MovieChat Forums > D.E.B.S. (2004) Discussion > WHY IS THERE A D.E.B.S. 2004 VERSION

WHY IS THERE A D.E.B.S. 2004 VERSION


I NOTICED SHE GOT MORE WELL KNOWN ACTRESSES TO PLAY IN 2004,WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TAMMY LYNN MICHAELS OF 2003 THE REST OF THEM ARE NOT WELL KNOWN BUT THE DIRECTOR DID END UP USING JILL RITCHIE FOR THE 2004?
WUSSUP WITH THE TWO VERSIONS?

reply

The 2004 version is a full length picture based off a short film (which was made in 2003) with the same title.

reply

Thanks

reply

Thanks

reply

um, the D.E.B.S short was shot summer 2002, between june-july. get you're facts straight. It was not made in 2003. It was viewed at sundance 2003.

reply

It's listed as 2003. You can't expect anyone to cross-check facts when they're written in plain English on IMDb.

It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. Henry Laws (1916-1993)

reply

It's listed as 2003. You can't expect anyone to cross-check facts when they're written in plain English on IMDb.

The date that IMDB lists with the title is the release date.

Sometimes the "Trivia" section lists when the film was actually made - but it's a good bet that a film was very likely shot several months to a year earlier, depending on how much postproduction time the film took.

reply

don't be an ass.

reply

[deleted]

I was told that every one of the actresses whom appeared in the short film wanted to appear in the feature movie. But all them, with the exception of Jill Ritchie who played Janet, were dropped or could not work because of scheduling conflicts. I know that Clare Kramer, whom played Lucy in the short, was busy filming Skulls 3 and could not make the time at all.

reply

WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING?

reply

[deleted]

Only IDIOTS type in all caps.

"My GF is Bi-Sexual, Buy Her Something, she gets real Sexual"

reply

"Only IDIOTS type in all caps."

Only idiots care.

reply

haha yay you win!

reply

i like the feature film better. all the short was, was basically two girls making out with eachother the whole time. it was kind of uncomfortable to watch, actually. i love the second version. the acting is great. the sets are pretty. i dont know. the short, i didnt really like.

------
everyone says you're a hero, when really you'e a slut, a GAY slut. -DEBS

reply

i dont know. but the 2004 version is sooo much better.

reply

Yeah I like the 2004 film better. The 2003 short was better for giving me a boner, but in terms of a movie, the 2004 was actually funny, and didnt make the lesbian scenes look like my favorite porn film. It made it possible to watch with other people and not feel uncomfortable.

reply