Curious...
I've just watched this film for the first time, and I enjoyed it very much, but I was struck by an odd structural approach to it, and I wonder if anyone else had the same reaction.
It seemed to me that the film wasn't really "about" what it pretends to be about: to wit, the coming out and/or coming-of-age of a French youth. Considering that the relevant details are supplied very early on, and notwithstanding Julien Baumgartner's astonishingly expressive (and attractive, but I digress) face, the story isn't really about him. Rather, the bulk of the film concerns itself with the community and interpersonal reactions to his coming out and/or coming-of-age. Which is an odd way of going about it, but an approach that I enjoyed immensely. It sort of reminded me of Stephen Sondheim's Company, in that each scene is a variation on the theme with new participants, rather than an attempt at advancing a plot.
Anyway, I quite liked it, and I'm not at all bashing the film when I say this. Quite the contrary.
Oh, one other curious feature: I thought the subtitles were excellent. Some of the best I've ever read on a non-Criterion release. But they were curiously British in slang and spelling...
Who's with me? I want to program a French coming-of-age marathon featuring The 400 Blows, You'll Get Over It and La Souffle au Coeur [Murmur of the Heart]...