My take on 'GMM' and the future of it. Does it have a chance?
(by dane youssef)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"We're not re-running episodes of "GMM" this season because of the lack of interest. We can air an all-new "GMM" or an old-re-run of "Wil & Grace" and it's the "Will & Grace" that the viewers will all tune in to watch."--Jeff Zucker, NBC.
Well, there's no arguement there. I think it's a good thing that they took "GMM" off of Thursday night Must-See-T.V. It's... well, it's NOT Must-See-T.V.
The problem with "Good Morning, Miami" in episode one----
It was originally in the first season the awful weather nun and cuban co-anchor (Brooke Dillman and Bessie Santiago, two very strong talents saddled with awful characters and non-existant material).
As well as the normally talented Ms. Suzanne Pleshette as Jake's horny, crotchety, preachy grandmother---a horny, foul-mouthed, crusty, preachy little old lady. Oh, there's a novel and intriguing character.
The characters--all of them--are directly from the bottom of the bargain bin at the inspiration shop. Characters with more than their fair share of mileage on them. Vey, very, very familiar sit-com types.
The boorish, pompous blowhard of an anchorman. The bumbling, goofy, self-depricating, prat-falling sidekick. The horny, swearing, crusty and dirty little-old lady. The lazy, bitter, sarcastic and insulting gen-X geek secretary who keeps her job and does nothing but hurl out insults and slow down productivity. The empty-headed object of affection. The normal guy at the center of it all---trying desprately to keep his sanity. All as old as the history of the sit-com itself. Perhaps older.
Of course, originality alone is not enough to make a good sit-com. Take for example Feuerstein's disasterous first lead, "Conrad Bloom.' A truly orignial and intriguing premise ruined by a flat, slow and uninspired execution.
As for the nun, co-anchor and grandma--the crap of the crop-- the three are now
gone.
Now it's not really so much what's on the show that's the problem---it's what's not there.
This could be a rare opportunity for the creators and writers to punch up the characters--elaborate on these cliches.'
But these old thin stock-types have now been, in season two, replaced by fresh ones. That's right, fresh cliched', trite' characters.
Instead of fixing the ones they have, their pulling out OTHER stocktypes to introduce to Miami. This is not the way to go.
We've seen these characters many, many, many times before. Usually with much more depth, humanity and insight. Much more interest. Every single sequence and story-line is right out of the old sit-com playbook, run-into-the-ground. Every single character's feelings and reactions all are at serice of the plot or for the sake of a cheap, easy, trite' joke---usually either bombing or landing with a thud.
Jake embarasses himself repeatedly, even when Dylan is NOT around. But it doesn't feel really like Jake is doing it because he's dub-struck by love or because he's goofy. He's just doing what the plot and the easy-set up of a really old and lame joke require him to.
This guy is supposed to be a hot-shot producer who has people all over bidding for his Midas-touch to TV!!!
But he seems more like a gofer. A little prat-falling, self-depricating sidekick who has the position of gofer and comic relief.
That CAN maybe work, if this guy WAS the side-kick. But hell, he's the lead! This guy here is the headliner.
The leading man and instead of being so much of a straight-man, he's really more of a punching bag for everyone else. He does not so much humiliate himself for Dylan, or Penny, or Gavin, or Claire... or hell, even Victoria.
He just humiliates himself period, becuase the Jake character is not developed enough AS a character to do anything else! Which makes it boring and disapointing... when it's not annoying.
Instead of having the characters all tear into each other (which would be really funny and entertaining), they all just tear into Jake. They all push him over and steamroller over JUST him.
While something like that COULD, once again, BE funny---it's not here because Jake is just too easy a target. He's a sitting duck. He's just a big push-over. It's funny to take away a character's dignity IF THEY HAVE IT.
But if just no challenge, it's just NOT FUNNY. It's just bullying. And comes off as kind of cruel.
Humilating Jake is basically just like shooting dead fish in a shotglass.
Mark Feuerstein has been dubbed by wags as "the murderer of a thousand sit-coms" and "batting for Tom Arnold's record," as well as " a stale ham sandwich on rye."
