MovieChat Forums > Non ti muovere (2004) Discussion > How naked does Penelope cruz get in this...

How naked does Penelope cruz get in this?


Sorry to be the typical male asking this rediculous question, but I'm just curious.

reply

Nothing. You see a nipple for about a quarter of a second.

Pervert. ;)

reply

How can it contain so many sex scenes (as I've read) and yet have no nudity?

reply

You are in an idiot.

Do you get completely naked and wiggle your sausage in front of every girl you have sex with?

A lot of the sex scenes take place in a moment of passion- when you don't have time to completely disrobe. That's the type of sex I like.

reply

Wiggle your sausage, poetic!

reply

magnificent , beuty at its best

reply

absolutely agree

reply

Penolope's breasts are totally beautiful. Weird, too, as the rest of her is so damn thin.


reply

Um... tell me... how does one get "in an idiot"?

Is that what happens when the doctor rapes Cruz? (joking! joking!)

Relax a bit, the guy was just asking and doing it in a funny way.

You may not understand but men are capable of wanting to see boobs and enjoying a movie.

You know, a good man understands that women have multiple personalities. They can be an intelligent, professional woman in one moment, a sweet, little daddy's girl in the next, and then maybe they want to be a moaning "slut" later. We understand that you aren't always the same thing.

Well, understand that men have multiple personalities also. One minute we are a teenaged boy who wants to stare at boobs, the next we are a sensitive man who wants to watch a movie (and maybe tear up a bit).

Just because we want to stare at boobs, doesn't mean that's *all* we want to do (though, that would be nice). ;-)

"...nothing is left of me, each time I see her..." - Catullus

reply

You know, a good man understands that women have multiple personalities. They can be an intelligent, professional woman in one moment, a sweet, little daddy's girl in the next, and then maybe they want to be a moaning "slut" later. We understand that you aren't always the same thing.

Wow.. That is one of the most sexist things I've ever read on IMDB..

Dear Warden.. You were right. Salvation lies within.

reply

Well, understand that men have multiple personalities also. One minute we are a teenaged boy who wants to stare at boobs, the next we are a sensitive man who wants to watch a movie (and maybe tear up a bit).


I guess you missed that part. Wow. Way to go, responding to a post from a year and a half ago. Don't you have something inane to add over on the Johnny Depp board?


"...nothing is left of me, each time I see her..." - Catullus

reply

I did actually catch that part, still thought your post was sexist. Sorry.

Way to go, responding to a post from a year and a half ago.

???? Who cares if your post was from 1,5 years ago? Do you mean to say that I can only reply to threads that are recent? By the way, if my previous post was so irrelevant why did you reply? Seeing as your first contribution was "ages" ago..

Don't you have something inane to add over on the Johnny Depp board?

Oh, dear could you be anymore childish? Looking at my posting history and rubbing that in... And no, buddy. I rather be here and prove you wrong. Goodday.

Dear Warden.. You were right. Salvation lies within.

reply

I did actually catch that part, still thought your post was sexist. Sorry.

Fair enough. I still think it isn't sexist. Sorry.

Who cares if your post was from 1,5 years ago? Do you mean to say that I can only reply to threads that are recent?

It is considered poor netiquette to respond to very old posts. Do a Google search for yourself and find out.

By the way, if my previous post was so irrelevant why did you reply? Seeing as your first contribution was "ages" ago..

Just because you are being rude doesn't mean I have to ignore you. Although now, that is beginning to feel like it might have been the wisest course of action.

Oh, dear could you be anymore childish? Looking at my posting history and rubbing that in... And no, buddy. I rather be here and prove you wrong. Goodday.


First of all, please don't refer to me as "buddy". I have a handle, please use it. There is no reason to begin name-calling, no matter how innocuous the term may be. Secondly, I think it's more than a little hypocritical to challenge me for "rubbing in" your posting history, while you are engaged in "rubbing in" my posting history (from a year-and-a-half ago, no less).

I have an excellent idea... how about we just agree to disagree and part friends? By all means, have the last word. However, as far as I'm concerned this is only going to get more ugly, and I have no desire to participate in that. Cheers.


"...nothing is left of me, each time I see her..." - Catullus

reply

It is considered poor netiquette to respond to very old posts. Do a Google search for yourself and find out.
Not in my book, it ain't, Google or no Google. And especially not in these forums where people will often see films years after they have come out.

reply

of course its sexist he's talking about women. doh

reply

Yes!

reply

[deleted]

but does anybody else get strangely aroused by how ugly she is in this? :)
with all that tooth gap etc

reply

she gets more attractive as the film leads on though ive noticed, im assuming thats in some way linked with her unwinding and finding herself?

"they should give nicole kidman an oscar for being able to show any emotion after THAT much botox".

reply

Why don't you rent some porno with all the f...g nakedness you can imagine, in close up??????

This message has not yet been deleted by an administrator

reply

Porn doesn't have good stories, can't afford millions of dollars in production, while these movies can easily add porn, that is if the actors weren't so lazy

reply