MovieChat Forums > The Passion of the Christ (2004) Discussion > Mexico border wall = decline of American...

Mexico border wall = decline of American Christianity?


And after Trump said he'd favor Christian immigration?

So, maybe the Evangelicals should have voted for Hillary? What's that saying about shooting yourself in the foot?

Make of this what you want.

From https://phys.org/news/2017-02-mexico-border-wall-decline-american.html


Mexico border wall likely to accelerate the decline of American Christianity
February 2, 2017 by Paul V.m. Flesher

In 2015, the Pew Research Center released the largest study of American religious identity ever done in the United States of America, called "America's Changing Religious Landscape." The big discovery was that the number of American Christians had declined by 7.8 percent since the previous survey in 2007, while the number of Americans religiously unaffiliated had increased by 6.7 percent to 22.8 percent of the national population.

The only bright spot for Christianity was that, even though evangelical Christianity had declined as a percentage of the national population (down 0.9 percent), it had grown in real numbers by 2.4 million adherents.

There was a second important trend buried in the numbers and completely missed at the time. Hispanic immigration has propped up this declining American Christianity. The loss of Christian adherents would have been worse if it had not been for Hispanic immigration.

Evangelical Christianity owed its increase largely to Hispanic converts from Catholicism, and both mainstream Christianity and Catholicism would have sustained bigger losses if it had not been for increases in Hispanic membership. These trends indicate that, if the USA builds an effective border wall, immigration will further decline and, along with it, the number of Americans identifying as Christian.

The first trend is that the three largest types of Christianity—evangelical and mainstream Protestantism, and Catholicism—had big losses between the 2007 and the 2014 surveys. Evangelicals lost 8.4 percent, mainstream Protestants lost 10.4 percent, and Catholics lost 12.9 percent of their members.

Luckily, this was countered by newcomers joining these faiths. There were 9.8 percent new evangelicals, 6.1 percent new mainstream Protestants, but just 2 percent new Catholics. So, the final, overall numbers came out to a 1.5 percent increase for evangelicals, but a loss of 4.3 percent and 10.9 percent for mainstream Protestants and Catholics, respectively. The Pew report emphasized that many of these leavers left formal religious membership altogether. However, a significant number simply joined other types of Christianity.

The second trend is that none of the three types of Christianity can sustain its numbers by generational replacement. That is, the children of these adherents are fewer than the number of adults. This is largely because of declining family size. For example, 30 percent of evangelicals were born in the generation between 1928 and 1946, while just 21 percent were born in the millennial generation between 1981 and 1996. As the older generation passes away and the younger generation ages, the total number of adherents will drop. The imbalance is similar for the other two forms of Christianity. Without an influx of new blood, all three types of Christianity will decrease in size.

The third trend is that nearly 80 percent of the replacements for the losses in these types of Christianity come from Hispanics. All three have had a 5 percent increase in ethnic diversity in the seven years between 2007 and 2014. That increase is 80 percent Hispanic for all three forms of Christianity. Indeed, for Evangelicalism, the increase in the percentage of Hispanics accounts for its increase in real numbers of members. If Hispanic immigrants or their children had not joined these three types of Christianity, all three would have shown significant losses. Catholics would have dropped 12.5 percent of its members in those seven years (instead of 10.9 percent). Mainstream Protestants would have lost 9.2 percent (instead of just 4.3 percent), and evangelical Protestants would have lost 6.4 percent (instead of gaining 1.5 percent).

The fourth trend is that this Hispanic increase came in different ways. Most Hispanic immigrants arrive as Catholics. Catholicism's 5 percent increase is part of the decades-long influx of Hispanic members that has kept the numbers of American Catholics fairly steady. It also has helped Catholicism to become the most ethnically diverse form of Christianity: 41 percent of Catholics are nonwhite, and most nonwhites are Hispanic.

For the two forms of Protestantism, however, Hispanic membership has come from conversion. These are Hispanics who have been in America for a long(er) time, and they convert to this still-dominant form of American religion as part of the assimilation process. For the mainstream Protestant denominations, the number of converts was not enough to prevent a decline in membership but, for evangelical Protestantism, it was.

What will be the impact of an effective wall between the USA and Mexico? These trends from the past eight years suggest that the number of Christians in the USA will decline faster than it has been. This will first be evident in Catholicism, but it will soon show up in the membership of the mainstream Protestant denominations and, then, among evangelical Protestant Christians.

