THE ENDING - Too Young to Be a Dad (2002) Discussion

[–] BabyMissyKat 18 years ago

Matt keeps his baby daughter and his family agree to help

reply

[–] megmaria 18 years ago

it isn't a gd ending though

reply

[–] 18 years ago

[deleted]

[–] jughead10m 18 years ago

Yes he keeps his daughter but doesn't have Francesca at all after the sacrafice he made for her in regard to changing schools and helping her out with the money he made from his pizza job. This doesn't make sense that he and his sister and his Mom and Dad agree to help him raise the baby he chose to keep and Francesca chose not to do anything in anyway yet she loved him alot. I wish I could understand this more. Will Matt have another future and will he meet a new girl to marry later on and help him raise that baby and will Fransesca eventually want to visit the girl she was pregnant with.

reply

[–] toriii 18 years ago

And they name the baby Genevieve

reply

[–] Glittergirl1689-2 18 years ago

He names the baby Genevieve

***Rebecca***Darn you, darn you to heck

reply

[–] lemonadey50 18 years ago

I think that this is a good ending for the movie. I think that Francheska's parents probably won't ever let her see matt (I think that is his name...the dad anyway) or the baby again.

reply

[–] ashleigh784 17 years ago

To the poster a few posts above this, I don't think Francesca loved Matt. I think she liked him, the end. I also think her parents were very, very controlling and she wouldn't have had much say in the matter, even if she wanted to.

-Ashleigh

reply

[–] psychadelicflower 17 years ago

What the flip kind of town do they live in where the trees have no leaves in the middle of June? Did anyone else notice this when they brought Gennovive home?

reply

[–] discoeterno713 17 years ago

lmao You're so random ^.^

reply

[–] nihilistwonder 17 years ago

"What the flip kind of town do they live in where the trees have no leaves in the middle of June? Did anyone else notice this when they brought Gennovive home?"

The same kind of town where 2 young teens can, apparently, produce a baby that's already 2-3 months old, just about holding her own head up, and big eyes without that newborn scrunch--- indeed, all but crawling already.

Seriously, this actually wasn't half bad for this kind of movie (I sniffled a little), but they really could have cast an infant that looked a lot more brand-new than the one they featured--- it's been done before.

As for the town, where WAS it supposed to be? The homes looked New-England-ish, typical seaside "weathered" siding, etc.

"Shake me up, Judy!"

reply

[–] MandraModdle 17 years ago

The same kind of town where 2 young teens can, apparently, produce a baby that's already 2-3 months old, just about holding her own head up, and big eyes without that newborn scrunch--- indeed, all but crawling already.

Haha I noticed that too. It's no wonder Francesca's labor was difficult. She was having a 3 month old baby!

-Jane Lane-

http://www.myspace.com/maris821

reply

[–] Belstarwon 17 years ago

by law you can't use a baby in film that is less then 2 months old or something like that. Thats why no one really ever truly has a "newborn" on tv

reply

[–] MandraModdle 17 years ago

I thought that in Kevin Smith's film, Jersey Girl, the baby they used at the beginning did look closer to a newborn's age. I didn't know about that law, though.

-Jane Lane-

http://www.myspace.com/maris821

reply

[–] slayingsavagegiants 16 years ago

No, she's right. Babies have to be at least 2 months old before they can be in films. Every movie is like this..they give birth and the baby looks older. It's not a new thing.

Whoa! Dream Big!!
R.I.P Heath Ledger.

reply

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] bebegirl2009 13 years ago

Just because you are a murderer doesn't mean everyone is. If my birth mother had believed in abortions I wouldn't be here. Plus, you do the crime, you pay the consequences...not the baby. As in, you give birth and then give the child to a decent human being to raise.

reply