MovieChat Forums > Gaza Strip (2002) Discussion > User comments don't offer any resolve.

User comments don't offer any resolve.


This weekend there is an Amnesty Film Festival in my city, and after having seen the list of films being offered. My girlfriend and I felt inclined to see Gaza Strip, since it was presented as a neutral depiction of Palestinian life. Yet since I had work obligations (bye bye weekend), we firmly decided to rent this movie or see it in the near future.

The movie description looked really attractive to us, since it claimed that the movie was more of an antropologic depiction of a Palestinian community. Yet after reading all the user comments I'm wondering if it's not yet another pro this or that documentary? Somehow I have the feeling that even if a documentary didn't include a stance on the conflict, thus being neutral, people would find some speculative bias to complain about/promote there opinion.

Your thoughts would be gladly appreciated; meaning, convince me to see or not see this film without using any reference to the conflict.

reply

The review that is now up on the page is quite accurate:

must see movie. warning: this movie is not an attempt to give you the 'news'. James is simply trying to go behind the closed door and reveal the fact that (drumroll) Palestinians are human beings! something that if you've read some of the other reviews you might have missed. how can you argue and whine and moan about whether or not he should have included interviews with Jews or gone to terrorist training camps? its like saying he should have included a shot of a pink elephant flying on a little purple cloud because, by god, i like purple clouds, its absolutely irrelevant. the movie, as other sane people have pointed out,is not about the history of the conflict or who is right or wrong, it simply shows people in their most honest and straightforward forms. you are free to watch and make your own decision about what you believe, an allowance that many docs avoid by inserting preachy commentary and questionable statistics etc...also, i find it interesting how vehemently these haters deny the facts as they are presented. people being brought into a hospital suffering from horrible wounds, paralysing gasses etc...perhaps these were all special effects? i don't know, but i do know James and i have seen most of the 70 some hours of footage that he shot and i can say that the film that he has made is tragic, beautiful and real, more than many other films can claim. and no matter where you stand on the issue there is no denying that the people, the human beings, living in this part of the world are suffering. of course that doesn't mean that others aren't as well, it is simply a mirror held up to our faces that we should look into deeply so that we can all make better choices in the future. anyway, thats my 2 cents. thanks James, keep up the good work!


Obviously the director --and viewer--, unless without hearts, will sympathize with the Palestinians they witness suffering in this film, but no part of this film targets the Israelis (though there is plenty of anger from the Palestinians in the film).

I am sure some would consider the introductory roll of background information slanted, but it represents the facts in favour of his subject, so it is not without reason.

reply

I watched the film twice, the second time with the commentary. The second viewing helped me to appreciate the filmmaker's approach. Also he adds a lot of background information that helps explain the story.

* God is an imaginary friend for adults. *

reply

I've only seen this film once, and it appeared bias to me because the filmmaker never gives any explanation as to why Israel is attacking the people. The attracts on the Palestinians look completely unprovoked.
But, I am interested to see the film with the commentary.
The film is worth seeing even if only to see the film through the eyes of the young Palestinians who don't know why they are being shot at.

reply