(my emphasis)


Religion - the original can of Ever-So-Much-More-So.

reply

My state has seen dozens of church closings the past decade, due to lack of attendance, donations, clergy, etc. I can only imagine that shutting out a group of potential new adherents to the three major Christian faiths will only contribute to that trend. In addition to the smaller family size, more people ditching religion altogether, etc.


We'll see if this gets pointed out to the new administration and how they address it.

reply

But they're...ew....brown! And speak some goofy language....and Republicans tell me I should hate them because they come here and vote for the wrong party, up to 3 million times.

Religion aside, Trump is just a cult of popularity. People reverted back to high school maturity and voted in the popular kid no matter how disgusting his views and outbursts.
2 weeks in and the protests worldwide continue.




Panzer vor!

reply

The ironic thing about border security is that it actually increases the number of illegal immigrants.

Used to be there was a "conveyor belt" of illegals between the US and Mexico. The illegals would come to the US to do seasonal work, then head home to their families with the cash. But then Reagan increased border security. So now the illegals say "oh, I better not go home, I might not be able to get back here again." So they stay in the US. And then, of course, they want their families with them, so they come over too.

The idea of the wall keeping people out is nonsense. Huge numbers of illegals enter the country perfectly legally, and just choose to stay when their visas run out. So NO amount of security will keep them out. But it WILL keep them in.

Stupidity on top of stupidity. Typical Trump. Typical republicanism.


--
If I could stop a rapist from raping a child I would. That's the difference between me and god.

reply

Not to mention the physical impossibility because an actual border wall would cut through both public and private property unless he's willing to cede land to Mexico or try to annex Mexican land.
It's just as ridiculous as this muslim ban. In the long run it's not going to do anything but piss a lot of people off by destroying their lives.
Given how many mass shootings in the US are committed by white, native born americans I wonder how long before he bans white people for America's security.




Panzer vor!

reply

Even if you disregard the political and moral aspects of it, the wall is just a really dumb idea. In order for the wall to be effective, you have to have sentries along its entirety, or people could simply dig underneath it where it wasn't guarded. But if there are guards along the entirety of the border, then a fence suffices. So the wall is a complete waste of money: it is either ineffective or redundant.

reply

It's just as ridiculous as this muslim ban


Typical liberal hypocrisy: love Muslims and hate Christians.

Given how many mass shootings in the US are committed by white, native born americans I wonder how long before he bans white people for America's security.


Typical liberal anti-white racism. And hypocrisy.

If you really cared about Americans not being murdered, then you would condemn the murders of ~60 million Americans, and the also of ~2+ billion people worldwide, that have been legally murdered under the label of 'abortion' and that continue to be murdered on a daily basis.

Likewise, if you really cared about Americans not being murdered, then you would advocate for trump to ban all liberals/darwinists/atheists/feminists/SJWs/other miscellaneous types of baby murderers/enablers.

But you and others like you will never do anything like that, because contrary to what you say, you love when Americans are murdered. If that is not true, then you can prove me wrong by condemning and renouncing the 'abortion' holocaust. If you fail to do so, you will have proven everything I said in this post to be 100% correct.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

Typical liberal hypocrisy: love Muslims and hate Christians.

Typical nazi rhetoric. Swap "Muslims" with "Jews" and hey presto: the arguments are indistinguishable from 80 years ago.


If you really cared about Americans not being murdered, then you would condemn the murders of ~60 million Americans, and the also of ~2+ billion people worldwide, that have been legally murdered under the label of 'abortion' and that continue to be murdered on a daily basis.

You love foetuses, but deny Muslims the right to live. Interesting. Tell me more about your childhood.


Likewise, if you really cared about Americans not being murdered, then you would advocate for trump to ban all liberals/darwinists/atheists/feminists/SJWs/other miscellaneous types of baby murderers/enablers.

Because that doesn't sound paranoid at all.


But you and others like you will never do anything like that, because contrary to what you say, you love when Americans are murdered. If that is not true, then you can prove me wrong by condemning and renouncing the 'abortion' holocaust. If you fail to do so, you will have proven everything I said in this post to be 100% correct.

And that doesn't sound stark, raving mad at all. 

reply

Typical nazi rhetoric. Swap "Muslims" with "Jews" and hey presto: the arguments are indistinguishable from 80 years ago.


That is a non-sequitur that has nothing whatsoever to do with what anything that my post said.

