Horrible


There's true bone-tingling horror in this movie, but it has nothing to do with scares or suspense. It's garbage on film and is merely another way for film executives to make another quick buck without trying to be creative. This is the problemn with Hollywood. Money over creativity. I can't believe the man behind the movie is on the boards trying to hype this up. Must be the big promo campaign.

Leprechaun 1 wasn't great, but worked. Then it's a bad sequel, then he's in Vegas, then in the distant future in space, then somehow in the ghetto with Ice-T, now "Bac" to the Hood?" Cult followers, dive right in. But for the love of God, if the writer/director is on this board to pump it up, IT'S THAT BAD. A theatrical release? Who are you kidding? And to compare this hunk of steaming crap to Wes Craven's Freddy, Myers, Jason, or even Chucky is like releasing Saddam back into the wild with 9 billion $$$ and a cache of nukes. Stupid.

I've seen a DVD screener. Gives new meeaning to the word "awful." Bad acting. Bad dialogue. Piss-poor action. Oddly enough, it's funny at moments, but it's not on purpose. Give us all a break and stop wasting money on making garbage and let's get Hollywood to try something new. Thinking and being creative. Not regurjatating a franchise that's failed more than it's succeeded.

reply

If you don't like the films then don't watch them.

reply

^ Amen, my ninja.. LOL

reply

The movie is not Horrible. It gets off to a slow start but pulls you in fast....

reply

Back To Tha Hood may not have been horrible, but it certainly did nothing to help the series. Granted Leprechaun can't exactly be taken seriously, but that's why I have loved the past films, they were tongue-in-cheek comically bad horror with a cheesy but entertaining sense of humor. This one just felt like a stereotypically weak ghetto drama spliced with moments of Leprechaun goodness.

I have no problem with a little focus on the plot, even in a series such as this, but it came at the expense of the Leprechaun. He was given hardly any lines, and most of his kill scenes seemed like they were a last minute thought at best. Even at its worst, the Leprechaun franchise has allowed the titular character to have the spotlight, but here he was used as a means to an end, nothing more. There were a lot of things I liked, especially the opening bit with the creative animation, and the whole Leprechaun/bong scenario was harmlessly hilarious while developing his desire to reclaim the gold, but the vast majority of the film collapsed under the melodramatic schlock that tried to make me care for the protagonists. From my perspective it seems that the film was modeled after the original Leprechaun, only set in 'the hood' (again), making for a horror movie that lacked any even residually creepy settings. There was a severe lack of violence or even remotely "scary" scenes (note I mean scary in the loosest sense) and the humor was resigned to only three or four truly funny scenes (though every time I saw Leprechaun leap from a tree or tackle a character I nearly p*ssed myself).

I understand that this film was a way for a young director to get some experience, but many (not all) that make up the small but cult fanbase want to see what made this such a fun series: the Leprechaun (with his limericks, wit, vengeance and murderous rage all bound together), not a bunch of faceless 'good guys' learning a lesson about greed and love under exceedingly macabre circumstances.

After the initial scene with Warwick Davis and the preacher, the next 20 minutes crawled by setting up a threadbare plot, at which time a buddy of mine watching commented "Dammit, where's the Leprechaun? If I wanted to see a gangsta drama I'd watch Boyz N' Tha Hood". Couple that sentiment with the complete lack of consistency (the Leprechaun uses zero magic throughout the film, yet then conjures up what one can only assume was some heinous voodoo in the fortune-teller's apartment since the director saw fit to leave it out; the main characters are told only clovers and his gold can harm the Leprechaun, yet proceed to try to beat him up and burn him, then when they do use the clover against him it seemingly fails SEVERAL times) and a whole-heartedly unoriginal plot set-up (look at these hard luck ghetto inhabitants get rich, watch rival gangsters plot their demise, look at the torn ex-lovers hiding their true feelings from one another, look at the drug dealer selling to the painfully out-of-touch white man!) and it makes for a stand-alone film that tries hard but has its shortcomings and for a franchise film to succeed in only disappointing those that were excited at the thought of a new film.

For all of its mistakes, Leprechaun In The Hood was a better movie that at least knew it was a bad film and had fun with the Leprechaun while giving the audience what it was looking for, where as Back To Tha Hood lacked any creativity with what to do with him at all.

reply

six reasons this movie should not have been made:
1: with the budget they used on this piece of crap, an entire third world country could eat for a year and still have money left over to buy shoes or a decent porno"
2-6: leprechaun, leprechaun 2, leprechaun in las vegas, leprechaun in space, leprechaun in da hood"

reply

I liked Leprechaun 5 'In the Hood' pretty well, mostly because there were many clever and humorous limericks included which even touched a bit on popular hip-hop style(our superstitios star had picked up the local ethnic jive fast and incorporated it into his lyrically entertaining retort), it was an original and well executed.. entertaining stuff.

This new one had the leprechaun dumbed-down, so instead of the witty comebacks he just falls over a lot and laughs, and the chronic no longer gets his unique lyrical groove flowin'... but it should!

I'm a cool badass.

reply

ninja, pleazeee

lep rocks, except the in space one, that sux bad

reply