MovieChat Forums > House of the Dead (2003) Discussion > Is it entertaining for the sheer crap va...

Is it entertaining for the sheer crap value?


me and my friends have crap movie night every friday for the last 8 weeks. cool day, we've still got a few movies to see but we're kinda picking at random now, so I know Uwe Boll's films are kinda like what you get when satan wipes his ass, but are they at least funny in a totally terrible way (think...bad taste) or are they just plain bad? (supercroc...oh god...)

reply

I started watching it tonight (last night) on the SciFi channel and, after about 20 minutes, opted to watch the news instead. When I switched back, it wasn't enough to hold my interest, despite the zombie fighting.


Tho it is dark . . . know our flag . . . is still there.

reply

Few years late lol, but yep, woeful film, and the techno music in every scene ruined any sort of horror it was supposed to have.

reply

[deleted]

Yes and no. Be prepared for being really bored when watching this drivel, but there are some few unintentionally hilarious moments, like insanely bad moments of acting, the damn overbearing techno music in the action scenes and the bafflingly sloppy editing. See it ONLY for its reputation, not to have "The Room" or "Birdemic" kind of fun.

reply

Yeah its not a good film but its at least amusing.

reply

[deleted]

Sorry, this is a crappy movie for making crap sake. It's almost like they intended to make a bad movie, they succeeded. But, they didn't make it funny if that was the goal let's make a bad movie make it so bad it's good and it's funny. They succeeded in somehow making fight scenes boring. I have never seen that in a movie before so they got that going for them.

reply