SUCKS
this will be horrible! i think its a rip off when they dont use th same people in sequels...its just pointless....
sharethis will be horrible! i think its a rip off when they dont use th same people in sequels...its just pointless....
shareI saw this load of crap, it was the worst movie i have ever seen.
shareI can't beileve this *beep* has as high as a 3.9 and 13 peopl gave i a 10. It sucked!
Signature (up to 100 chars markup enables)
Really...indeed.
I automatically give this stupid sequel my "Stinker of the Year" Award for 2004.
(Last year's film was "Tom and Jerry: The Movie" from 1992, which I gave a 5.)
I know I had to watch this movie on my birthday because my friend wanted to and seriously i knew it was gonna suck the minuit i saw who was playing gorege.my friend was sitting on the floor and I was lying on the couch HALF ASLEEP!my only interest in the whole freakin movie was what was going on with Ape.
shareI personally agree with you. I think this movie will suck even though I haven't watched it yet. But I saw the commerical of this and I already knew that I would hate this movie.
shareWow... you can tell that a movie will suck BEFORE you watch it?
Where did you get this psychic power from, and can you predict the stock market too?
Seriously, nothing annoys me more than people who say "Oh, I don't like that" without giving it a chance.
Worst sequel ever - I saw 15 minutes of it and I walked away so fast. I don't think I ever "walked out" on a movie before. I think the worst is that George still talks like a neanderthal and refers to himself in the third person. "George love Ursula" "George make everything better now" ARGH. You'd think that after living with his educated American wife for about 5 years he's learn a little something. That plus Ursula's mother - she was fine with the wedding at the end of the first movie then completely changed her mind about it. Also, I've never seen a sequel with lso few of the original actors from the first, especially the main character. Ok whew, done ranting.
shareabsoloutely agreed. what sucks the most is they didn't cast brandon fraser or ANY of the original cast. terrible acting, terrible plot. there were some funny parts but the whole thing was just too predictable. first one was way better!!
shareActually, John Cleese and Thomas Haden Church were in the original.
"Stupidity is a disease. Be sure and get vaccinated."
HEy everybody i totally agree with u
im a teenager and we had 2 watch it at skool. i fell asleep halfway thru it coz it was soo pointless ansd boring'
but my teacher mr tucker was in it. he was in a band that walked around the family at some point. weird huh?
sequels dont usually rise up 2 the first one and this was no exception!
Guns dont kill People... But they sure make it easy :)
One reason this movie sucks ass.
NO BRENDAN FRAISER!!!!
The movie was hilarious when they explained why Brenden Fraiser wasn't in the sequel. They should've ended the movie there. I watched this piece of tripe because it was on ABC Family and I thought it was appropriate for my 8-year-old son. I'm a firm believer that kids should have movies appropriate for viewing, but if this is the level these so-called "family" movies have sunk to, I'd rather let my kid watch Nightmare on Elm Street. To say this movie sucked is giving it far more credit than it deserves. Disney's probably rolling in his grave right now, poor man.
shareYou can not trust disney to make great sequels. they go and make great movies than pound it into an early grave every time
share[deleted]
[deleted]
it was ok. i can still like sequels even if the original ppl aren't back like in this one. but they should've used puppets for tookie and rocky. cgi can look great in movies, but only if the cgi is actually done right. the cgi in here was WAY too obvious. it helped having the original narrator, too. and angus is adorable as jr!
Wolverine: Hey hey, it's me.
Cyclops: Prove it.
Wolverine: You're a dick.
Cyclops: Ok.
Even Brandon knew it was bad.
share