this movie sucked


I recently rented this movie just to see what it was, it sounded interesting when I read the description but I was sitting through the whole thing just waiting for it to be over. Poets probably loved this movie since poetry was the big main thing in it. But Gwen was just so damn annoying it seemed to me evey ten or fifteen minutes she'd say "I tried to drown myself once, or I tried to suffocate myself" jesus christ it didn't seem she was just depressed she wan't attention. this movie was annoying and if people respond to this "topic" that i'm obnoxcious and have no taste for american literature or whatever this is I could care less no matter what they say about me or anything else it's true this movie sucked.

"Jesus Christ Timmy! Do not float above me when I'm dying in the Abyss!"-Dane Cook

reply

............and this from a man who's ranked Zoolander among his top movies.

reply

actaully this is from a girl who likes a variety of movies and will watch anything for entertainment. Basically I rented this movie off of dish on demand and it wasn't worth it but I watched the whole thing so I wouldn'tve wasted my money completely. It was entertaining to some extent but it did suck there was nothing deep or good about this movie. like I said only people interested in poetry would've like this movie. Sorry if i offended you in some way. I don't see what is wrong with zoolander (it had a point which was to save children from child labor)it's a comedy, comedies shouldn't be compared with serious movies because obviously people will say "comedies are stupid" or "omg you like zoolander" when they are talking about A beautiful mind or some movie like that. no right to compare comedies with serious movies. comedies are stupid to you because you don't have a sense of humor.

"Jesus Christ Timmy! Do not float above me when I'm dying in the Abyss!"-Dane Cook

reply

I appreciate that this film was generally a disappointment; as an avid Plath fan I was eager for it to do well and for it to get more attention for Sylvia Plath's amazing life and work. It is probably true that only real fans of Plath will really be able to appreciate the film. It did excel in some areas, namely the riveting performances of Paltrow and Craig, the cinematography and the music score. Paltrow was really able to get into the emotional heart of Plath and her performance is brilliant. However, I feel that the film focused too much on the negative aspects of Plath's life, and did not paint a round picture of her personality, missing out her fascinating years as a student in America. I feel that this film only painted a picture of Plath as a jealous, paranoid, possessive wife, with no identity of her own: this was far from the case, Plath was a brilliant, albeit tortured genius, who had lived an amazing life before she even met Ted Hughes. Any faithful portrait would have included her pre-Hughes years.

reply

even despite all the negative reviews, i liked this film. i've researched plath a little, but i have to agree with you, ra001h7938. it seemed to show only one side of plath. i would have loved to see a more well rounded film that showed her before she met hughes. also, i wish the movie would have included more focus on the genius of her poems. though, a film can only be so long.

i can understand that not everyone would enjoy this film. i think the only reason people would jump on your back would be for the way you go about presenting your ideas. i dont' think anyone can rightfully say this movie "sucks." there were clearly some parts of this film that were truly great. you can't judge a movie solely on it's entertainment value because there are so many more elements to a film.

reply

[deleted]

I think Gwyneth Paltrow was ideal in the role of Sylvia, and she should have gotten an Oscar nomination. So there.

reply



I think Paltrow was very bad. She was way too breathy and fake-sexy when she met Ted and started dancing with him, and in the beginning, when she was reading her poem about death, she acted so precious and was so pretentious it made me want to scream. Paltrow, though a fairly talented actress, doesn't have much intensity: that's probably why she couldn't pull off Sylvia.

reply

[deleted]

I agree-I thought in general this film was a disappointment.I mean whilst it was certainly watchable & all that I thought that Gwyneth Paltrow's performance was lacklustre & that the film in general offered very little insight into the life & mind of Sylvia Plath.I thought it only skimmed the surface of her character at best & concentrated on the negative aspects of her life only.
Talking of big name actresses-Isn't it true that Michelle Pfeiffer was the original choice for the part of Sylvia? Do you think she would have been any better?

reply

[deleted]

After about a year of contemplating seeing this movie, I finally rented it. I've read several books on Plath and have read The Bell Jar and many of her poems. I had heard bad reviews about it, but I decided to see for myself.