After watching the show, perhaps his spotty track record may not have been ENTIRELY his fault.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dylan, I'm afraid, is just as bad.
Now I love Ashley Williams, I really do. I am only 4 years her junior. I want to be fair here.
There are many who refer to her as "beautiful and sexy."
I think this is somewhat inaccurate. As one of her biggest fans, I find her to be cute and adorable. Yes, cute and adorable. That seems like the best way to describe her. Like a puppy or a teddy-bear. She's got those chipmunk-cheeks.
But her character Dylan is just a bore. It's not that she's by means annoying and grating as the hispanic co-anchor and the nun, she's just boring. Dylan is just boring. Like a piece of untoasted, untouched plain white bread. Poor Ashley, after her sint on "As the World Turns," is given the character with all the depth of a cardboard cut-out.
As a matter of fact, they could have gotten a cardboard prop to serve her job of the show. She exists soley to keep Jake there and for him to make a babbling goon out of himself whenver she walks in. WHY does Jake have feelings for her, maybe it is just a crush.
Oh right, he has to have interest in this woman becuase... well, than there IS no show. There's nothing else in Miami to hold our interest (at least not on this show!)
Then again, HIS character isn't very interestng either.
Occasionally, SHE makes fun of Jake, too. And others, but not much, really. No wonnder Ashley's character smiles all the time when she's on. Otherwise, she falls into the back-ground---she's just so uninteresting.
"Smile, Ashley, smile! So they know you're there!"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would love to see Jake grow some huevos and dignity--all well as some depricating wise-cracks for the rest of the staff who pisses him off, Dylan
Like I said before, all the characters are all-stocktypes and the jokes and plot-points and themes are all cliches.' I've seen the character of Penny played before. The surly, lazy, insulting office-secretary who's a walking, living, breathing technical difficulty. And dresses... well, "eccentrically" at best. Kathy Griffin on "Suddenly Susan"... Beth on 'NewsRadio"... Vickie on "Larry Sanders..." etc.
But it's obvious why the actress, Constance Zimmer has her own fan-base from this show. Her character is the most interesting and developed. And Constance herself is something of a cuite. She does manage to get quite some mileage out of the character, despite the limitedness of the Penny character overall. She gives the thin and limited Penny some spark.
As for the on-air anchorman, he as well is made much out of what could have been a character that was pure plot-device, like the leads. The arrogant, foppiash blowhard is well-played by Leschter. He perhaps gives the strongest performance on the show. Leschter has played roles like this before, paticularly in his break-out role Captain Love in "The Mask of Zorro." Leschter miks and works Gavin for all it's worth. He has some funny banter and back-and-foths with Jake.
Or at least, he could. The show's best moments come from the back-and-forth between Jake and Gavin. Or at least they did. When the two snarl, gnash teeth and butt-heads, it's really funny. But the show mutes those moments. Almost as if it doesn't want to develop that much. As if it's too afraid to move past it's clcihed' and level-one status. Is the REAL PROBLEM with "GMM" that it just doesn't have the balls?
Max and David have remarked that they came up with the idea for this show when they were working as producers of an awful talk-show which was like "Regis & Kathie Lee' at ground-zero. That was their inspiration from this show. And the character of Jake Silver is somewhat directed at Jeff Zucker, the hot-shot producer who came into the dying Today Show and made it a hit. The humiliation of Jake is just a case of Max & David chewing on the hand that feeds it. That's all well and good, but many of us at home don't know who Jeff Zucker is, nor have we at home actually met Jeff. The folks backstage at NBC behind-the-scenes get to have a few giggles, but we're kind of left in the dark here. It's an INSIDE joke and we're out HERE.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dylan at times speaks an articulate theory and has moments of poetic truth and then becomes a babbling, drooling idiot whenever the plot seems to require her to. Her knowledge and idiocy both seem scripted--at service of the plot and story. She's not a real person, but then again, neither is anybody else here.
Who will RE-VAMP "Good Morning, Miami"? Who will save it? I don't think it would hep to have Jake leave, but clearly this is a show in danger. Who will save it?