But interesting that you bring up the Nazis, since liberals like yourself, rumble, graham, mamu, hillary clinton, barack obama, and all the other evildoers that this thread attempts to glorify have been carrying on the Nazis' work, and liberals have murdered vastly more people than the Nazis ever did! To condemn the Nazis yet not condemn yourselves simultaneously is hypocrisy of the highest magnitude. Of course, I am not defending the Nazis...my point is simply that their liberal descendants are even more evil and have murdered way more people.

You love foetuses


There is no such thing as "foetueses," nor any other similar euphemism that baby murderers (a.k.a. today's equivalent of Nazis) try to re-label babies with in a shady attempt to pretend that babies are not human and that murdering them is 'okay.' In fact, that is another example of a Nazi principle in action by today's liberals/darwinists/atheists/feminists/SJWs etc...in the exact same manner as hitler tried to dehumanize the Jews to justify murdering them on a mass scale, so too do they try to dehumanize babies to justify murdering them on a mass scale.

but deny Muslims the right to live.


That too is a non-sequitur that has nothing whatsoever to do with anything that my post said. It is also another example of hypocrisy-based projection: your kind denies babies the right to live.

Because that doesn't sound paranoid at all.


How would ending a holocaust/genocide be "paranoid?" Again, non-sequitur that makes no sense.

Besides, I don't see you offering any suggestions about how to end the holocaust.

And that doesn't sound stark, raving mad at all


Of course it doesn't. On the contrary, your kind is stark raving mad, which is why you commit and support the mass murdering of babies and pretend like your unconscionable evil is fine and dandy. Nothing is more stark raving mad than that!

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

try to re-label babies with in a shady attempt to pretend that babies are not human and that murdering them is 'okay.



The Bible apparently does just that though. Book of Numbers Chapter 5 has God personally giving a law for abortion (forced miscarriage) directly to Moses. The Bible doesn't consider a life to be a life until it takes a breath, and doesn't even count infants as people until they are at least a month old. And in many places, infants are murdered and the unborn ripped from wombs at God's command. I'm sure I don't need to post the verses, we've all seen them and their context.

So if God is ok with it, so shouldn't you be as well?

reply

mamu, as always, your evil acts of dissembly are completely false.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

Not if they are supported by the Bible itself, they aren't.


Abortion (forced miscarriage) given as a LAW from God himself directly to Moses...


Numbers 5: The Test for an Unfaithful Wife

11Then the Lord said to Moses, 12“Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If a man’s wife goes astray and is unfaithful to him 13so that another man has sexual relations with her, and this is hidden from her husband and her impurity is undetected (since there is no witness against her and she has not been caught in the act), 14and if feelings of jealousy come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure—or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure— 15then he is to take his wife to the priest. He must also take an offering of a tenth of an ephahc of barley flour on her behalf. He must not pour olive oil on it or put incense on it, because it is a grain offering for jealousy, a reminder-offering to draw attention to wrongdoing.

16“ ‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. 17Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. 18After the priest has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. 19Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse not harm you. 20But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a cursed among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”

“ ‘Then the woman is to say, “Amen. So be it.”

23“ ‘The priest is to write these curses on a scroll and then wash them off into the bitter water. 24He shall make the woman drink the bitter water that brings a curse, and this water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering will enter her. 25The priest is to take from her hands the grain offering for jealousy, wave it before the Lord and bring it to the altar. 26The priest is then to take a handful of the grain offering as a memoriale offering and burn it on the altar; after that, he is to have the woman drink the water. 27If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse. 28If, however, the woman has not made herself impure, but is clean, she will be cleared of guilt and will be able to have children.

29“ ‘This, then, is the law of jealousy when a woman goes astray and makes herself impure while married to her husband, 30or when feelings of jealousy come over a man because he suspects his wife. The priest is to have her stand before the Lord and is to apply this entire law to her. 31The husband will be innocent of any wrongdoing, but the woman will bear the consequences of her sin.’ ”



No other way to interpret, spin, excuse, or apologize for it. That is forcing a woman suspected of being unfaithful to drink a potion that would cause a miscarriage.


God has no issue with causing miscarriages in Hosea...

“Give them, O LORD–what will You give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts.” (Hosea 9:14)



Or the murder of women who are pregnant with child...

The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open. (Hosea 13:16)


At that time Menahem, starting out from Tirzah, attacked Tiphsah and everyone in the city and its vicinity, because they refused to open their gates. He sacked Tiphsah and ripped open all the pregnant women. (2 Kings 15:16)


Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey. (1 Samuel 15:3)


Happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us. He who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks. (Psalms 137:8-9)





The Bible contains many verses that show that breath = life.