And I, too, was disappointed. While I wasn't TOO crazy about Paltrow's performance (I agree, she's very rigid and it's hard to believe any emotion she tries to display), the most disappointing factor was just the content of the film. There were so many struggles and key events earlier in her life that were barely touched on (if at all)that would have allowed to the audience to understand her personality a little better. (i.e. Her father's death had a huge impact on her writing and the rest of her life).
My other main complaint involved how her relationship with Ted was shown. It showed him as a patient man and her as a possesive, jealous, and paranoid wife.
From all the books I read about her, it made Ted sound like the scum of the Earth.
The movie showed too little of her life to be able to appreciate all that she did and went through.

reply

i agree completely. i'm a huge plath fan, but was very disappointed to find so little reference to her poetry in the film. though paltrow's performance had some winning moments, i think the filmmakers (through the writing and editing) didn't do her illness justice. she came across as a jealous wife during most of the film, when it was really much more complicated.

reply

quote//"i agree completely. i'm a huge plath fan, but was very disappointed to find so little reference to her poetry in the film. though paltrow's performance had some winning moments, i think the filmmakers (through the writing and editing) didn't do her illness justice. she came across as a jealous wife during most of the film, when it was really much more complicated."

-Sylvia's daughter Freida didn't want her mother's poetry in this movie or any like it.... at least that is what I heard

which would explain why they didn't use it/much, i don't know I haven't seen this yet

reply

[deleted]

Ok, then. This coming from a GIRL who's quoting Dane Cook......

reply

laughing... I would never see it. I read her words and they were amazing. Her dreams her ticks and tocks her clocks.... her sounds, her dreams, her hopes, her needs, her want... of "the one." I love Sylvia, she was my Bible once, her words, the worse of times, she made it better. Rest in Peace Sylvia.

reply

i appreciate that the film was supposed to be about the relationship between ted and sylvia (as an adaptation of the book), yet i feel the film should have focused a little more on her life before uni- especially for those who are not known to Plath, her life and work.
In some areas of the film I think the film did a good job, in others- i'm not so sure. I know Plath was a very troubled woman and that was her life- she could not help it, but all the 'i once tried to kill myself' stuff, and ted cheating was very repetitive. I understand that the reason this was featured is because it happened, but as a film i think it would have been more watchable if the producer, writer etc had thought about a way to bring that aspedct about without it seeming too tiresome.
After all, for these films to survive, they cannot simply appeal to die-hard fans

reply

I think it was a mistake to cast a 'star' as the title role - we're always concious that we're watching Paltrow, not Plath.

And maybe it's just me but I can't imagine the rather cold and detached Syliva Plath portrayed in this movie writing . . .

Herr God, Herr Lucifer,
Beware
Beware.

Out of the ash
I rise with my red hair
And I eat men like air.

But the movies greatest problem is that it is too damn reserved and reverent . . . Plath was obsessed with blood, insects, the moon, menstruation, the hanged god, fertility, incest, emotional vampirism and death - and all of these are conspicuously absent from this film.

reply

I agree...
It's never a good sign when the audience laughs at "serious" lines...

reply

maybe it's because I have loved Plath for so long... but I was SO disappointed in this movie. While I wouldn't call Paltrow's performance awful, it felt very contrived and superficial to me. Also, I was surprised at the relatively one-dimensional aspect of Plath, Hughes, and Assia Weevil, especially as I'd read that this project was a bit of a pet of Paltrow's and she has also loved Plath's work for a long time. Just an opinion... and who knows, maybe nothing would have satisfied me!

reply

A terrible script can really make a bad name for a movie.

reply

"Isn't it true that Michelle Pfeiffer was the original choice for the part of Sylvia? Do you think she would have been any better?"

God no! Pfeiffer is well into her 40's and Plath was barely 30 when she killed herself, besides Plath was a big healthy American Girl...slim, but 5'9...Ms Pfeiffer is tiny and her other worldly beauty would have been unsuitable for the handsome, but not flashy Plath...Paltrow was perfect IMHO...

"From all the books I read about her, it made Ted sound like the scum of the Earth. "

Ted Hughes was not a monster. You must be reading older books. Newer biographies of the pair, (and Hughes' last book of poems which spoke movingly of the marriage, and his inability to meet Plath's intense emotional needs) portray a very human man...fallible, yes, but basically ill suited to cope with a wife that had a SERIOUS mental illness...in my opinion NO man would have made Sylvia happy...the anti-depressants prescribed at the time were crude at best, they just didn't work very well...more efficacious medicine might have saved Plath's life, but we'll never know since it wasn't available yet....

Considering that Plath's Estate refused to cooperate with the film makers, and the limited time that a Movie can give to such a complicated story, I thought that 'Sylvia' was quite good, and I liked both Paltrow and Daniel Craig's performances...

reply

I saw this movie last night, and don't believe I have ever been more disappointed in a movie in my life. I have a great respect for Plath's work, and was appalled by the fact that the filmmaker's turned her life into a Lifetime Network movie... Did this great poet, who wrote Lady Lazarus and Daddy, really kill herself because her hubby was fooling around? Could you trivialize this tormented girl's life anymore? Why did she attempt suicide at 22? Ted wasn't around, so what was it then? Did the filmmakers even read the poem Daddy?? They quote part of it, but conveniently leave out the parts that imply incest, because it didn't fit in with the 'cheating hubby' story... How about this:
"You stand at the blackboard, daddy,
In the picture I have of you,
A cleft in your chin instead of your foot
But no less a devil for that, no not
Any less the black man who

Bit my pretty red heart in two.
I was ten when they buried you.
At twenty I tried to die
And get back, back, back to you.
I thought even the bones would do.

