Book vs Movie


Hi,

I'm an avid reader, I go through 1-3 book a week, and can get through just about anything.

I read Fannie Flag's Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe, on which the movie-which I loved was based. Since I had seen the movie first, and loved it, I had a biased opinion-but still ended up loving the book.

I read the Green Mile series by Stephen King and when the movie came out, I thought it was a well done adaptation.

Anne Rice's Interview with the Vampire, another great adaptation-we won't mention that monstrocity of a movie called Queen.

I FORCED my way through Wicked, long, strange, unenjoyable book because I plan to go see the play.

To make a long story short (too late), I have seen Under the Tuscan Sun at least a dozen times. I saw the book, and began it this summer and just CAN'T get through the first chapter.

Anyone know if it gets better? It's just so boring! Which bums me out because the film was so great, and narrated, and light with meaning- Ding Dong says the bell. Even the grapes taste purple....

reply

Absolutely not. The book is nowhere near like the movie. It actually has nothing to do with the movie, if I'm not mistaken. Granted, her name is Frances and she ends up in Tuscany and does some cooking, but that's about as similar as they get.

reply

I don't think there has ever been a more misleading movie/book adaptation. I love, love, love the movie, so I got the book. I wasn't a chapter in before I was thinking, "What the hell?" When they reprinted the book with the movie poster on the cover, that was misleading since it was basically a cook book!!!

Just my two cents!

reply

So glad I wasn't the only one! I was so bummed when I started it and felt guilty later when I gave it away!

reply

I love the movie but I can't get through the first few chapters either! It's a completely different story and so far it seems like the Frances in the book and the Frances in the movie have nothing in common besides their names. I'm disappointed because I was really looking forward to learning more about the story, and my copy also has Diane Lane on the cover which just throws things off even more.

I'm surprised the author was ok with the adaption being so different.

reply

I felt the same way when I started to read the book! The only resemblance is the title....but, having said that the villa does have a lot of the little things that are in the movie.

A really boring, and I mean boring book. The area has some of the best wines, so if you go far enough into the book, you will know....ok, I'll tell you D'Abuzzi area of Italy which has awesome wines and olive oils.

She should stick to reviewing recipe books which is what she is mainly know for.

Book....a total yawn, Movie....a really wonderful way to spend a rainy afternoon.

reply

I loved both the movie and the book. I can understand why others wouldn't. Besides a few similar things, the stories are very different.

For example, both the book and the movie have the Polish immigrants. In the movie, Pawel speaks English, but in the book none do. There isn't a subplot invovling him and the neighbor girl, a sort of Romeo and Juliet addition to the story.

You have to remember that the book came first, and the story was Hollywood-ized. The book isn't supposed to be anything other than a lovely little memoir of two people's exploration of Italy over the course of a few years. There's recipes and moments of humor, plenty of local color, and an ambiance of a dream escape that they were lucky enough to actually live.

I'm not taking anything from the film. It's lovely, too, and I'm watching it now on TV. I enjoy it and one of these days when I can actually find it on DVD, I'm going to buy it. The story is different, though, and I like the book and the film for different reasons. It's a bit like two things that are related, but are their own stories in their own right.

---

"Sometimes, you can barely tell the difference... between darkness and light."

reply

I am so glad I found this thread.

I did really like the movie - the scenery was beautiful and the story was fun and warm. So, since all books are better than movies (right?) I got the book. It is so different.

I am enjoying the book, but it was really bugging me that it was so different and send me on an internet search of why. After reading through the thread, it makes more sense and I can let it go now.

The book inspired me to look at Frances Mayes other books, as well as get very energetic about my garden and my kitchen.

Loved them both.

reply

I haven't read the book, though I did buy it recently, but I watched one of the special features on the DVD and they talked a little about translating the book to a movie. From what I remember (and it's been a while, so I hope I'm getting this right), they changed the movie a lot because they decided the book just wouldn't translate well to film as it was - and the author agreed. It also said some of the narration in the movie is quoted from the book. I think the part about the grapes tasting purple was one of those places.

Fortunately, I understood the book was different from the movie when I bought it. Someday I'll read it and find out if I love it as much as the movie in spite of that. Ah... so many books, so little time.

reply

Yes, the book and movie are wildly different. I read the book first years ago and inspired me to travel to Italy, which I later did (and loved it!).

Book - Frances and her boyfriend Ed decide to buy and refurbish an old farmhouse in Tuscany. The book then details the various trials and tribulations it takes (but always with a sense of humour) to accomplish this rather difficult task. There is no conflict in the book as there is in a movie which is why the movie introduces various conflicts and obstacles.

reply

you guys are stupid you can not say the book sucked cause it has a different storyline you have to say you liked the movie more because it has a better suited storyline for what you wanted to see. Get things in order next time. Just saying this because I am

THE 12 YEAR OLD BLUNDER

reply

Have just finished the book. The film certainly does not reproduce the book - but then, it couldn't. There is no real plot in the book - just a sequence of events, feelings and recollections - plus recipes. However most of the events in the film are actually in the book - the contessa "looking for a sign" before selling (actually a different house), the old man at the shrine, the owl in the storm, lightning striking the washing machine and of course the polish workers renovation exploits. Whoever wrote the screenplay did a great job of creating a coherent story from the individual events (interestingly I didn't like the romantic bits - they seemed unnecessary and they don't relate directly to the book (the Romeo & Juliet bits weren't too bad though - especially the Flag Battle - which inspired me to go to Montepulciano this year)

The bit in the film where Francis writes a postcard uses language which is pure Francis Mayes ("Ding Dong says the bell. Even the grapes taste purple.... ").

Loved the film intrigued by the book.

reply

I have not yet read the book. However...

It was my understanding that the movie was loosely based on the person, not the book. All the basic elements are there: Divorce, trip to Tuscany, spur-of-the-moment decision to stay there. But the colorful people and events that filled in the gaps (and fueled the plotline not present in the book) were a fictitious adaptation, loosely based ON those concrete elements that actually DID sum up the life of Fran Mays.

Having learned all of this from an interview with Audrey Wells, and NOT yet having read the book, I can now look forward to reading UTTS, knowing that I can approach it as a seperate entity, and learn more about the life of the writer that intrigued me in the movie I have grown to love so much. Knowing that, I won't be so disappointed by the lack of similarity.

reply