MovieChat Forums > Girl with a Pearl Earring (2004) Discussion > The chair in that earlier painting

The chair in that earlier painting


I don't understand the scene where Griet is closely examining Vermeer's painting and notices a chair in it, then goes to move it, and then finds another painting where there is no chair there. Can someone explain to me please?

reply

The painting Griet is examining is one that Vermeer is working on. Griet is then seen moving a chair which is part of a scene set-up Vermeer has created to aid him visually as he paints. Griet then later re-examines the same painting - after Vermeer has asked her why she moved the chair - and find's he has painted the chair out. If you look at the bottom of that painting he is working on, you can still see some of the chair that he hasn't painted over.

reply

Yes, Griet has shown him, although unintentionally, that the scene is better without the chair.

reply

It is a question of composition. The chair in the foreground closes off the space in front of the figure standing at the window. For Griet, it appears to close her in and she is aware of the spacial relationship and takes the initiative to move the prop that Vermeer had set for the painting. When she looks at the painting after her "suggestion" to the artist, she sees he has painted out the chair. It is an act far above the station of a mere cleaning maid, and that of an equal with the great Vermeer. His acknowledgement of her change in his painting is a major recognition of the role and influence that Griet has in the artistic process of Vermeer. She is critical of his work in an unspoken way, and he listened to her, something that was not the role of a woman, nor especially, for a housemaid at that time and setting. When the camera moves down the canvas, the legs of the chair that have not been painted out are clearly visible evidencing the changed mind of the artist to his earlier composition.

-- Ew lover, you gonna make me clutch my pearls --

reply

Besides their many children, the reason that the Vermeer family was always poor was that as his mother-in-law said, he worked a long time on each painting. Fewer than thirty survive. X-rays of his paintings show that he was constantly tinkering with them; he'd move people and furniture around, paint a map on the wall and then remove it, and so on.

reply