At first I thought that he was just being smart enough to know that getting back together wouldn't work. That they'd just end up re-fighting all the same fights, that he wasn't the best match for her temperament / lifestyle anymore, given how dedicated he was to the company. That he made a hard, smart choice.
Then I thought back, she had been kind of standoffish. Well, she genuinely looked glad to see him at the beginning, but got formal in the middle and left early, no doubt just not wanting to get carried away so suddenly, give herself some space. But, perhaps he thought that /she/ had moved on, or, while still having feelings, had decided it wasn't going to work and was just being formally nice. /We/ see how excited she is after meeting him, but that surprises us after her formality. But he hasn't seen that. He maybe thinks going to see her and talk with her would just being going through some motions, which would be leaden and even painful if there's no hope in them of anything more. So he decides not to go through with it, just awkwardness or pain for both of them. And it just takes him a while to come to consciously let it go. Or perhaps he added this thought to the first one.
But probably only the first interpretation was the filmmaker's intention, because we see him being steely, or struggling between steeliness and humanness all through the movie. He'd been on a humanity kick most recently, hiring back his brother-in-law, but it just lets us know that this final battle is a real battle. I think the film is more meaningful under that interpretation; having a happy ending go sour because of an accidental personal misreading just doesn't make sense.
reply
share