Shower in underwear


Can some one explain why a movie that obviously loved photoing half naked men, had them showering in their underwear? And not just in the gang showers, but when showering alone in private showers.

reply

[deleted]

In an interview, David DeCoteau said it was difficult enough to get some actors to strip down to their underwear, so nudity was usually out of the question. So your desire to see the actors displaying their sexual parts for your viewing pleasure will just have to go unfulfilled.

reply

"so your desire . . ' - that seems a little harsh, the commenter didn't express any 'desire', just puzzlement. And it is a little odd - who the hell showers with their underwear on? Yes, I'm sure many if not most of the actors would have refused to perform nude, but obviously any frontal nudity would have gotten the film rated "X" instead of "R". And for many it adds to the eroticism to leave some things to the imagination. And actually, if one is an admirer of young men's behinds (timidly, with embarrassment, raises hand), the wet underwear really doesn't leave that much to the imagination. But I mainly appreciate DeCoteau's films because they're so bad they're funny as hell.

reply