But they pulled me out of the sack,
And they stuck me together with glue.
And then I knew what to do.
I made a model of you,
A man in black with a Meinkampf look"

Does this sound like a woman who adored her father, as she claims in the movie? Comparing him to Hitler, and a devil? How about this:

'The vampire who said he was you
And drank my blood for a year,
Seven years, if you want to know.
Daddy, you can lie back now.

There's a stake in your fat black heart
And the villagers never liked you.
They are dancing and stamping on you.
They always knew it was you.
Daddy, daddy, you bastard, I'm through.'

They read the last 2 lines, but didn't mention the lines prior at all... There is a hate and a disgust in these lines that can't be conjured without some primal emotion leading one there... When does a vampire come? At night? To drink her blood - or to suck every piece of life from her?
I'm not saying that Ted Hughes and other factors didn't play a part, but to completely disregard her childhood and relationship to her father is just inexcusable.

reply

I saw this movie last night, and don't believe I have ever been more disappointed in a movie in my life. I have a great respect for Plath's work, and was appalled by the fact that the filmmaker's turned her life into a Lifetime Network movie... Did this great poet, who wrote Lady Lazarus and Daddy, really kill herself because her hubby was fooling around? Could you trivialize this tormented girl's life anymore? Why did she attempt suicide at 22? Ted wasn't around, so what was it then?

(...)
I'm not saying that Ted Hughes and other factors didn't play a part, but to completely disregard her childhood and relationship to her father is just inexcusable.

I agree with you on this completely, it was a very shallow movie. And I agree that Sylvia's feelings for her father are crucial to the story. (But her relationship with her mother must not be disregarded either... funny how many people forget that at the same tiem as "Daddy", she wrote an equally vitriolic poem about her mother - "Medusa".)

Did the filmmakers even read the poem Daddy?? They quote part of it, but conveniently leave out the parts that imply incest, because it didn't fit in with the 'cheating hubby' story...

What do you mean by 'parts that imply incest'? Not 'incest' as in actual incest?! because they surely do NOT imply that. They imply an unhealthy obsession with her the memory of her father, which was already all too obvious in the poems such as "The Colossus" and "Electra on Azalea Path", in which she directly references her Electra complex ('Electra', 'Oresteia'). "Daddy" is pretty much the sequel to "The Colossus" - written a few years later, at the time when adoration was turning into hate and rebellion, caused by the failure of her marriage and the feeling of disappointment in Ted; in "Daddy", she obviously mixes her dad and her husband all the time, as one and the same, all-powerful, overbearing male figure of mythical proportions - adored and hated. It's always been clear to me - and I hope it is to other people as well - that the images used in "Daddy" don't actually describe the real Otto Plath or the real Ted Hughes, rather Sylvia's intense emotions at one time and her exaggerated view of them, merging into one and the same mythical figure. And this was already present in "The Colossus" - 'for thirty years now I have worked to dredge the sill from your throat/I am none the wiser'. She wasn't even 30 yet when she wrote that - which corroborates my belief that she wasn't just describing her attempts to preserve the memory of her dead father (this would have taken just 20 years) but her attempts to build up an adored, powerful male figure - father/lover/God - something that exists within a woman's mind/soul and that she has been forming since she was born (the real father is just one, though the most prominent, factor in this) - therefore 'thirty years'.

How about this:
"You stand at the blackboard, daddy,
In the picture I have of you,
A cleft in your chin instead of your foot
But no less a devil for that, no not
Any less the black man who

Bit my pretty red heart in two.
I was ten when they buried you.
At twenty I tried to die
And get back, back, back to you.
I thought even the bones would do.

But they pulled me out of the sack,
And they stuck me together with glue.
And then I knew what to do.
I made a model of you,
A man in black with a Meinkampf look"

Does this sound like a woman who adored her father, as she claims in the movie? Comparing him to Hitler, and a devil?

YES, IT DOES. She definitely did adore him, it's nowhere as obvious as in this poem (and The Colossus). That WAS the problem. She could never be free of her memory of him, she missed him so much that she attempted suicide in order to 'get back to him', as she said. So she found a man that she saw as an extension of her father. But he broke her heart, and her disillusionment and pain make her see the dead father as being as guilty as her husband - for having that terrifying power over her. This is the moment when love turned to hate and when the god, the colossus of the earlier poem became the devil and Hitler.

