My take on the movie


I have an interpretation of my own that seems to be different from what most said. I think Gray was actually just an average guy with a great imagination. The whole movie is pretty much about an inner conflict between his obligations as a boyfriend and his love for movies.

He loved movies because it helped him escape reality. To me, the last scene made the premise simple. Especially the last line when the girl says “You’re gonna leave me for her, aren’t you?” That line (in a metaphorical way) sums up what he is feeling on the inside. He has his girl that loves him and, like most girls, will do what he wants to please him. They go to the movies even though she's tired of that and while watching the movie she tries to get his attention but he doesn’t budge. This showed me that his obsession with movies is causing some minor tension in his relationship and there have been times when he feels as though he is choosing between his girlfriend and wanting to watch/pay attention to movies. With all this in his head, his imagination goes loose and makes up the whole story about him being famous and going mad. Most of the aspects of the story playing in his mind are taken partly from the movie he is watching and partly from the things he's seen in real life. If my theory holds true, then it would make sense for some of the characters to be as one-dimensional as they were because they were just a representation of something in his life. This would also explain the personality shifts and the bending of the reality that the actor is experiencing since it is more of metaphorical thoughts instead of actual events. In a way, it is sort of a daydream that his brain is using in order to make sense of his actions and to reach a certain level of contentment that he hasn’t been able to reach. He is a man battling his own demons. His fantasy simply mirrors his real life. Let me try to illustrate this for you by pointing out his real life in numbers and his imagination in letters:


1. He lives a simple life and obsesses over movies.
A. He hates being in Hollywood and obsesses over the simple life.

2. He neglects his girlfriend because of movies.
B. He resents Hollywood because of the breakup with his ex-girlfriend.

3. He resorts to simple measures by using his imagination to examine a real issue that he has.
C. He resorts to drastic measures and lives his life through other people in order to deal with issues within himself.




I won’t go on. Hopefully that’s enough to give you a gist on my take on this film. Overall, I thought it was an excellent movie and I loved the cameos in it. With that said, I understand why this movie has such a small fan base. It isn’t as easy to enjoy as it is to admire. Most people that didn’t like it either didn’t pay attention or didn’t give it a chance. Now that you made it this far, what do you think of my view? If there are any holes or just anything that I might be missing I’d be nice to know.

reply

I think your view on the movie is interesting. I never thought of it like that before. I hope it comes back on tv soon so I can pay closer attention to it. I was bored the other night surfing through the channels and I came across this and I am glad I did because the movie was pretty good. I think I might buy it on DVD.

___________________________
Silly...Yes. Idiotic...Yes.

reply

Thanks so much Warvelo for this awesome and thoughtful review of this movie. I just purchased it but have yet to watch it. I'm a big fan of Giovanni Ribisi's and am looking forward to watching this one. Thanks for adding to the experience. Muchly appreicated.

Just. . . . . IMAGINE


reply

[deleted]

thanks for posting your take, it was a good read. i don't know if i completely agree on this interpretation although i can't communicate my own, but it's always very intersting to read other viewers' understanding of a movie.
was this movie released into theatres? i doubt anyone would have gone and seen it, the whole thing was so obscure. this movie is definately an arty person's movie. i thought it was great, although not that entertaining.

it's a dirty world Reich, say what you want

reply

That's actually how I took it, but I don't know... Maybe that was kind of the point, that you DON'T know what's real and what isn't.

reply

[deleted]

good analysis on the ending. I would have to say i agree. either way you look at it, anyone who made it through the ending before coming on to this website to say anything about it is cool in my book, unlike some people who think that they know a movie and its ending without ever seeing it.

reply


i would agree with this as well,

but still why do u think at the beginning it shows the actor in the musical with ricci and she calls him gray and at the end its ribisi and ricci .?

reply

I can't quite tie myself down yet to one reading of this movie - there are multiple ways to interpret it, and I'd like to see it again before I can even ballpark it - but yours is one of the frontrunners. One thing I kept noticing while watching is that the "fantasies" he keeps having of life with Shana (and/or Jane) are a lot more plausible than the supposed reality of a young movie star stalking and kidnapping one of his fans. It's just so outlandish, and the stuff with Shana is quite mundane by comparison, especially for a fantasy.


It is 5 AM, and you are listening to Los Angeles.

reply

i dont really think that is the case hear. i think most of the flashbacks were just goldberg trying to be clever and confuse us the way ribisi was confused. ribisi was in the midst of a mental breakdown and lost it. thats all.

reply