MovieChat Forums > Chik loh dak gung (2002) Discussion > What's the deal with this movie? Lots o...

What's the deal with this movie? Lots of hot nude Asian women?


My local video store always has this film on the shelf but in a nutshell can you tell me what the hell is it about?



I'm building a time machine so I can meet the 1983 Phobe Cates!

reply

Side-boob at best.

Funny regardless.

reply

There was one nude scene. Lots of scantily clad hot women though.

reply


"Seduction".
-------------------
KOU SHIBASAKI FORUM
http://s9.invisionfree.com/Kou_Shibasaki_Forum/

reply

They keep the film in a nutshell?

reply

bascially just pretty girls (not nude) wrapped in a stupid script, bad writing and stupid lines.
Looks good though.

not worth watching unless you NEED to see it because of the girls.

4/10 - 4 because of the girls.

SPOILER AHEAD:

Actually watching it as I'm writing this - I will revise to 3/10 as it just got more stupid.... after her best and only friend is kidnapped, she choose to have sex with a policeman on a beach (yes, RIGHT after) ... oh yes, but that is normal because she is drugged.
Even better - they are on unknow BEACH, and she leaves a letter to the policeman.. where the h. did she get paper and a pencil from??? just retarded.

reply

and yes...very windy movie ... TOOOO windy.

reply

Appalling movie. I only bought it to get a cheap deal ona 3 for $50 promotion.

And I regret that.

reply

Actually, if you are paying attention she was drugged with, as described by the Assassinator, yes, I said that to describe the killer of assassins, with an aphrodisiac drug, so she was feeling a bit frisky, thus the sex. The CIA agent is basically a cop, with less legal constraints, as cops we are taught to always have a pen and paper with us at all times, so that is where she got the means to write the note. The only continuity goof is why wasn't the paper salt water stained/wrinkled? Other than that everything else makes sense. Just my 2 cents.

reply

Well, she got dunked into the water by the cop and "woke up".

And then she tells him she "knows what she's doing". And then the sex begins.

And you can see the awkwardness at her and the cop trying so hard to cover up the nipples from every angle while getting intimate.

Just funny. =p

reply

The idea behind this video is very similar to the theme behind the movie Nikita. This villain kidnaps young girls, and trains them to be ruthless assasins.

The movie is centered about Charlene, played by Maggie Q (I wrote Madame Q by mistake there at first, hehe). The romantic interest is Jack (Daniel Wu), and Charlene has a friend, Katt (Anya Wu). They are the main characters.

The movie is very stylish. There is a lot of kung fu fighting, in the style of many Hong Kong movies. If you've seen Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, you know what I mean.

Most people on this board seem to think this is a bad movie, but I started watching it because there were lots or beatiful women, and ended up thinking it was a good movie with very good fight scenes.

The producer has added a very nasty rape scene. Nothing graphic is shown, but it's very very nasty. Some people feel the movie would be better if they left that out.

reply

I like the comparison with 'Nikita'. It's interesting that Nikita didn't have any kind of ritual humiliation at all, whereas Naked Weapon has that gang rape scene as you say. But supposing there really was/is an off-the-books international agency hired by important people such as world governments to knock people off. I would bet they would debase and humiliate any female assassins as a necessary step, if those female assassins were going to go out and use their sexuality to assassinate people. Sexual abuse might even seem to be necessary in that context, because most women would naturally repudiate such unnatural actions as seducing someone and sleeping with them just to make it easy to then go and kill them in cold blood. So for these reasons I don't think we can say the rape scene in this film was unnecessary and 'nasty'. It was integral to the plot.

reply

[deleted]