MovieChat Forums > On the Road (2012) Discussion > Will I like this if I hate Kristen Stewa...

Will I like this if I hate Kristen Stewart?


She's a terrible actress in my opinion. She's ruined everything I've seen her in. Will this movie be the one that changes my mind? Discuss

reply

[deleted]

have you seen the movie

reply

[deleted]

yes, I did read your post but you wrote it as if is a fact. you have not seen the movie yet you act like you do.

reply

[deleted]

Well let see you have being doing this on the board for months. I am calm but while we are it, Why don't you pull your snub a-s-s head out of your a-s-s.

reply

[deleted]

"drunk-IMDbing"

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

ignore the witch.

Can you explain that to me on a fifth grade level, so everybody else will get it?.

reply

vidalady - you're a real dbag. why don't you dis-insert yourself out of the thread. No one is interested in your ranting.

Can you explain that to me on a fifth grade level, so everybody else will get it?.

reply

It is a fact, Kirsten Stewart CAN'T ACT.

reply

True, she just CAN'T act to save her own life.

reply

bland? seriously?

Are you talking about her role in this movie or ar you talking about twilight?

A subtle performance is not bland, a subtle performance is a power to give so much to a role with so little, with a look, a smile, a gesture. The opposite of over the top acting, that so many people nowadays mistake it for real acting.

ahh..from what you have read. Alright than, you must know. Alrightyyy

"If you want to change the world, be that change." Gandhi

reply

[deleted]

From what I've read about On the Road, she succeeds in being bland, yet again.


Wow...your arguments are so convincing...just ummm ...Woooow.

"If you want to change the world, be that change." Gandhi

reply

[deleted]

Sure, sure..
This is an opinion

From what I've read about On the Road...

yes of course...

I do also read and ...watch...all by myself, yeaah. But if I made an argument? Me? No way...never.

"If you want to change the world, be that change." Gandhi

reply

[deleted]

The statement "from what I've read" speaks for itself, that's true, but otherwise than you might think.
I watch movies and stuff by myself before I give an opinion. Basing opinions on comments from people who watched smth, isn't such a good source.
But that's just my opinion.
And you don't need to try to offend me with such things like

You're not very good with reading comprehension and critical thinking, are you?


Offending people just to boost your own aspects is weak.

But what ever makes you happy. Have a nice day!


"If you want to change the world, be that change." Gandhi

reply

[deleted]

How can you acknowledge something that you haven't seen? That's pretty strange.

This dear Vigi is my proof that your "facts" aren't "facts".

If I am so dull with reading comprehension and critical thinking, what does that tell about a person who nontheless takes his time to discuss with me? Again pretty strange.
Also not sharing your opinion is your justification to insult me. Weak!

But you can call me as you please, if that makes you feel superior with your 'high acclaimed' critical thinking, than be it.

I lost my interest to discuss with you, you are this kind of person who keeps on and on...

So have a nice life!


"If you want to change the world, be that change." Gandhi

reply

[deleted]

Everything she's ever been in? Which "everything" are you referring to? Have you seen Speak, The Cake Eaters, The Runaways, Welcome to the Rileys?


reply

good op. was thinking it, too.

Can you explain that to me on a fifth grade level, so everybody else will get it?.

reply

Very dramatic of you.

reply

Nope. It won't change your mind. Don't watch it.

“If you judge people, you have no time to love them.” Mother Teresa

reply

If you think she "ruined" Into The Wild and The Runaways then no, this movie — and probably no performance of hers — will change your mind.

If you simply don't like the popular Twilight tart, then Yes, this will change your mind. She sort of stole the movie the first time I saw it.


— on IMDb "Ignore this User" is your friend.

reply

No, you will hate it, it has Kristen Stewart in it. You said you hated her. She's no different, the skill or "craft" as they call it is not there with this one.

reply

I liked her in Adventureland, The Messengers, and The Runaways. Unfortunately she played the most boring, whiny and ridiculous character in books/films (Bella), and 5 movies of that level of acting, where there is literally nothing of quality in the script to work with, must make any ability regress a notch or two. Personally I think this has had an impact on her trajectory. Add to this her misjudgement in her recent affair/subsequent public apology to RP - blown out of proportion in my estimation - but the taint of it will remain with her.

Twilight made her rich and made her a star. I don't reckon any of the actors probably thought the material was particularly mind-blowing, but a 5-picture deal, instant stardom and a shedload of cash, worth resting on your laurels for!

Taking more adult roles is a step in the right direction.

It's too cerebral! We're trying to make a movie here, not a film!

reply

I'm not a KS fan but I thought she nailed the part of Marylou perfectly - young enough to see sex as an experiment - tougher than she looks at first sight - her inherent decency always seems to be pulling her away from Cassady, while her randiness pushes her back.

No man will marry a bilakoro

reply

I do agree. People just don't like her, for whatever reason, be it the curse of Bella or the recent scandal, but I don't think she's a particularly bad actress. She's going to have to step up and prove herself over the next few years by making some really smart career choices and showing she's capable of more than Twilight blandness. If people had seen her as Marylou in isolation more people would share your opinion. I'm guilty of it - not with KS but I hate watching Tom Cruise movies now. The only one I've liked him in recently is Tropic Thunder and that's because he didn't play himself!

