects I don't agree on, but whenever they bring up 9/11 I want to break the TV. How can two level-headed fellows such as them be dead set against the idea of 9/11 being an inside job, or, at the very least, that the Government knew ahead of time that it was going to happen? I think the facts that the memo was on Bush's desk, that policies were changed at the Pentagon hours before the planes hit and that a billion-dollar insurance policy was taken out on the WTC a few weeks beforehand are all proof that SOMEONE knew ahead of time.
Aside from that, there are just overwhelming details against the official story, and that each new piece of evidence points away from said story being true. I learned a long time ago that when new evidence starts coming to light, it almost always points in the direction of the truth. Hell, the fact that 1/3rd of the people the Government claims hijacked the planes were alive and well weeks after the attacks should tell them something, shouldn't it? "Oh, we incorrectly read the passenger manifests and almost ruined the lives of these people by labeling them terrorists. Oops." That's... ahem... *beep*
Now that I think about it, most "conspiracy theories" they address have much more truth to them than they claim... the UFO situation, especially. As a person who has seen one, I find it both hilarious and sad that P&T are with the "it's just swamp gas, you moron" crowd.