It's a really mediocre show that needs re-vamping ABOUT a mediocre show that needs re-vamping. Is this delibarite? Perhaps. Perhaps Max, David & NBC are just lazy. I sort-of enjoyed the first show and thoguht it had promise. Almost every single show after that, "GMM" was breakning it's promise.
HERE, I WROTE THIS LETTER TO NBC, PLEAING THEM TO IMPROVE THE SHOW AND HOW. TAKE A LOOK:
Hello, NBC and crew of "Good Morning, Miami"
(And especially you, Mr. Jeff Zucker)---
I'm a long-time viewer of "NBC." This is my first time writing to the show. You can all rest assured that this letter, I am merely writing my suggestions to the show and not a voicing some kind of angry letter. I have been a viewer of "Good Morning, Miami" ever since it's T.V. debut. My attention for this show really picked up when it was revealed that the Penny character (Constance Zimmer) had feelings for the male lead (Mark Feuerstein). As well as a lot of the attention of a lot of other viewers.
I have been a viewer of your show "Good Morning, Miami" since it's debut. Many have proclaimed it to be ROCK-BOTTOM. It was filled to the brim with stock-type sit-com characters, time-weary plots and obvious banter. In my opinion, the show STARTED at rock-bottom.
But the show really DOES seems to be improving. I don't know if you plan on answering this letter personally or maybe taking some of this under real consideration, but I do have some real suggestions for the show and how to keep improving the show. I made numerous comments on the unofficial "Good Morning, Miami" website about the show and gave a lot of advice. I register on the username: "surfur." I've made more than a few suggestions to improve the show and surprisngly... some of them have been coming true. I don't know if this is just luck, coincidence or if you guys have been going to those sites to see what the viewing public feels. But either way, i thought just to make sure my opinions get across, I'd e-mail you DIRECTLY.
That said, I really do think you'll find some interesting ideas here...
It's true, the show did get some truly awful reviews--from both the press and the viewing public:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEGATIVE REVIEWS FOR "GOOD MORNING, MIAMI"
---"But most every character on Good Morning, Miami is underdeveloped and clichéd. What makes the exaggerated characters in Will & Grace funny is that they're written as parodies of stereotypes, the nelly, arrogant gay best friend, and rich, alcoholic bitch. On Good Morning, Miami, the characters don't mock the stereotypes (crusty but wise grandmother, self-centered tv anchor, gen-x punk); they are the stereotypes." --- Michael Abernethy popmatters.com
---"What did the poor folks of Miami do to deserve this unfortunate honor? Mark Feuerstein plays a hot young producer sent in to rescue the worst-rated morning show in the country, but not even Katie Couric could rescue this ratings stinker. Despite springing from the groundbreaking minds behind Will & Grace, the station ensemble is so cookie cutter, it's cringeworthy: A wisecracking nun "weathergirl", a groveling station manager, and a Cuban-American co-host who seems to be taking style tips from the Chiquita banana lady. Ick.
Watch-37% Pass-63%
Bottom Line: Say good night, Miami, and don't bother taking a bow."--E! Online
---"This show has basically the same premise as NewsRadio. Even the characters are suspiciously similar! The show is about a TV producer who travels to Miami to revamp a morning show. NewsRadio was about Dave Nelson, who travels to New York to become WNYX's new News Director. Both shows are from the perspective of that one individual. Both shows have a lazy assistant (Beth on NewsRadio, Penny on Miami), and Miami even goes so far as to cast an Andy Dick clone (Jere Burns) who is constantly in ridiculous situations and hospital incidents (the dart in the arm episode). He's not even that far from looking like Andy Dick's character! You could say that Gavin is close to Bill McNeal of WNYX but he pales in comparison to the late, great Phil Hartman. The only thing that separates the two is that there's a love them on Miami, with Jake fawning over Dylan. This show either needs a massive revamp, or to be yanked off the air and scolded as the pretender it is." Aaron Knowlton IMDb
---"A train-wreck of a show...