It's too cerebral! We're trying to make a movie here, not a film!

reply

I would like to pitch in and say that I generally don't like her as an actress.

I first saw her in 'Speak' and thought she was good. If you know the plot of that movie, she does the shy, scared, awkward, nervous, broken-down thing very well.
Then I saw her in The Messengers. And it was the same thing. Alright, I watched 'In the Land of Women.' And I felt like she was doing the same character again.
The endless stuttering, the hands trough the hair, the pure awkwardness.

She doesn't become a character, she makes the character herself. If you've seen her in interviews, you'll notice the same mannerisms and behavior. I've seen plenty of her movies, and it frustrates me that she gets good parts, when they could have gone to a more skilled actress.

So screw her personal life and attitude problem, she needs to work on acting happy, joyful and in love. Cause right now, I'm not buying it. That is my personal opinion, so there's no need going on about how directors love her. There is probably a reason why a great deal of the public is complaining about her acting skills.

reply

A lot of famous and successful actors have worked that way, though. Henry Fonda. Jimmy Stewart. Gary Cooper. Harrison Ford....

reply

I don't reckon any of the actors probably thought the material was particularly mind-blowing, but a 5-picture deal, instant stardom and a shedload of cash, worth resting on your laurels for!

Taking more adult roles is a step in the right direction.


Huh? When did she ever rest on her laurels? Kristen has been shooting, on average, 2 movies a year since she was nine. She's mostly chosen more serious, "adult-themed" movies. Twilight, Snow White, and Zathura were the anamolies in the thirty pictures she's done during the course of her career. While she was shooting the Twilight movies she shot:

On the Road
Adventureland
Welcome to the Rileys
The Runaways

Since she's only three years out of her teens, all of her characters have reflected her age. I think Adventureland was the only movie in which her character wasn't a teenager. She played Bella as Bella was written by Stephenie Meyer and Melissa Rosenberg. If people don't like the character, then there's absolutely nothing she can do about that. But, she was true to the character she was playing.

As far as the hypocrisy of her personal life "tainting" her for all of the internet saints out there, I hope she doesn't worry about the people who condemn her because they sin differently than she does. I know I wouldn't concern myself over people that don't know me judging me. That's a complete waste of time.

My hope for her is that she keeps doing as she's been doing, which is picking roles that she's passionate about, committing to them, doing all the research and preparation for her character as humanly possible, and pouring her heart into it. She has devoted fans because of her talent. I know I can't wait to see what she does next.

“If you judge people, you have no time to love them.” Mother Teresa

reply

You've taken what I said out of context. I was saying merely that all the actors in Twilight don't really have to stretch their acting skills in the films. I really like all the other stuff she's done outside of that.

Of course she worries about public perception of her - you can see it in the fact that she publicly apologised to Robert Pattison. If she wasn't worried about it, why would she do that in the first place? The subject of this thread is 'Will I like this if I hate Kristen Stewart'. Quite a few people on this board want to see it because she's naked. Others won't see it because they really don't like her - all because of Twilight/Snow White. Why would they form any opinion if they'd seen Messengers/Runaways/Adventureland in isolation? It's caused bad publicity for her, and the two related movies (Twilight/Snow White). Personally I think affairs in Hollywood are standard and pretty non-surprising, I'm not judging her for doing it, but people will. If anything, OTR is probably a torch in a very stressful year for her, which is why it's a shame more people are focussing on her cup size rather than her acting. People will think Bella=Marylou. It's a shame in fact that this film came out so close to the whole Twilight/Snow White saga, because if it had been a year or so later and she'd done a couple of films in-between, it wouldn't just have been the movie where she finally gets her tits out.

I'm sure she's going to prove the haters wrong, and will have a very successful caeer.

It's too cerebral! We're trying to make a movie here, not a film!

reply

She publicly apologized to Robert Pattinson because a private matter was made public against her will, so her apology was public. The fact of the matter is that some of her fans were hurt because they're overly invested in her personal life. She knows this, so she apologized for the hurt she caused.

Outside of the responsibility that she took for the pain she caused, as I said before, I'm pretty sure she's not overly concerned about what people on the internet and in the general public think about her personal life. At least, that's my hope for her and that's how it appears to be. If she pays attention to the people who obsess over things that aren't their concern, then she'll be paralyzed by fear to make career choices. I hope she continues to be herself and not let the bleating of the naysayers deter her. Of course people will judge her. People always have.

Do you really think the OP wanted to get a real answer to the question that was posed? The fact of the matter is that those who have a preformed opinion of her won't like her no matter what she does. However, bad publicity is still publicity. Her being involved in this film has brought a level of attention to it that it probably wouldn't have gotten otherwise, even with the talented cast. Her and Garrett's involvement brought this film financing and distribution.

I agree with some of what you've said. However, she's getting very good reviews for this movie, despite the "bad" publicity. Yet, if you're correct about her personal life "tainting" her, then it wouldn't matter when this movie was released. The people who are going to think negatively of her will still think negatively of her next year. Jane Fonda is 72 years old and is still being called Hanoi Jane. The people that "hate" her are never going to see reason.

