what do you like about it?
I watched this in history and I got the impression that the creators had no idea what they were doing and just used techniques without any understanding of how they're supposed to be used. The acting was great but the portrayal of some of the characters annoyed me. It seemed like we were supposed to hate Woodrow Wilson and NAWSA simply because they opposed Alice Paul, and Alice Paul wasn't even likable. It seemed like the creators wanted Alice to be a headstrong, "gets what she wants" kind of revolutionary but she came across as annoying. There's also some moments that are just bafflingly stupid. Why the hell did Alice Paul need to break the window in the workhouse?? If she wanted to seem calm and portray women better she wouldn't have vandalized a prison because of a perfectly reasonable rule against opening the window. The final thing that bugged me was the ****ing music. Who thought that the modern music they put in fit even slightly? Everything besides the music and editing was acceptable, but the goddamn creative choices were awful. The fast-paced editing works great when it creates suspense or exaggerate humor, but it's used prevalently in the exposition and in calm scenes where it really shouldn't be. The same issue goes with the music. The editing and music styles are very modern and took me out of the movie.
TLDR: the creators didn't understand cinematic techniques, editing and music were too fast paced
try to convince me to like the movie because it got good critical reception and I don't understand why