MovieChat Forums > Kingdom Hospital (2004) Discussion > Who else felt insulted by this show?

Who else felt insulted by this show?


I did. Stephen King took one of the best TV Horror shows ever (Lars von Trier's Riget aka The Kingdom) and turned it into Ally McBeal. I lost a lot of respect for him.

reply

Haven't seen the series, so can't really comment on content. But I feel insulted anyways - by the title "Stephen King's Kingdom Hospital". The concept was originally Von Trier's. Since when can the adaptor use their name on the title? You shouldn't really mix King with Von Trier, unless when making a bad joke.

reply

I have seen both and I liked them both.

reply

In agree Henkm. There's room for both shows without all this back biting.

reply

King used his own style in his version. As always a little controversial, but enjoyable all the same. King is the great entertainer of our time. He will never Be a Dickens, but he is the best of his generation.
his work is his. He is always original, and he is still the King.

reply

It is funny you say that since Dickens is a writer of low brow pulp fiction. I often talk about how Steven King is the modern Charles Dickens a low brow writer of staggeringly popular books/stories that will carry on long after his lifetime.

Further I feel i should mention Dickens was a constant theif of stories.

reply

Well first, it's not an adaptation. Second, I don't imagine Trier would have been listed as an executive producer if he didn't like King's story.

Two wrongs don't make a left hand turn.

reply

Haven't seen the series, so can't really comment on content. But I feel insulted anyways - by the title "Stephen King's Kingdom Hospital".


That is the network's idea. Very unlikely to be SK's, he has always credited other works that inspire him - in his non fiction books and interviews. The credits made it clear the show is taken from LvT's earlier work.

SK is a world famous name, movies also cash in on his name.

Besides it doesn't matter the show never got a second season so it didn't work out for them.

reply

I never would have heard of Riget if they had not made Kingdom hospital. I loved this mini-series. I have seen the first bit of Riget and am unable to get the rest. Which makes me sad, I wish i could.

It now became apparent (despite the lack of library paste)that something had happened to the vicar;

reply

Count me in. There's nothing redeeming here. It's not scary or thrilling in any way, only predictable and dreary. I find it inconceivable anyone would consider giving this any award other than something akin to Razzie.

reply

Count on Mr. King to take a wonderful and spooky story and turn it into a soap opera bore.
Good work *beep*

reply

I agree with some of you, it was never that bad and we have no need to convince anyone of anything.

reply

That's right! I enjoyed both Riget and Kingdom. I felt a little sorry that all the characters in Kingdom Hospital, which I saw first, didn't necessary appear in Riget. I'd have loved to have seen the Swedish Paul Morlock!

reply

Oh how wrong you are. It isn't Riget and it isn't trying to be. It's only BASED on Riget, but set in the King multiverse. But then I suppose you would have to read in order to understand that.

Two wrongs don't make a left hand turn.

reply

just finished watching Riget, and decided to start KH, but oh my dear god, I couldn't even finish the pilot. running over an hour, it was extremely boring, and most of it felt like just another hospital show, with doctors yelling, nurses running up and down...
the writing, the directing, everything is subpar, it's just another unimaginative, drab, failed network mystery show.
the most disgusting thing was that they kept the characters with Down-syndrome, but in this version they are not like a greek chorus, they act like retarded idiots...

reply

You wrote exactly what I was thinking. I can also add that Riget's exquisite intelligent humor was replaced here by stupid slapstick gags.

reply