In my opinion, she has proven the haters wrong, repeatedly. This performance is just another example of that. She's already had a very successful career. This is just a bump in the road.


“If you judge people, you have no time to love them.” Mother Teresa

reply

She's young, very beautiful, insanely rich, yes AND talented, I only wish I had her problems. That in itself must make the hardest days easier, and of course she's surrounded by people in Hollywood who will be telling her the same thing.

But actors are actors, and more emotional than most which is why they are good at what they do. I'm sure she carries guilt that she's hurt the people who love the Twilight franchise, particularly as she seems so invested and serious about it (even though a lot of the obsessive fans are bonkers extremists). The public embarrassment alone would be an awful thing to have to deal with. Plus she's very young and probably not hardened enough. If she didn't take it personally she would be incredibly insensitive, and I'm sure she isn't. In most interviews she seems awkward and a bit introverted, and she doesn't give much about herself away which is why her relationship with RP remained hidden for so long. She probably focuses on her career choices because she wants to prove everyone wrong, and she's a good actress who will want to improve her career and work with top people - EVERY actor wants that. She'll get used to negative publicity, but I doubt she's shrugging it off completely.

Now you've piqued my interest - I'm going to have to google Hanoi Jane!

The public have short term memories. The only reason the scandal blew out of proportion is that it happened right before the last Twilight instalment comes out. If it had been some little indie movie they both starred in that hardly anyone watched, they fell in love, then she cheated, probably nobody would have cared less. Stardom comes with a price.

It's too cerebral! We're trying to make a movie here, not a film!

reply

I'm absolutely sure she's aware of the negativity. I'm sure it affects her and probably makes her angry, or whatever. I just hope she's not overly-concerned with it and I don't get the feeling that she is. Since she's been getting this type of hatred since 2007, I'm pretty sure that she would've started putting on an act to deal with the public a long time ago, but she has remained who she is throughout this entire time, flaws and all.

I'm sure she would like to clarify some decisions that she has made in regards to portraying her characters. However, I get the impression that her main concern is not proving "everyone" wrong because everyone doesn't feel that she's a bad actress. There are millions of people who think she's very good at what she does. She's already worked with some of the best in the business. I'm pretty sure that she wants to improve as an actress and grow in her career, too. I agree with you on that. I don't think that will ever change and she has always talked about how she's changed as an actress in different interviews. I can see growth.

Most of the public does have short-term memories and some people have no idea who she is and couldn't care less that she and the "dude from Twilight" have relationship problems. I agree that if they were just two actors in the indie world and weren't associated with such a popular franchise, that nobody would've followed her in the first place to get any pictures of her indiscretions. I don't think the constant stalking by paparazzi is the price anyone should pay for deciding to act for a living and ending up in a popular movie.

Nevertheless, there is a very vocal group of, mostly women, who have made it their mission to hate her. They've devoted their lives to it. That won't change. They follow her every move more obsessively than any fan I've encountered. As soon as she does a movie, they'll bring up old crap and start the hate campaign all over again

If you read about "Hanoi Jane," you'll see that there are some people who, even after an apology and clarification about what actually happened 40 years ago in Vietnam from several different people, will never let go of their ideas about her. They follow her to spit on her and call her a traitor. They will never stop hating her. That's their thing. They can't get past it. That hasn't stopped her from living her life. She has some guilt about the things she actually did wrong and the pain she caused, therefore the apologies. But, she won't let anybody tell her that protesting U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War was wrong and she will never apologize for it. She's still fundamentally Jane Fonda.


“If you judge people, you have no time to love them.” Mother Teresa

reply

Ugh. Goodness are fangirl celebrity worshippers so sad. I mean you really wasted your time typing all of this emotional garbage in defense of some overpaid, vapid, narcissistic play-pretender you'll never meet. And she appears to be a serious obsession of yours, judging by your profile. Really, stop and look at that. I have recovering alcoholic neighbors who are more interesting than this "superstar". Even squirrels are more interesting.
God, some young people out there. Get some freakin personality, please (which Stewart doesn't have to since she's makes loads of money for nothing).

reply

that depends on just how much you dislike her. But I'd guess, considering you made a thread about it, that she will ruin it for you.

reply

I'm guessing you'll probably dislike this movie for completely different reasons other than her although she's not one of the main stars so isn't in it enough to ruin it.

If revenge is a dish best served cold, but revenge is sweet then is revenge ice-cream?

reply

what is "everything"?

she did some amazing performances in a couple movies.
I rly dont get it why ppl complaining.... there are hundreds of actors out there who just have ONE face expression... but if you watch kristen... you feel with her... of course she cried and laughed in movies already. but not in twilight if thats the thing youre talking about.

I just watched 'on the road' and well... yea... its better than in snow white... played her role pretty good... but not as good as kirsten dunst.

and talking about '..playing beside great actors...': sam riley and garret hedlund were boring!

reply

To be honest, I had my doubts about her casting, but I was pleasantly surprised & thought she gave a strong performance. This may just be the movie that changes your opinion about her.

reply