MovieChat Forums > Eve (2002) Discussion > This Seems Like A Cheap Excuse For Porno

This Seems Like A Cheap Excuse For Porno

posted 19 years ago by richard_crocitto
6 replies | jump to latest

altough this movie is SUPPOSED to be a semi-religious film, it seems more like an excuse for cheap porno flick, the majority of the movie is a naked man and woman touching and kissing, they only relevance to the idea of the film is the fact that it is filmed in open desert like areas, accept for the snowey scenes, and i wonder, how can a woman who can't know that much, walk from the hot tropical desert, into the frozen arctic, and back to the desert, not only without dying, but also not aging a bit. unless there was a jeep, or a jumbo jet hangin around thousand's of years ago, this movie is completely bogus.

[–] Noldon 18 years ago

I could not agree more, it sounds like an excuse for needless nudity. I haven't seen this movie and I have no intention of doing so.

[–] Bladerunner 12 years ago

I can't resist responding to this, despite the fact that it's six years old. What is wrong with people who haven't even seen a movie, but they condemn it and then arrogantly proclaim they have "no intention" of seeing it. Who. Cares? Who cares if you'll see it or not? Why would you bother posting in a thread about a movie you have "no intention" of seeing, except someone who wants to show off how haughty they are? Sad.

"...nothing is left of me, each time I see her..." - Catullus

[–] eden_echo 18 years ago

Have you even looked at this film? It's FAR from being a pornographic film, if it was we would see graphic, graphic sex in it and there ISN'T ANY! Yes, people kiss, but how is that even considered pornographic, it was very tasteful nudity and it was done in the most tasteful way possible. The actors were not doing anything even remotely graphic with their bodies, it was a sensual film and it took a lot of hard work to make and it was well worth it!

"I promise you, before I die I'll surely come to your doorstep"

[–] NewDivide1701 15 years ago

Show me where the man penetrates the woman sexually, either actual or simulated. Don't know where it is? Then how can you make this argument? Pornography, either hard or soft, focuses on the genitals in action. Where are they in action?

There are far more sexually graphic scenes on prime time TV then what can be found on this movie. And all you see are the dancers in their birthday suits. But if nudity means porn, then is this porn?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dmbfan74/2284783797/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dmbfan74/2285572256/in/set-72157603968511 126/
http://www.ifimages.com/public/image/12497/view.html

Hey, they have your requirements for porn.

"Come, come, Mr. Scott. Young minds, fresh ideas. Be tolerant." - James T. Kirk

[–] rb1401 15 years ago

Didn't the Book of Genesis say that Adam and Eve were naked? I don't see what your problem is about nudity - it's certainly not pornographic. Your comments do say a lot about you, I have to say, and the other person who supported you.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]