This show is lame, lame, lame. I doubt it will last the rest of the current season. A brutally horrible show - that became clear in the first several minutes of the pilot episode. This show deserves to die a horrible death. Every lame sex-joke cliche one can think of. Even Jere Burns is not funny here. Suzanne Pleshette is downright embarrassing (and she was so good on the Bob Newhart show)
The one bright spot: Ashley Williams, the love interest. She is just so cute and perky - with a smile that can light up a room. We will undoubtedly hear more from/about this little sweetheart...." Jeff FenwayIMDb
--"TV at its worst!
Okay, the producers (who also produce Will & Grace) have obviously flexed some powerful muscle at the network to even get this past the pilot stage. It is the most annoying lame sitcom ever with possibly the worst writing in history. The cast (except poor Suzanne Pleshette), are totally boring and uninteresting especially the inane moronic nun. I could not believe my eyes and ears when this first aired (after Will & Grace, of course) and am even more shocked that its still on the air! Television hits an all time low with this."-- catchyj IMDb
--" Built-In Flaw
The two leads are appealing enough, but there's a built-in flaw to this show: Since the premise is Jake's unspoken crush on Dylan, the weekly plots won't waver too much from one contrived effort after another to keep them apart. This can only happen so many times before we get sick of it-especially when there are no other supporting characters to sustain our interest.(The "weather nun", in particular, is an embarrassment) Why does Dylan's boyfriend have to be such an insufferable jerk? Doesn't this devalue her? Beyond that, the show is trite and unfunny. I can't imagine why an old pro like Suzanne Pleshette would consent to do this series. She deserves better. So do we. "-- luvuwildbill IMDb
--" Hope it doesn't last or gets a makeover
Booth troy made note of all the shows starring Jewish guys and Gentile chicks. I thought I was the only one who noticed this. He forgot "Ed." I'm guessing the reason is because this the fantasy for many Jewish director/producers in Hollywood.
There is some funny dialogue in this movie. But I can't overlook its flaws:
*Suzanne Pleshette as Fuerstein's GRANDMOTHER?
*The caricature of a Hispanic woman. I hear they are firing her, but it would be ridiculous to have a show based in Miami with only WASPs and one Jewish guy. I hope they at least replace her with a less stereotypical character.
*The male lead is not someone you WANT Dylan to fall in love with. He's pretty boring and not as good looking as her.
*There isn't a lot of chemistry between Dylan and the male lead.
If they're not canceling this show I hope they at least improve or revamp these aspects. Of course, these complaints go to the heart of what the show is all about."-- Jelly-4 IMDb
--"Simply horrible
NBC has done it again. While they frequently create fantastic, likeable, original shows like "Ed", "Law and Order" and "Friends", they also create generic, dull flops like this show, which rely on jokes and situations that have been beaten to death and beyond in previous sitcoms. I hope they end it and end it soon."-- Thepatriot45 IMDb
Well, enough already, right? You get the idea. I'm sure you guys read the panning that this show got. But anyway, my point is....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While it can be safely said that when the show first started out, it was actually kind of mediocre. The show was panned and assaulted with bad reviews--by both the critics and the viewing public. But the show seems to be really developing now. I know that you have been considering cancelling "Good Morning, Miami" in favor of some new, fresher shows. And while the viewer response to "GMM" isn't nearly as strong as the response to the other, more-popular "Must-See-TV" Thursday line-up's like "Seinfeld", "Friends" and "Will and Grace," hit-shows are quite hard to come by. Don't throw away what could be another real ratings-topper so early.
Yes, the first couple of episodes were pretty awful due to numerous and obvious problems: The cookie-cutter characters (the blowhard and pompous anchorman, the lazy, obnoxious and insulting secretary, the crotchety little old-lady who's also filled to the gills with one liners and also is a romantic advice-dispenser, and finally, the pratfalling office idiot) with formulaic and overdone sit-com plots and jokes that felt like they were written seprately and just shoved into a script regardless of how unnatural they sound in this context or how they don't fit the situation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But it seems to have evolved--moving upwards---since then. The viewer praise has been a real firestorm
[email protected]
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=58175682