Horror?


I'm not really sure that I would call this or any other movie of this type, (serial killers), horror movies. Disturbing yes, brutal yes, thought provoking yes, disgusting yes, depressing yes, etc... But not what I really consider "horror".

Sure, we can all be horrified by the possibility that someone like this lives next door to us or down the road from us, or even worse, in our own families. But, when I think "horror movie" I don't consider movies like Pulp Fiction to be films in the horror genre. Which this movie is similar to.

To me, horror movies must have a touch, to a greater or lesser degree, of the supernatural in them. I'm not saying that all filmmakers should just stick to remakes of Frankenstein, etc.

You can hear/read about individuals like this in newspapaers everyday.
You know, prescription pill addicted zombies that slaughter office buildings and schools full of innocent victims. Too many people are just one more Ambien or Xanax away from sleepwalking through a series of voluntary or involuntary murders! But, that is for the courts to sort out.

Just gimme a Romero zombie flick anyday over these ripped from the headlines serial killer movies.

reply

Generalizing a tad, there are two sides to horror. Supernatural horror, and true horror. The latter being what the "Serial Killer" sub-genre belongs to.

- Horror
(1.) An overwhelming and painful feeling caused by something frightfully shocking, terrifying, or revolting; a shuddering fear: to shrink back from a mutilated corpse in horror.

Doesn't just have to be a ghost or a vampire to be "horror". Keeping in mind that there are ultimately no "black and white" set rules for genres, they are ever changing and criss-crossing into each other. So genre definition mostly come down to semantics.

Yes one could say that "shocking" or "scary" subject matter in a sci-fi, fantasy, drama or action movie does not make it a horror movie. But I would say that such a film simply contains "horror elements".

The non-supernatural "real crime" sub-genre is a large part of horror. It has been very well established since the 70's, with some well known titles such as John Carpenter's Halloween, Tobe Hooper's Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Wes Craven's Last House on the Left for example.




"Death solves all problems, no man no problem" - Stalin

reply

BUMP



"If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? " - Peter Kay

reply

HUMP

reply

*beep* this movie sucked!

reply

Fair enough, but care to offer an explanation?




UNCOMPROMISING UNDERGROUND FILTH

reply

Sure. The concept was interesting. The acting was definately good. Unfortunately, it got boring quite quickly. It most definately didn't, "get me thinking" or wonder, "how did he know what I was thinking??"

reply

Ohhhh k.

Hell, I only came for the butchered bitches.



UNCOMPROMISING UNDERGROUND FILTH

reply

SPOILER ALERT!!!

The reason for this movie's title is not because it's so good it's the ultimate horror flick, but a bit more sofisticated. At the beginning, someone is sitting down to watch some cheesy horror flick, but instead comes to watch this 'documentary' about a serial killer. By the end, the audience and the one watching the film inside the film realise that he is the next victim. So, for him, this truly is The Last Horror Movie. Maybe, just maybe, it will be your last one, too...

I think the film is very good, and the title is brilliant.

reply

im only going to look for this because joe hurley is in the cast.hurley was a mixed martial arts fighter who i liked

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]