MovieChat Forums > In Enemy Hands (2005) Discussion > Scott Caan was HORRIBLE!

Scott Caan was HORRIBLE!

posted 17 years ago by theleftboot
8 replies | jump to latest

Wow! This movie might have been decent but having Scott Caan cast in such a high profile profile role doomed the movie. Until this movie I did not fully realize how HORRIBLE of an actor is Scott Caan.

I will be sure to avoid his movies in the future.

What could have been a 6/10 movie was a 2/10 largely due to his HORRIBLE performance as a U.S. submarine commander. Completely unbelievable.

At the very start, the beard begins AFTER the submarine goes to sea.

His acting was worse than the beard.

I am glad this was a Netflix film and not one I paid $5-10 to watch.

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] flan99 16 years ago

Scott Caan sucked.

He was either smirking, or doing a bad imitation of his Daddy.

[–] bobsphotography2000 16 years ago

Wasn't his daddy the actor investigated as a suspect in a Los Angeles homicide a few years ago. Maybe the movie was made about that time & his thoughts were of that issue? Naaaa. He just got the part cause of daddy. Never mind.

[–] Zuider_Zee 12 years ago

He was so wooden I'm surprised he isn't plagued with termites.

[–] Ginnn 11 years ago

yeah he is pretty horrible.

It is fun and games until someone gets caught. Then it's rape.

[–] easyrhino 10 years ago

Caan was a disaster, only Seth Rogen would have been worse.

I watched the movie for free and I still want my money back.

[–] IzzardRox 9 years ago

I just watched this and I actually started laughing when I realized that he was The Captain!!! Just didn't make any sense, and he just was trying too hard to act all grown up.

Who's Deanna??

[–] ipeedaily 9 years ago

Agreed.....reminded me of George W Bush trying to act like a president...lol.