MovieChat Forums > Little Erin Merryweather (2007) Discussion > This is a Classic! Underrated and Absolu...

This is a Classic! Underrated and Absolutely Necessary.


Little Erin Merryweather? No, I don't want to meet her, but I'm so glad that, cinematically speaking, certain male characters with dirty hands and innocent hearts did. Wow! This film leaps into your lap like a rabid cat or a nightmare
in your midst and watching it you become pulled in to its horrific narrative. I am very much in league with critics who find that most genres are dead, bankrupt, cliche, and not worth your time. And then you find a story as fresh as the blood it pours-- and that blood is strategic; this film is really a homage to arty horror and suspense films of the past several decades, and its violence is never gratuitous, but also harrowing. I suggest people watch this film with the lights out, the pulse racing, and the shriek in the back of your throat getting its scream resounding. Vigdis Anholt is a scary, amazing, and novel antagonist: an addition to the horror genre that should disabuse anyone of the notion that the horror genre is a bygone. Moreover, David Morwick, and here I'll not elaborate on his fine directing and writing, plays a protagonist for whom your sympathies will be played with and all through the film will be intact. You want Peter Bloom to LIVE? Does he? I'm not telling buy or rent this underrated film and realize, with this film as a prime example, that the horror genre is alive and fiendishly well. It doesn't need gallons of blood, innumerable tits and ass, and smoke and mirrors to be a central kind of cinema in the 21st Century. Little Erin Merryweather is a knife in the back of horror film naysayers!

reply

[deleted]

I didn't love it as much as you,but love your review, you have a way with words hon!I do admire David Morwick for being good at so many different things at once,the way these indies work I know these guys are forced to juggle so many different roles writer,actor etc. (that must have been a headache and a half),although he should stay in front of the camera hes too cute to stay behind it,plus he's a great actor.I just wish they did a better job with the pacing of the film,it could have been so much scarier if it was not sooo slow at times. oh and thanks for the info on the artist on my other post,hey do you know anything about about the movie the strangers?I'm dying to see it and my husband refuses to go because hes not a horror fan but I think it looks like its gonna be amazing.

reply

[deleted]

OMG thank you! my husband dosen't think shes pretty,i think hes crazy

reply

[deleted]

EXACTLY! thank god she dosen't look too much like her dad lol

reply

[deleted]

me too,well signing off kiddies!

reply

how old is liv tyler anyway,she still looks the same shes aged beautifully!

reply

Great review on this one Sean!

reply

you never got back to me on how old Liv is? that's ok I forgive you hon lol

reply

[deleted]

I really didn't like it as well.

reply

Great review.

reply

ˆ love this review as well,This dude can write!

reply

lol I know he needs to be their publicist lol!There is a big fanclub on facebook for this movie I just joined.

reply

I watched my own negative reviews as well as half a dozen others get removed on spurious grounds time and again before I researched the actual IMDb policies. Your fave film-maker does not respond well to criticism, but does seem very fond of censoring the opinions of others. I didn't think it very fair that among reams of reviews that appeared to be written by friends of David that any person who offered a less flattering review had their opinions removed by bogus use of the IMDb posting policies.

If you guys want to challenge my actual review and the opinions and points expressed within it instead of your ad-hominem attacks of "psycho, basement-dweller et al" I have no problem elucidating further on why I think the film is weak to the point of absurdity.

reply

Firstly, fantastic review! You have a beautiful way with words.

I do agree to a certain degree. The film is, at the least, stunning. The use of shadows, deep riches and the classic fairytale help take a simple premise and being more elegance to it.

There were certain points where I felt it wasn't quite as good as it could have been. It is a slow start to drag you in and it is not a movie that you get into instantly but past those small niggles it really carries through.

The main character of Peter Bloom is well done by David Morwick (Director, etc...) and you do actually quite like him. He has this charm that you cannot ignore and he brings it through the performance. I didn't warm to him straightaway but after a considerable while I did begin to warm to him.

However the icing on the cake for me was Vigdis Anholt. Much like with some of my favourite actors it is the fact she does not have to say anything, just the expressions she holds make her and the character she is, come to life. There's an innocent look to her eyes so when she taps into that darkness, it's all the more sinister for it.

Barely an inch of blood but genuinely scary with some wonderful music and a storyline that is original in today's market, make it something to seek out. Personally what I loved about Little Erin Merryweather was the use of the shadows, the darkness; taking the usual and making it eerie, combined with that score it's like the chill of the air pressing against your back and leaving you covered in goosebumps.

Underappreciated at the very least and overlooked I agree this is a movie that deserves to be seen and heard before judged. Great little horror gem and something to be admired for what it does with a limited budget.

reply