How about this:

'The vampire who said he was you
And drank my blood for a year,
Seven years, if you want to know.
Daddy, you can lie back now.

There's a stake in your fat black heart
And the villagers never liked you.
They are dancing and stamping on you.
They always knew it was you.
Daddy, daddy, you bastard, I'm through.'

They read the last 2 lines, but didn't mention the lines prior at all... There is a hate and a disgust in these lines that can't be conjured without some primal emotion leading one there... When does a vampire come? At night? To drink her blood - or to suck every piece of life from her?

The hate is there exactly because of the love and adoration. I'm sure you have heard of intense feelings of love turning into as intense feelings of hate.

Where does a vampire come? From the coffin, right? He is a vampire because he is dead, but undead at the same time - because 'he' still has a hold over her, all those years after his death. The only way for her to be free is to drive a stake through his heart - by making him in her mind from God into a devil.






better sorry than safe

reply

Interesting reply, and clearly from someone very knowledgeable and intrigued by Plath's life and works. My issue is that I believe you speak too strongly in your replies, claiming in many cases that you have the only answers...

"What do you mean by 'parts that imply incest'? Not 'incest' as in actual incest?! because they surely do NOT imply that." I read much of Daddy in the same way you do, and only chose to point out the parts that I believed to be critical but left out of the movie. While I can see your points, you seem to disregard mine, which is unfortunate. I will be honest and admit that my undergrad prof 15 years ago argued against much of what I wrote above, stating that these poems where only 'partially autobiographical'... never noting that Ted Hughes was even a part of her anger. I of course now see that he clearly was, but then if Daddy really was this amalgamation of Ted Hughes and her father, then aren't these feelings of love you speak of inextricably bound as well. I don't know, but to me, the love/hate thing that you talk about is also a common symptom of the little girl, scared and confused, who loved her father and can't figure out why he would have done these horrible things to her...
I vaguely remember letters that she wrote when she was 14 or 15 that made me think the same thing, but I understand that isn't a fair statement without more information...
Take care - Dante

reply

Yesd, Ted Hughues was no monster, he was a good poet and a normal man and I agree, that no normal man could happily live with Sylvia. But the femminists made monster out of him, because they pet Sylvia too much. Even as he went to Australia once, there were a posters at the airport saying: Killer of Sylvia Platt! IsnĀ“t it stupid?

reply

My overall feel on it after letting it settle into my consciousness for a few months is that it was lifeless, and humorless. It was nearly as flat as the 1979 (?) film "The Bell Jar." Dreadful stuff.

Those who knew Plath say she didn't photograph as pretty as she was--and the film certainly didn't capture her wit and humor. The film could have been much better. Hopefully Stiles will do better with it.

reply

I thought that it was ok, nothing that I would buy and watch again, but it was good to see. It was however a bit slow, and with most biorgaphies of intresting people it was boring.

reply

I recently watched this movie and found absolutely no way in. The characters were distancing and cold, and there was no way I could feel for them. They seemed like a bunch of a--holes who spent their time speed-reciting poetry and acting like that's stepping into a gladitorial arena (if that's your idea of a good time, then you'd love this movie!). Paltrow was, as always, annoying and ridiculuous and striving in every scene to show off her inability to act.

reply

Julia Stiles!! Now, I hadn't thought of her as possibly playing this role. She would be wonderful -- although maybe a little too young for the later, marriage-&-motherhood scenes.

reply

I, unlike many of you, found this movie to be wonderful. I am also very interested in Plath's works, and her life facinates me. I cannot recommend this movie to anybody who does not know about Sylvia Plath's life. And I cannot recommend this movie to anybody who does not appreciate her/how her psychological state affected the beautiful poetry she wrote. The movie, though it only covered a short span of her life (the last ten years or so) was very accurate. Do not say it sucks unless you are an avid fan. Otherwise, you have no knowledge and no reason to criticize the accurate performances in this film.

reply

"to completely disregard her childhood and relationship to her father is just inexcusable."

Agree. The script is terrible and never get any close to Sylvia Plath. It became just a sad story of a betrayed wife... Thats the opposite of Sylvia, an indepentent women, thinker, A student, hard worker, trying to break through in a conservative society, after the loss of her father and her difficult relashionship with her mother. All it was reduced to a jealous woman, dying for passion and mental sickness... There is no Sylvia in there. It is not the actress fault. None could save it.

"It's all about small stuff. You know, small lies, small mistakes."

reply

Although I'm not obsessed with Plath I'm familiar with her background and have read some of her work. Personally I thought that the movie did her no justice and that I too, dispite being terribly interested by her life, was waiting for the film to just end.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]