God breathes the breath of life into Adam in Genesis,

Psalm 33 states that "By the word of the LORD the heavens were made, And by the breath of His mouth all their host.",

In a vision, God makes an army of the dead in Ezekiel by breathing life into them "Thus saith the Lord God; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live".

Also in Ezekiel... "Thus says God, the Lord, who created the heavens and stretched them out, who spread out the earth and what comes from it, who gives breath to the people on it and spirit to those who walk in it".


Breath is life. The Bible doesn't consider that a fetus is alive until birth when God breathes life into it.


The fine for causing an abortion is a fine of property damage, to be paid to the woman's husband. Why property damage and not murder? If the woman is injured, or dies in the process, then the person who hit her will be injured or killed in equal measure, an eye for an eye, according to the ancient law. No such punishment for killing the fetus.


Babies aren't even considered people worthy of being counted until a month in age. God ordered Moses to conduct a census, counting only infant males "a month old or more" in the Book of Numbers.



So there are Biblical verses that support my claims. Again.



Why do you deny the existence of all these verses and laws from God himself??



reply

Abortion (forced miscarriage) given as a LAW from God himself directly to Moses...


Bull crap.

when he makes your womb miscarry


Valid versions of the Bible do not say "miscarry". For example, King James Version says "when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell."

You are so full of crap mamu. In another thread, you said "I post directly from the Bible." But you never really do that. You know you are lying when you say that. What you do is search the web for demonic atheist-written, anti-Bible propaganda sites, then you parrot their demonic arguments here on this board.

Every time, you/they either take the Bible out of context, or claim it says something that it does not say. Case in point: the bull crap misquotation that I've just debunked in this post. The same principles apply equally well to every single post you ever make about the Bible. In short, anything you say about the Bible is bull.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

and thy belly to swell.



A swelling belly that causes the woman to lose the pregnancy is still a forced miscarriage (abortion). No way to spin that.


King Kames isn't the original translation regardless, and was specifically edited and translation changes were made in many places to meet a specific agenda. That is historical and easily looked up. Or are you suggesting that the KJ version predates the Mishnah and Talmud?


And all the other verses I posted regarding God ordering the murder of unborn and breath equaling life? Any response to those?


reply

Typical liberal hypocrisy: love Muslims and hate Christians.


I've no issue with Christians. In fact I've gotten along with them even on these boards.
I do hav a problem with lying, bastard evangicals that have the morals of a house fly and the brain power of an amoeba like you, Nav

Typical liberal anti-white racism. And hypocrisy.


It was a joke, moron.

If you really cared about Americans not being murdered, then you would condemn the murders of ~60 million Americans, and the also of ~2+ billion people worldwide, that have been legally murdered under the label of 'abortion' and that continue to be murdered on a daily basis.


And yet still, after ten years, you can't be bothered to post a link or any factual information on your numbers.

Likewise, if you really cared about Americans not being murdered, then you would advocate for trump to ban all liberals/darwinists/atheists/feminists/SJWs/other miscellaneous types of baby murderers/enablers.


Yeah, because it's certainly been "darwinists" and atheists murdering people....no, it hasn't.
Youtube Tony, rabid evangical, stalked and shot a woman he was infatuated with before shooting himself

Scott Roeder, rabid evangical drummed up by fox media and went to the church of George Tiller to shoot him dead in cold blood

Dylan Roof, Racist Christian, entered a black church to shoot multiple people for being black

Adam Lanza, Christian with a mental issue, went to Sandy Hook Elementary and killed multiple children after killing his mother

Seung-Hui Cho, Christian, attended Virginia tech and shot multiple students to death

Elliot Rodger, Christian, went on a killing spree because women didn't love him

Wade Page, Christian and nazi, killed six people in a sikh temple because he thought they were muslim

Alexandre Bissonnette, christian, Donald Trump supporter, shot and killed multiple muslims in a mosque

Yes, those atheists truly are the dangerous ones. Fecker

But you and others like you will never do anything like that, because contrary to what you say, you love when Americans are murdered. If that is not true, then you can prove me wrong by condemning and renouncing the 'abortion' holocaust. If you fail to do so, you will have proven everything I said in this post to be 100% correct.


I can't condemn made up bullcrap navs. You've placed me in an impossible to answer spot because you have to, desperately have to be right




Panzer vor!

reply

I've no issue with Christians


Bull crap. You hate Christians and everything they stand for. The only "Christians" who you have no issue with are fake/non Christians who are really darwinists with zero morals, exactly like yourself. They may call themselves "Christian," but on them, that is a meaningless label. You love them because like the saying goes, "birds of a feather flock together."


