Parallels between 'Tideland' and 'Oasis'
I just saw Terry Gilliam's "Tideland", and I'm still digesting it. On one hand, I think it's a masterpiece. It's unconventional, surreal, and has an amazing lead and perfect supporting characters. On the other hand, it's creepy and feels exploitative, even though objectively it is not. I see a lot of parallels between this movie and "Oasis", which is one of my top 10 favorite films.
Off the top of my head:
1) Both movies deal with unconventional romantic or semi-romantic relationships between the leads.
2) Both have a retarded male love interest.
3) Both have an abusive and neglectful sister as a primary caregiver (In "Oasis" it's the girl's sister, in Tideland it's the boy's sister).
4) Both movies incorporate fantasy and surrealism.
5) Both have female leads who are extremely and literally isolated, both physically and mentally.
6) Both female leads have serious health problems (In "Oasis", Gong-ju has CP, in "Tideland", Jeliza-Rose spits blood and is severely malnourished).
7) In both films, "nothing" happens for large amounts of time. This can be disconcerting to Western audiences; due to the way they interpret genre clues and the pacing they expect.
I'm sure there are more. Whether that counts for or against "Tideland", I can't decide. And, they are also very different movies as well! At this point I would I rate "Tideland" a very VERY interesting failure, but also a fine addition to the Canon of Gilliam (perfect infallibility and artistic inerrancy!).
I understand "Tideland" did well in Japan, especially with female audiences. This is not surprising, as Japanese girls are well known in the tech world as being way ahead of the curve.