It was a joke, moron.


A joke that just happens to propagate the same anti-white racism that most liberals have started to promote within the last 5 years? That's quite a coincidence. More likely, it was your way to support the propagation of that same racism just like your peers do.

Yeah, because it's certainly been "darwinists" and atheists murdering people.


Yes, it certainly has. Who do you think murdered the ~65 million Americans and ~2 billion people worldwide via 'abortion?' It wasn't Bible-believing a.k.a. real Christians. No, it was darwinists/atheists/liberals/feminists/SJWs etc., exactly like you and the other posters in this thread (many of whom have openly admitted that they support that holocaust, including mamu and graham...and your failure to condemn it seems to imply that you support it too) except for myself. The blood of those millions/billions of murder victims are on your kind's hands. Your kind is responsible for committing the biggest atrocity/holocaust/crime against humanity/genocide in the history of humanity! Nothing else even comes close.

I can't condemn made up bullcrap navs.


But it's not made up bullcraps. It's historical facts.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

Bull crap. You hate Christians and everything they stand for. The only "Christians" who you have no issue with are fake/non Christians who are really darwinists with zero morals, exactly like yourself. They may call themselves "Christian," but on them, that is a meaningless label. You love them because like the saying goes, "birds of a feather flock together."


Insanity is a bad thing Navvy.

A joke that just happens to propagate the same anti-white racism that most liberals have started to promote within the last 5 years? That's quite a coincidence. More likely, it was your way to support the propagation of that same racism just like your peers do.


Lol, who says I'm a liberal? I own guns after all

Yes, it certainly has. Who do you think murdered the ~65 million Americans and ~2 billion people worldwide via 'abortion?' It wasn't Bible-believing a.k.a. real Christians.


From what I've read on that no one asks what religion the patients are, but a few doctors have stated and given proof that people out there protesting them and shouting down others have brought their family members in for help.

No, it was darwinists/atheists/liberals/feminists/SJWs etc., exactly like you and the other posters in this thread


I can't have an abortion, Navs.

(many of whom have openly admitted that they support that holocaust, including mamu and graham...and your failure to condemn it seems to imply that you support it too)


Aww,you learned a new word, how cute. Wasn't it christians that created that word? Oh yes, sometime in the 40's, wasn't it?

The blood of those millions/billions of murder victims are on your kind's hands. Your kind is responsible for committing the biggest atrocity/holocaust/crime against humanity/genocide in the history of humanity! Nothing else even comes close.


God can blame me all he wants right after he takes responsibility for all the miscarriages that far outnumber abortions

But it's not made up bullcraps. It's historical facts.


No, it's made up bullcrap as I have had zero impact on whether people can or can't have abortions despite my stance on them because I believe that as a man, I do not have the right to choose what women do when it affects them.




Panzer vor!

reply

Elliot Rodger, Christian


No he wasn't. He committed Onanism and he also wanted to fornicate. Those are not Christian traits.

I haven't heard of most of the people on your list, but the fact that you lie about that guy being a Christian is enough to prove your whole list is bull.

And even if your whole list was true, that would still be a drop in the bucket compared to the ~2 billion+ that your kind has murdered and continues to murder in the 'abortion' holocaust.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

No he wasn't. He committed Onanism and he also wanted to fornicate. Those are not Christian traits.


Neither are lying, threatening, murdering, or screwing over the poor, yet you and other christians have no issue with it.

I haven't heard of most of the people on your list, but the fact that you lie about that guy being a Christian is enough to prove your whole list is bull.

ahahahahahahahaha, and you have the balls to call others idiots. These were pretty big events, some as recently as a week ago.

And even if your whole list was true, that would still be a drop in the bucket compared to the ~2 billion+ that your kind has murdered and continues to murder in the 'abortion' holocaust.


and yet still no link or facts to back up your claims...funny that




Panzer vor!

reply

Just a note. I will miss the imdb boards, and especially this one, and two or three others that I frequent. What I will not miss is grubby little imbeciles like Navaros and marty. They have repeatedly disgraced themselves on here, and by example have presented their Christianity in the very worst possible light. Lying in order to protect and promote their savage fundamentalism seems to be their only motivation, and their only source of corrupt joy. The one comforting thing about the upcoming extinction of this forum is that these maggots will no longer be able to spew their vile slime.

reply